win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling  (Read 34839 times)

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« on: March 04, 2013, 07:49:05 AM »
I recently wrote a letter to USBC concerning my opinions on the current state of bowling that I thought I'd share with everyone.  I actually got a response, and just about word for word what I expected, but at least an actual human read my letter and replied.  Here is the letter, their response, and then I'll finish up:

This is an open letter to whom it may concern reflecting my opinions and comments regarding the state of bowling as a whole as well as a widely perceived view on how the USBC is only serving to further destroy the sport so many of us love and have already begun to mourn.  I will however begin by saying that the USBC Open Championships represents everything that is right with the sport of bowling.  The challenge, the venues, the organization, the execution, the resources, etc., every part of "Nationals" is so expertly crafted that even some of the best bowlers in the world make a point to come compete.  That, unfortunately, is where it ends, and could one day be lost as bowling as a whole continues to decline.  It is incredibly irresponsible of USBC to be so out of touch with league bowling, the very foundation of the sport.  I read a published article regarding fresh oil for every squad at the 2013 Open Championships, finally correcting the only problem I believe the event had.  It referenced a quote from someone regarding having one pattern for the team event and a different pattern for singles and doubles, effectively saying that USBC wanted to challenge their bowlers' versatility.  I found it to be one of the most hypocritical statements or comments I have ever come across.  USBC's specifications and limits regarding legal lane conditions are so wide open that thousands of league bowlers who never practice can show up to league once a week, shoot 750 with the only ball they own, and go home without so much as a thought.  These are the same people that post 230+ averages during the league season, only to show up to the Open Championships to shoot 1500 for all events, and go home with their tails between their legs.  The idea that making tighter restrictions on lane conditions would only serve to further drive away bowlers and hurt revenue for center owners is ludicrous, as USBC membership has fallen from approximately 9 million to 1.7 million in a little over a decade, corresponding with ever increasing numbers of "honor scores" and member averages.  When scoring was harder, people spent money practicing, centers were full for early AND late leagues every night of the week.  This has made the future for our youth bowlers dismal, and has driven away the majority of the truly skilled bowlers.  The quality of coaches has declined, combined with the fact that it's impossible to convince a kid they made a bad shot even though they struck.  If youth bowlers are putting up numbers on easy shots, they believe they are good, and become hard to coach.  Then when they start competing in Junior Gold or PBA Experience leagues, they become discouraged fast, and when they are ready to be coached, more often than not, their game has to be completely torn down and rebuilt.  There was a youth in my city recently who shot his "first" 800.  He is not skilled, and not accurate.  He is a no thumb bowler who simply throws a lot of revs and a lot of speed, and on a legal USBC pattern, all he really has to do is keep the ball right of the headpin to strike.  This past summer, he, like a lot of the city high school bowlers, joined our summer PBA Experience league.  He proceeded to shoot 354 for the entire 3 game set the first night of league on the Cheetah pattern, following which he packed up his equipment and never came back.  This is the kind of bowler the USBC is creating.  I used to believe my "accomplishments" were earned and worth something, now I realize they aren't worth any more than the metal the rings are made out of, which is in fact so cheap that they are impossible to resize.  All my work, my effort, what I've learned, it's all meaningless.  I have been a pro shop operator for 7 years now, and I would consider my knowledge, experience, and skill to be very high, yet the process of selecting a ball, watching the bowler, and crafting a layout and surface prep for most USBC sanctioned lane conditions is needless.  I can pick any ball off the wall, "label" drill it, never touch the surface, put holes in it, and whoever I drill it for will be "successful."  People in their 60's and 70's are reaching scores they have never seen before.  It's more surprising to hear that someone has NOT achieved "perfection" now than to hear that they have.  USBC is supposed to be the governing body for sanctioned competition, but all it serves to do is drive people elsewhere for real competition or real challenge.  Bowling is no longer a sport, or even a game, it is a recreation, where people gather in attempts to record obscene numbers or merely occupy them while they drink and socialize.  Any activity that requires zero practice and little effort to achieve "perfection" will eventually cease to exist.  I have put my life into bowling, and in turn it nearly became my life, but no longer.  I am ashamed to be a USBC member, and to be associated with the laughingstock that this recreation of sanctioned bowling has become.  The amount of money and time that has to be put into obtaining "available" coaching certifications, or to attend "available" tournaments or events is staggering, and the opportunity to prepare for these things doesn't exist for most of us.  The USBC is turning a blind, uncaring, ignorant eye to the most important things in bowling, while raising sanction fees at the same time.  Charging me admission to view the destruction of a sport I have put my life into is unacceptable.  For the first time in several years, I will not attend the Open Championships, simply because I have zero opportunities to practice on tougher conditions to prepare in the months leading up to the tournament.  The attitude the USBC has towards the sport is wholly irresponsible.  I can serve my kids cake for supper, but make vegetables available, which do you think they will choose?  Bowling is not on the rise, it continues to fall, and the focus and effort is completely in the wrong direction.  Making coaching and affordable equipment available and teaching a golfer how to putt makes little difference if the greens they play on funnel down towards the hole.  The USBC is singularly to blame for the current state of bowling, and it disgusts me.  Thank you for your time.

