win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?  (Read 14167 times)

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2002
Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« on: August 14, 2013, 03:38:54 PM »
OK, here's a question for Avabob (and the other old timers)  since he's been winning since a little before I was born.  Which era was the best bowling wise?  Rubber, Polyester, Urethan or Reactive?  Not your best results, because I've read your opinion on short oil, or the most participation, because that declines every year, but the just the most overall enjoyable time to bowl.

I know this will be very dependent on your life circumstances at various times, but try to think just about the bowling at the time.

 

batbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2013, 10:09:06 AM »
Yes with the Excalibur being the first reactive ball that would make bradl being born about 1973-74 time frame!
Bruce Campbell
Coaches aren't born, they are made!
USBC Silver Certified Coach
          
www.rotogrip.com
www.stormbowling.com
www.radicalbowling.com
www.damngoodbowling.com

Changing bowling, one bowler at a time!

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2013, 01:14:19 PM »
The first reactive resin bowling ball was the Columbia bleeder circa '75....the second was the original Faball blue hammer
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

fluff33

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2013, 08:40:08 PM »
The first reactive resin bowling ball was the Columbia bleeder circa '75....the second was the original Faball blue hammer
I believe the Columbia yellow dot bleeder was a soft plastic ball and the blue Hammer was a pure urethane.  The best yellow dots were the early ones with a serial number that started with 5T.

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2013, 08:45:20 PM »
If you understood my post you would understand that the 1975 Columbia 'bleeder' had an additive that made it 'react' differently than simply a polyester ball...the original Faball blue hammers, also had an additive in the cover and it too react differently than a urethane bowling ball...the bleeder was an accident, the blue hammer was not...both had an additive to change their reactions...not far off from the original NuLine Excalibur...
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

BrianCRX90

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #20 on: August 18, 2013, 08:58:33 PM »
I'm just a genx'r but anything after 2005 has been disastrous. If your wondering why that particular year, do an internet search on what happened to sanctioned bowling that year.

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8152
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2013, 11:34:49 PM »
I'm just a genx'r but anything after 2005 has been disastrous. If your wondering why that particular year, do an internet search on what happened to sanctioned bowling that year.

I am going to take a wild guess that it was something like the death of the ABC?

_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2013, 11:44:06 PM »
As a younger bowler 29 ( not that young) i gotta say i love reading the info you guys are giving from back in the day. I love the sport and wish sometimes i could go back in time and test my skills
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

Long Gone Daddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5471
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #23 on: August 19, 2013, 02:45:29 PM »
I have a feeling that most people are going to pick the era that they were at the top of their game, both physically and mentally.  It would the 90's and 00's for me.  2010 and after have not been kind to me.  Has nothing to do with equpiment or lanes.
Long Gone also posts the honest truth which is why i respect him. He posts these things knowing some may not like it.

Mainzer

bradl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #24 on: August 19, 2013, 06:04:08 PM »
bradl,

So if you were 18 when reactives got going (1992), that puts your birth around 1974.  You started bowling when you were 4 and know about the game from the 70's?

And the best "era" for bowling was 73-93, which covers plastic, all of urethane, and the beginning of reactive?

Am I the only one confused?

Yes with the Excalibur being the first reactive ball that would make bradl being born about 1973-74 time frame!

Yep.. that's right. Born in 1974. My uncle got my mother into bowing in the late 1960s. By the time shortly after I was born she was bowling 2 nights a week, so I was literally running around a bowling alley by the time I was 3 to 4. After league was over, she'd pay .75 or $1 or whatever it was, help me with an 8lb ball, and either run and drop it or granny it on the lane. Comfort me when I cried because every ball fell in the gutter, or watch me jump up and down when I took a corner pin off the rack.

But every Saturday when my dad wanted to watch football, I begged him to stop on the PBA Tour when he flipped through the channels.. and back then, you had to turn the channel knob, so you had to go through it, especially if you only had 3 stations on the main knob in Omaha (the UHF knob is where PBS and all snow was). So I got to see a lot of Anthony, Roth, Berardi, Dickinson, Durbin, Weber, Salvino, Bluth, Myers, Schlegel, Troup, and all of golden era guys when they were on the tour, and before there was a Senior or Women's tour.

