BallReviews
General Category => Miscellaneous => Topic started by: n00dlejester on April 13, 2008, 11:37:24 PM
-
So yesterday I bowled in the NJ State Tournament, and lo and behold Parker Bohn III was there for the 9:00AM singles/doubles squad, and the 12:30PM 5-man team squad. So we start the day bowling doubles, and the first game he fired a 300. He was part of about 10 brackets and obviously destroyed anybody. Because of this people near my pairs (I was on 3-4) were saying that having a pro is a non-PBA event is just not fair. One guy made the analogy that "it's like having Ryan Howard playing for the high school varsity team."
I personally think having pros in local events is fine. The talent gap between the pros and the locals (at least on a THS, which this tournament was) is nowhere near the talent gap between local and pro baseball players. And it was a lot of fun watching him tear it up on a THS (he shot 780 for doubles, and a low 7 for singles). What are your thoughts on all this?
-
My thoughts are if most bowlers put as much effort into their games as they do into whining, they'd be much better bowlers.
--------------------
Andrew
-
Why not let them play, they pay their leagues fees and local association dues.
--------------------
Dale Williams
Columbia 300 Utah Amateur Staff
-
The thing is, the tournaments you are complaining about are organizational events, not pro or amatuer events. The props pay thier membership dues, and therefore have every right to participate in those events.
--------------------
Visionary Test Staff 07-08
-
let them bowl, it will only make you better.
--------------------
Oil is served Best with fingers!
Why does the 8 Pin laugh at me!
Sheppy
-
Rules for the TOURNAMENT have to define acceptance of Pros .. I would prefer WATCHING events where they are acceptable!
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
quote:
Just remember, if he would of gotten beat by a bunch of people, this would of never even been a topic!!!
BULL CRAP!! lol if I ever beat PB3 I would tell EVERYONE!! lol
I know where your coming from though, we had a PBA guy to bowl in a 9pin no tap tournament a couple months ago which I didn't know he was a PBA player till I happened to go through the exempt players and there he was...but it was doubles and his partner wasn't bowling well and we still beat them so I don't care..lol
--------------------
Throwing hambones since 2005.
www.myspace.com/nestes12
-
Personally i think that exempt pro's should stay away from these types of events. But he does have a right to bowl in it.
-
Parker bowls that tournament almost every year. Its good PR.
-
I've had Mike Wolfe stomp me in brackets in our city tournament before, and I have no problem with it. He's a nice guy, fun to bowl with, and it's not like he's some kind of mystical, unbeatable force. He's just another bowler who happens to be more talented than 99% of us and makes a career out of it.
-
quote:
So yesterday I bowled in the NJ State Tournament, and lo and behold Parker Bohn III was there for the 9:00AM singles/doubles squad, and the 12:30PM 5-man team squad. So we start the day bowling doubles, and the first game he fired a 300. He was part of about 10 brackets and obviously destroyed anybody. Because of this people near my pairs (I was on 3-4) were saying that having a pro is a non-PBA event is just not fair. One guy made the analogy that "it's like having Ryan Howard playing for the high school varsity team."
I personally think having pros in local events is fine. The talent gap between the pros and the locals (at least on a THS, which this tournament was) is nowhere near the talent gap between local and pro baseball players. And it was a lot of fun watching him tear it up on a THS (he shot 780 for doubles, and a low 7 for singles). What are your thoughts on all this?
you wouldn't have complained if he shot 620, 615, 660. you would have said something like "wow, parker bohn sucked, i even beat him, i will tell everyone." i have watched multiple non-pro bowlers put up better numbers than he did in your tourney. a bowler is a bowler. pro bowlers can shoot highscores, but if you watch all the telecasts, you can also see they can shoot 149's with ease. and its not like ryan howard playing in highschool, cause that is not allowed. bad bad analogy.
--------------------
ultra zone
hammer toxic
twisted fury
hot rod hybrid
kick zone
avalanche pearl
clear golf ball
Edited on 4/14/2008 9:23 AM
-
As long as they have reason to be there, I'm fine with it. I've seen Steve Jaros at some of the local tournaments around Chicago, I know Chris and Linda Barnes still bowl the various Kansas tournaments. Now, if WRW came up to Chicago just for our city tournament or if Danny Wiseman went out to California for their state tournament, that I would disagree with. A lot of the PBA guys will bowl league, or manage a bowling center when not on tour, a few own at least one center (Doug Kent). I view city and state tournaments as just a step above league, you bowl with people you like. I'm sure the PBA guys that bowl these tournaments do so because they get be in a competive environment without having their livlihood on the line.
--------------------
It IS next year!
-
quote:
quote:
So yesterday I bowled in the NJ State Tournament, and lo and behold Parker Bohn III was there for the 9:00AM singles/doubles squad, and the 12:30PM 5-man team squad. So we start the day bowling doubles, and the first game he fired a 300. He was part of about 10 brackets and obviously destroyed anybody. Because of this people near my pairs (I was on 3-4) were saying that having a pro is a non-PBA event is just not fair. One guy made the analogy that "it's like having Ryan Howard playing for the high school varsity team."