The response:
I appreciate your feedback and your membership. Your email illustrates a challenging issue the industry faces. USBC’s role in controlling lane conditions are a controversial subject and one that draws out many strong opinions. While you make a good argument for a mandating lower scoring lane conditions, there are enforcement and compliance challenges on the other side. USBC’s Sport Bowling program attempts to provide an option for those bowlers/centers who want the challenge you seek. I realize this is not a perfect solution as many communities do not have a center that offers Sport Bowling leagues.

 

I respect your passion for the sport and have no doubt your opinions come from a desire to improve bowling. I do want to clarify your implication that USBC has been raising dues. USBC national dues are $10 and have not increased since 2006.

 

Thank you for taking the time to write.

 

Best regards,

Jason Overstreet

USBC Communications


First of all regarding the league dues, a few years ago our dues rose from $15 to $17, apparently our local association raised their fee and blamed it on USBC, so I wasn't very happy about that, I definitely would not have stuck that in my letter if I'd have known.  The point of the letter wasn't to throw USBC under the bus, but this is honestly the way I believe it is.  I knew I would get something back about the challenges of enforcement, but here's the deal.  The USBC let it get out of control years ago when they were more concerned about an ounce of sideweight in a ball than about the ball itself, or about regulating the oil patterns.  The PBA figured this out 15 or more years ago, why didn't the USBC?  So maybe the current people in power at the USBC didn't have anything to do with it, but the organization itself is completely responsible.  Regarding the challenges though, as I said in the letter, I've worked in the bowling industry for 7 years now, I very well understand all the challenges and issues, I'm not just writing the letter crying about things without having a very knowledgeable and objective viewpoint.  Honestly though, they're going to have to do something, and here's the real point of contention.  Center owners will fight tougher conditions because they think they'll lose business.  Well, they have already lost business for years.  A real simple solution here, make conditions tougher for the sanctioned leagues.  If you don't want a tougher shot, don't bowl a sanctioned league.  What does sanctioning really do for you?  Gives you some trinkets, and allows you to use your average in tournaments for potential handicap.  People wouldn't quit bowling if they were told their league wouldn't be sanctioned, they would see it as a way to save fees every year.  Most people don't bowl tournaments anymore.  But of course, this would really hurt the USBC.  So instead of really governing the sport and enforcing the rules, they're content to just let things slip away while they say, "oh, well we offer a bunch of stuff."  Rant off. 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

 

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #136 on: April 18, 2013, 07:17:12 AM »
The point I was trying to make was that people like to watch greatness, and especially things in sports that we couldn't imagine ourselves doing.  People still watch golf because 99.9% of amateurs can't shoot 65s or drive a ball 350 yards, it's impressive to watch.  Pro bowlers don't look any different than anybody else, they shoot 220s or 230s mostly, you might as well be watching a competition between a couple guys in your local scratch league.  People watch Tiger because they could see something rare, or that they've never seen before.  People don't watch bowling because you're not going to see anything different.  I watched 10 different 300s this year and saw a guy shoot 877, what am I going to see on a PBA show that's like that?  I can appreciate it because I get the gravity of what's going on, but how many people tuning in for the first time after joining a league to see something exciting are going to be let down or disappointed?  "Oh . . 240-230, I saw 20 people at league last night shoot games like that, I thought these guys were supposed to be good."  Click, last time they'll ever watch that. 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

txbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #137 on: April 18, 2013, 09:52:18 AM »
Giz,

Great points.

Cannot disagree. 