IIRC, YABA rules back then even said that you had to be 5 to start bowling, so my first league wasn't until 1979. Since that league, I traded Smurfs, Spiderman & His Amazing Friends, Dungeons and Dragons, Mighty Orbots, Blackstar, and CBS StoryTime on Saturday mornings for an 8lb. Powder Blue White Dot and clown shoes. And still made it home in time to catch the Tour. :)

So I got to see a lot of bowling. I almost gave up the sport after the season ended in 1987 because the coaches bailed on the league and it was as if the alley didn't care. But we moved that year, went to a different house, and saw kids my age using fingertip drills and grips, while I was still in a conventional grip. That's when I knew I wasn't taking the game as seriously as I thought I was, so I gave it one more try, and haven't looked back. The rest... is history.

Anywho, if it weren't for my mother letting me bowl after her league ended, I wouldn't have had any interest in the sport, especially from back then. Seeing old matches from then reminds me of my youth.. literally speaking! :)

BL.

Armourboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #25 on: August 19, 2013, 09:12:57 PM »
Always makes me jealous when I hear about those that had youth programs around or whose parents got them into bowling. We had diddly around here til about 10 years ago when they added high school programs. Of course by then I was long since out of high school.

batbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #26 on: August 19, 2013, 10:14:40 PM »
As per Justrico stated about the bleeder yellow dot! Columbia 300 did a lot a experimenting with coverstock a lot because of the Sur D! When it was outlawed for the hardness rule they had the bleeder and the red dot had an additive that gave the cover a different texture as did the orange dot! Brunswick tried to do something different with the cover of the Mark X that made the cover ripple on most of them and didn't work out to well. It probably all started when guys back in the day would soak their bowling balls in solvents to make the cover softer, before the hardness rules in the early 70's! Just my $.02, Bruce
Bruce Campbell
Coaches aren't born, they are made!
USBC Silver Certified Coach
          
www.rotogrip.com
www.stormbowling.com
www.radicalbowling.com
www.damngoodbowling.com

Changing bowling, one bowler at a time!

Urethane Game

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #27 on: August 20, 2013, 01:56:08 PM »
I don't remember the exact date but the best era for me was when I only had to carry two balls to league.  :)

Anything more than a Yellow Dot and a Black Angle would be overkill.

bradl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #28 on: August 20, 2013, 02:25:54 PM »
Always makes me jealous when I hear about those that had youth programs around or whose parents got them into bowling. We had diddly around here til about 10 years ago when they added high school programs. Of course by then I was long since out of high school.

I don't know if it has to do more with location than exposure, but I know how you mean.

Back to my mother. where she grew up at in southeastern Oklahoma, there was only 1 bowling alley, and it was a 35 mile drive to it. But to my knowledge, they had a youth program there, at least when I went to it every time we visited my grandparents. I want to say it was the only bowling alley in a 50 mile radius of that town (Paris, TX). Again, this is small town/rural country, so that made a difference. It could be that most other places wouldn't care, because the sport didn't get any sort of traction there. If Paris didn't already have that traction, every boy would have been lost to football in either Oklahoma or Texas.

Jealousy.. I know how you feel, because when I was in high school, I was invited to join the elite youth bowling league in our city: Junior Traveling Classic. Minimum requirement was a 150 average sustained over 2 years. That was our leap pad to being scouted by collegiate teams (Nebraska, Kansas, Kansas State, Wichita State, Mankato State, and at least 5 others all in 3 hours drive). A lot of us made it to collegiates...

But we missed out on everything that Junior Olympic Gold now offers.. and to make it worse/better, performance in the JTC is now a ticket to the JoG tournaments, as well as collegiate scouting. If we had that back then, who knows what the potential for our crop would have been.

BL.

cuzy51

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #29 on: August 20, 2013, 04:16:35 PM »
They were all great times,each served it's purpose and I am very glad I have had the chance to bowl competitively in each era. The early rubber and polyester days demanded accuracy which has allowed me to adapt to the changes that has followed. I have consistently been able to improve my average with each change while still retaining that accuracy. Our concern now is how to drive people back into the bowling houses and fill them up with league players. I really believe this wing it and bring it has been the demise of our sport. I watch these young players now that have grown up in the reactive era, and most of them have no clue how to make a spare.

Armourboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
Re: Old timers, which was the best era of bowling?
« Reply #30 on: August 20, 2013, 04:16:49 PM »
Its kind of odd here, pretty much every town has its own bowling center,  but it hasn't ever seemed like anyone ever did anything to try and generate new bowlers.

I always had to go to the one Murfreesboro when I got older because my local one in Shelbyville was more like a honky tonk than a bowling alley. Too many rednecks and too many fights. Not to mention the owner didn't take care of his customers or the center either.

Luckily there was about 5 places I could go within 30 to 45 minutes of my house so I just chose somewhere else.