I personally think having pros in local events is fine. The talent gap between the pros and the locals (at least on a THS, which this tournament was) is nowhere near the talent gap between local and pro baseball players. And it was a lot of fun watching him tear it up on a THS (he shot 780 for doubles, and a low 7 for singles). What are your thoughts on all this?
you wouldn't have complained if he shot 585, 615, 660. i have watched multiple non-pro bowlers put up better numbers. a bowler is a bowler. pro bowlers can shoot highscores, but if you watch all the telecasts, you can also see they can shoot 149's with ease.
I dont think he was complaining. In fact in knowing the original poster's scores I believe he beat Parker's singles scores. Besides, there is a huge difference in watching someone throw a 149 on a PBA telecast and throwing a 149 on a THS at Howell Lanes. Re-read the post.
--------------------
ultra zone
hammer toxic
twisted fury
hot rod hybrid
kick zone
avalanche pearl
clear golf ball
-
We can check the standings here:
http://njbowling.com/njstatetournament.htm
I did beat him in singles, I shot a 757 scratch to his whatever it was.
And as far as whoever said I was complaining: I wasn't. Read my post again.
Sportskraz, say something dude.
It was a lot of fun. I must say having all those yellow Bohn Zone shirts floating around was cool.
-
quote:
Sportskraz, say something dude.
He did say something, but he buried his post inside the quote tags, so it's hard to see it.
-
Sportskraz, sorry dude.
-
I think it's great that guys like Parker stil support their local and state events
--------------------
Tennelle Milligan
Team USA-1999,2007, & 2008
Barry Asher's Custom Embroidery
Vise Grip Staff 2007- present
-
I have mixed emotions about this...
On one hand, it's pretty cool that amateurs can mix it up with the pros. Not many other sports does the average fan have that opportunity. However, it kinda sucks going into a tournaments knowing you're an amateur and someone with "Professional" status is likely to throw up some great numbers. Although, there are plenty of bowlers on a THS format that can do the same, so I dunno. Probably more a mental thing there.
On the other hand, it's kinda sad if the Pro's are hitting amateur tournaments because they aren't making enough off of tour to support themselves and their families. But it's cool if they're doing it because they enjoy mixing it up with different bowlers in different locations.
All in all, I reckon there's more good from having the Pro's bowl in "amateur" tournaments than bad.
--------------------
9~
It's a Sheep thing... You wouldn't understand!
-
If you want to keep the pro player out then the tournament commitee should put it in the rules, if not in rules they have as much right to be there as anyone else.
-
If people are ok with pros bowling in "amateur" tournaments, then maybe there should be less complaining about people who "aren't good enough" bowling in flagship events, like the US Open...
--------------------
Reporting from England
-
A few years back some of the midwest regional bowlers questioned whether the exempt players should be allowed in the regional competitiion.
Guess everyone is supposed to have their "niche".
--------------------
Charter Member FOS
Have Balls - Will Travel
-
The pros got to eat too.
--------------------
Those that can do. Those that can't complain.
My saying for the day: "You can take the ho out of the hood, but you can't take the ho out of the ho."
-
A professional competing against amateurs in any event in which skill is a
major component, does not equal a level playing field. In a tournament, I
bowl to win, not to give my money to a professional. I would not bowl the
tournament, as the likelihood of me beating PBJ3 is not very high. I also
fail to see how anyone else's bowling makes you a better bowler.
-
Lisa Wagner bowls the Georgia State Tournament. Granted, she's not a card-carrying proanymore, but really.....
--------------------
Ken
Videos at http://www.putfile.come/k-dawg77
http://www.myspace.com/lefthandedhammerpride
http://khlthe2nd.bowlspace.com
http://members.bowl.com/FindAMember/memberView.aspx?mp=418&ms=2006&s=2006-2007
-
There is no score in bowling that you can't beat yourself, or at least tie..
-
quote:
I would not bowl the tournament, as the likelihood of me beating PBJ3 is not very high.
If that was the case, I wouldn't bowl in any tournament some of the better non-professional regional bowlers enter, because they can beat me 9 times out of 10...
In a tournament, I bowl to compete. I know the odds of me winning aren't good, but that's not the point for me.
-
quote:
The talent gap between the pros and the locals (at least on a THS, which this tournament was) is nowhere near the talent gap between local and pro baseball players.
You willing to put money on that? I've bowled with Ricky Ward in league a few times when he was still on tour. Now Ricky isn't the best of the best like Parker, but he was a member for a long time. He made 790s look like it was 620s on a THS. Now I'm nothing in this sport but Ricky bowled on this team with some of the best our area had to offer and they couldn't keep up with him. While they were averaging 220-225 he was in the 245-250 range and made it look easy. Don't kid yourself, there is a HUGE talent gap between pros and locals in any sport.
--------------------
Join the Revolution
http://www.ronpaul2008.com
http://www.900global.com
Edited on 4/14/2008 12:37 PM
-
I think it is great that some of the pros get out there and mix it up with regular bowlers. If someone is THAT concerned that they may have to bowl a pro, go enter an ABT event or some other event that prohibits them from bowling. Sure, everyone wants to win, but there are a LOT of people out there who would love to see a pro bowl in person and get a chance to meet them.