For discussion sake:  If you are thinking (saying) that lowering the general scoring standard (maybe over time) so that the general public and the general bowling public once again recognizes the talent and skill of the top bowlers in our sport?

Who benefits from such a plan? 

The top bowlers in our sport.  Who would get recognized again for their skill and accomplishment.  Correct?   

But you are asking for changes that affect over 1 million bowlers that would benefit only a few thousand a most.  And probably a few hundred.

And if implemented, will cost proprietors to lose business in the immediate future. 

And if the top bowlers do get recognized, what rewards will they get?  More money, maybe, but history has shown that bowling is never going to be the money making sport like golf, tennis etc.  But yet, again, you want business to potentially (because we don't know for sure what would actually happen, we can only predict) lose league income because some % of bowlers quit because their ego can't stand having their 200+ averages lowered to a more reasonable level.  So that potentially a small % of the bowling population can be recognized for their talents and have their egos stroked because I doubt they'll get paid.

Just my 2 cents. 

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #138 on: April 18, 2013, 10:33:19 AM »
Giz,

Great points.

Cannot disagree. 

For discussion sake:  If you are thinking (saying) that lowering the general scoring standard (maybe over time) so that the general public and the general bowling public once again recognizes the talent and skill of the top bowlers in our sport?

Who benefits from such a plan? 

The top bowlers in our sport.  Who would get recognized again for their skill and accomplishment.  Correct?   

But you are asking for changes that affect over 1 million bowlers that would benefit only a few thousand a most.  And probably a few hundred.

And if implemented, will cost proprietors to lose business in the immediate future. 

And if the top bowlers do get recognized, what rewards will they get?  More money, maybe, but history has shown that bowling is never going to be the money making sport like golf, tennis etc.  But yet, again, you want business to potentially (because we don't know for sure what would actually happen, we can only predict) lose league income because some % of bowlers quit because their ego can't stand having their 200+ averages lowered to a more reasonable level.  So that potentially a small % of the bowling population can be recognized for their talents and have their egos stroked because I doubt they'll get paid.

Just my 2 cents.

Good points . . but I'm on a different angle.  I'm not really looking for the pro bowlers to benefit.  The house owners have been losing league income in bunches for a long time, and with open/casual bowling becoming more popular, league bowling isn't what's sustaining centers anymore.  The problem right now is that the foundation of the sport isn't based on the hardcore bowler (of whatever average, I know plenty of people that bowl 4 times a week that barely carry a 160), or the bowler who has a passion for the sport and who will support it.  It's filled with fairweather people who will cut out and run at the slightest sign of trouble.  The people that would be lost if patterns were made tougher aren't the people who are contributing or who are going to support the sport in the first place.  If they really love the sport, they'll stay.  And the ones who are just doing it for fun won't really care anyway.  Making stuff harder both helps AND hurts the higher percentage the most.  But with bowling so far down anyway, will membership dropping from 1.7 million to 1.5 million really be a drop in the pond? 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #139 on: April 22, 2013, 01:25:56 PM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

bowlerdawg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #140 on: April 22, 2013, 07:55:12 PM »
well said gizmo, I'm, right there with you. I like bowling sport leagues to watch these adult bumper bowlers ego visibly deflate, just like your cheetah kid, but its even more fun watching grows ass people.

i've said it 1,000 times if i have said it once
momma always said the bowler makes the ball, not the other way around.

I was schooled in proper technique and execution, not spray and pray
I was not given ultra high end equipment to learn with ( plastic in fact )
I learned in the way of the old masters, pba pro lived in my neighborhood, gave me my 1st Columbia yellow dot ( burgundy )

I saw the advent of the reactive balls, of which, I still have urethane I still use, mainly to get back to the basics I learned on when my whole swing is off.

I take pride in being in the pocket, while my opponents have 15 boards of play, and most times hit some portion of the head pin and carry all kinds of slop, and they think there really doing something.

I'm old school anyway, but #'s don't lie from 9 mil to less than 2 mil in years is SPOOKY
if I am analyzing the #'s.

I really hate the next generation will miss out on what I had to experience, and you actually have to work to get good.

I have been saying the same thing you said in your letter for a while now, not that I want the outcome, but it is a crying damn shame where the sport is today.

I used to live to watch bowling on the weekends when I was a kid, and could not wait to get to the lanes to work on the tip they used to do on the show, now I have no clue as to what the PBA is doing, when they are on etc....

I still love to bowl, but I feel many millions like me have hung up their shoes for good this time.

Well said

BoBoBrazil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #141 on: April 28, 2013, 08:17:38 AM »
I'm late to the party on this one.  Interesting reading though.

Joe Cool

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1811
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #142 on: April 28, 2013, 09:14:26 AM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

I still get asked that all the time and I cannot explain it in a way that people that don't understand bowling at a high enough level can understand. 
Hit the pocket and hope for the best

swingset

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Captain of the Short Bus
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #143 on: April 28, 2013, 09:08:50 PM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

I still get asked that all the time and I cannot explain it in a way that people that don't understand bowling at a high enough level can understand.

It's quite easy to understand and articulate. I was told early on, and I still explain, that pros are bowling on difficult oil patterns that regular league and tournament bowlers don't often bowl on, and they do so in pressure-cooker situations at a different house every time.

How hard is that to understand? I understood it when I was a total noob.
The only sports worth playing serve alcohol during gameplay.

Joe Cool

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1811
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #144 on: April 28, 2013, 09:18:01 PM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

I still get asked that all the time and I cannot explain it in a way that people that don't understand bowling at a high enough level can understand.

It's quite easy to understand and articulate. I was told early on, and I still explain, that pros are bowling on difficult oil patterns that regular league and tournament bowlers don't often bowl on, and they do so in pressure-cooker situations at a different house every time.

How hard is that to understand? I understood it when I was a total noob.

Congrats.  I'd understand it too.  Some people that ask me don't know they put oil on the lanes...but to be fair, most of them aren't really bowlers.  If they don't know that they put oil on the lanes, it really makes the rest of the conversation pointless.
Hit the pocket and hope for the best

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #145 on: April 30, 2013, 09:16:18 AM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

I still get asked that all the time and I cannot explain it in a way that people that don't understand bowling at a high enough level can understand.

It's quite easy to understand and articulate. I was told early on, and I still explain, that pros are bowling on difficult oil patterns that regular league and tournament bowlers don't often bowl on, and they do so in pressure-cooker situations at a different house every time.

How hard is that to understand? I understood it when I was a total noob.

Congrats.  I'd understand it too.  Some people that ask me don't know they put oil on the lanes...but to be fair, most of them aren't really bowlers.  If they don't know that they put oil on the lanes, it really makes the rest of the conversation pointless.

To be fair, a lot of people don't get the concept.  If you got it early on (swingset) then great.  But a lot of people honestly don't get it, and yes it's mind boggling how people can't get the concept, but because oil is invisible, they just know that the ball goes down and it hooks at some point.  It takes a pretty large information dump over a period of an hour to get somebody in the ballpark of what's going on. 

But THAT is something else I'm talking about.  There's zero parity in the sport, even guys with big averages on house shots think they could take on the pros.  I don't know how you get to 225 on a house shot and not know you couldn't hold Pete Weber's shoes.  Had a kid here a few years ago that got all geared up to go on tour.  Got a bunch of free equipment, took some lessons just to finish near the bottom of a couple regionals, and now he barely bowls, just shows up to take his turn, completely blitzed. 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

txbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #146 on: April 30, 2013, 09:55:35 AM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

I still get asked that all the time and I cannot explain it in a way that people that don't understand bowling at a high enough level can understand.

It's quite easy to understand and articulate. I was told early on, and I still explain, that pros are bowling on difficult oil patterns that regular league and tournament bowlers don't often bowl on, and they do so in pressure-cooker situations at a different house every time.

How hard is that to understand? I understood it when I was a total noob.

Congrats.  I'd understand it too.  Some people that ask me don't know they put oil on the lanes...but to be fair, most of them aren't really bowlers.  If they don't know that they put oil on the lanes, it really makes the rest of the conversation pointless.

To be fair, a lot of people don't get the concept.  If you got it early on (swingset) then great.  But a lot of people honestly don't get it, and yes it's mind boggling how people can't get the concept, but because oil is invisible, they just know that the ball goes down and it hooks at some point.  It takes a pretty large information dump over a period of an hour to get somebody in the ballpark of what's going on. 

But THAT is something else I'm talking about.  There's zero parity in the sport, even guys with big averages on house shots think they could take on the pros.  I don't know how you get to 225 on a house shot and not know you couldn't hold Pete Weber's shoes.  Had a kid here a few years ago that got all geared up to go on tour.  Got a bunch of free equipment, took some lessons just to finish near the bottom of a couple regionals, and now he barely bowls, just shows up to take his turn, completely blitzed. 

This exact same problem existed back in the 70s and 80s when shots were tougher and reactive balls didn't exist.  How do I know, because it happened to me.  In the late 80s, I was bowling 5 nights a week and averaging 227.  I entered several scratched tournaments that had the likes of a young Norm Duke and other area PBA bowlers entered and got my ass handed to me.  I didn't tuck my tail and quit.  I tried to make myself better.  Didn't succeed to their level, but I tried.

Part of this, I think, is that parents today raise their kids in the "everyone wins, no ones calls my child a loser" world we have created.  Everyone gets a trophy, we don't keep score in these games.

So when they get their butts handed to them at their first regional, they don't know how to deal with losing.


Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #147 on: April 30, 2013, 10:22:31 AM »
I have been a scratch bowler for 45 years.  Scratch bowlers in leagues have always averaged as good as the PBA guys on TV, yet at one time viewership was pretty good.  We had over close to 5% of our association averaging 200+ in 1975 when 205 was a decent tour average.  If I had a dollar for every time a 180 average league bowler asked me why I wasnt on tour, I would have more money than I could have made as a PBA member. 

I still get asked that all the time and I cannot explain it in a way that people that don't understand bowling at a high enough level can understand.

It's quite easy to understand and articulate. I was told early on, and I still explain, that pros are bowling on difficult oil patterns that regular league and tournament bowlers don't often bowl on, and they do so in pressure-cooker situations at a different house every time.

How hard is that to understand? I understood it when I was a total noob.

Congrats.  I'd understand it too.  Some people that ask me don't know they put oil on the lanes...but to be fair, most of them aren't really bowlers.  If they don't know that they put oil on the lanes, it really makes the rest of the conversation pointless.

To be fair, a lot of people don't get the concept.  If you got it early on (swingset) then great.  But a lot of people honestly don't get it, and yes it's mind boggling how people can't get the concept, but because oil is invisible, they just know that the ball goes down and it hooks at some point.  It takes a pretty large information dump over a period of an hour to get somebody in the ballpark of what's going on. 

But THAT is something else I'm talking about.  There's zero parity in the sport, even guys with big averages on house shots think they could take on the pros.  I don't know how you get to 225 on a house shot and not know you couldn't hold Pete Weber's shoes.  Had a kid here a few years ago that got all geared up to go on tour.  Got a bunch of free equipment, took some lessons just to finish near the bottom of a couple regionals, and now he barely bowls, just shows up to take his turn, completely blitzed. 

This exact same problem existed back in the 70s and 80s when shots were tougher and reactive balls didn't exist.  How do I know, because it happened to me.  In the late 80s, I was bowling 5 nights a week and averaging 227.  I entered several scratched tournaments that had the likes of a young Norm Duke and other area PBA bowlers entered and got my ass handed to me.  I didn't tuck my tail and quit.  I tried to make myself better.  Didn't succeed to their level, but I tried.

Part of this, I think, is that parents today raise their kids in the "everyone wins, no ones calls my child a loser" world we have created.  Everyone gets a trophy, we don't keep score in these games.

So when they get their butts handed to them at their first regional, they don't know how to deal with losing.

Yep . . . times have definitely changed.  You remember Bob Benoit?  He has a lot of stories about the 80s in Texas . . .
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

charter member

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 13
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #148 on: April 30, 2013, 12:43:26 PM »
Interesting posts in this thread.  I'm not sure there is an answer.  I'm enjoying the discussion.  Nice to see productive discussion instead of the insults that happen at a lot of internet sites.  Keep it up.
www.bowlersdeals.com promo code (5% discount): hartpromo

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Letter to USBC Re: the state of bowling
« Reply #149 on: April 30, 2013, 12:53:32 PM »
Interesting posts in this thread.  I'm not sure there is an answer.  I'm enjoying the discussion.  Nice to see productive discussion instead of the insults that happen at a lot of internet sites.  Keep it up.

Yeah, a lot of people are making pretty good points.  I don't agree with all of them, but they don't agree with all my points.  Nice to at least have a discussion with people who can share and support their opinions without attacking someone else personally . .
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?