-
Any USBC event (State Tournament or City Tournament) should be open to pros bowling. Any scratch area tournament should also be open. I would have a problem with a pro trying to bowl a handicap club event (i.e. ABT) although I don't think any would try that anyway.
--------------------
Thanks,
DW
-
quote:
A professional competing against amateurs in any event in which skill is a major component, does not equal a level playing field. In a tournament, I
bowl to win, not to give my money to a professional. I would not bowl the
tournament, as the likelihood of me beating PBJ3 is not very high. I also
fail to see how anyone else's bowling makes you a better bowler.
Judging by that statement you've never competed on any serious level.
--------------------
Join the Revolution
http://www.ronpaul2008.com
http://www.900global.com
-
My opinion is this. They put their pants on just like you do. one leg at a time. There are hundreds of thousands of bowlers out there that have that would be able to be on the national tour but decide not to be a pro. Whether it be due to family, or job, or more money in amateur events it doesn't matter. They pay their dues and if there are not any restriction barring them they have every right to compete. Plus if you beat them you've got your own FIGJAM lol
-
quote:
and the first game he fired a 300.
Now that's funny. Was the white flag raised about the 8th frame?
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
In our area multi tour winner Steve Wilson has always carried a nice average but never 240 - 250 area.
BUT he gets better on the tough stuff!
REgards,
Luckylefty
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
-
quote:
The pros got to eat too.
they want to eat, they can go to work like the rest of us do
-
I bowl in the Missouri State bowling tournament every year. Pete Weber bowls in this tourney on a regular basis. I dont remember hearing anyone there complaining that he was bowling in the tournament. As a matter of fact last year I beat him scratch in all events. To me it was one of the greatest things to happen to me since I started bowling. If he hadn't bowled in the tournament I would have never had this chance. I know that wont happen to often but for one weekend I can say that I beat Pete Weber. And even if you don't beat bowlers like that, how often do you get a chance to bowl with a pro like that??
-
In a City or State tournament, as long as he pays his dues, theres no reason he shouldn't be allowed to bowl. As for the various amateur tournaments that come up throughout the year, that is up to each individual director whether or not he allows pros.
For Parker Bohn III to show up for his own State Tournament, and dominate the brackets, theres nothing wrong with that lol. Theres no reason he shouldn't be allowed to bowl.
-
I'm guessing that the results are not yet updated for this past week-ends scores?
--------------------
r.k.wolfe
-
Yeah, those standings are as of 4/6, he bowled on Sunday the 13th. Give the director a day or two and they should be posted.
-
quote:
In a City or State tournament, as long as he pays his dues, theres no reason he shouldn't be allowed to bowl. As for the various amateur tournaments that come up throughout the year, that is up to each individual director whether or not he allows pros.
For Parker Bohn III to show up for his own State Tournament, and dominate the brackets, theres nothing wrong with that lol. Theres no reason he shouldn't be allowed to bowl.
He dominated the brackets like it was his dayjob. It was awesome haha
-
quote:
There is no score in bowling that you can't beat yourself, or at least tie..
That is, unless the tourney in handicapped and you're giving up pins! 
--------------------
9~
It's a Sheep thing... You wouldn't understand!
-
quote:
On the other hand, it's kinda sad if the Pro's are hitting amateur tournaments because they aren't making enough off of tour to support themselves and their families. But it's cool if they're doing it because they enjoy mixing it up with different bowlers in different locations.
I don't see them bowling in stuff like a state tourney as being for the money, but rather for the honor of being 'the best in the State.'
-
CRACK PIPE
quote:
BULL CRAP!! lol if I ever beat PB3 I would tell EVERYONE!!
-
quote:
He dominated the brackets like it was his dayjob. It was awesome haha
That IS his day job..

--------------------
Inverted 1 and Dead Flush are my Evil Twins...
-
Bowlers who complain about handicap systems being unfair to high average bowlers are the same bowlers complaining that pros shouldnt be allowed in open tournaments. I say the same to thee as yuou say to low average bowler practice and get better.
-
Recently had the local (Amateur)baseball team play against the Yankees .. the Yanks won hands down; Once saw an amateur hockey team play a pro team the pros walked through them; quite often you see amateur boxers step up and move in the low level pros .. most loose their initial bouts .. some get better and move up ...
Point being PROS are there because they excel in their work .. amateurs do their thing as a pass time and 90% of the time can't compete with the pro's!
When a Pro bowler enters a local amateur tournament he has a great advantage .. even higher then a 220 average bowler entering a scratch tournament against bowlers with 200 or less averages!


--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
i just bowled the Minnesota State tourny this weekend. someone has shot2389 scratch, and someone else was over 2400 scratch....abvioulsy for all events. you don't have to be a professional to put up insane numbers and compete and win. in those 20 plus years Parker Bohn has bowled the N.J. state tourny, how many has he actually won? i am just guessing, but probably not to many. hes just out bowling like everyone else.....let'em bowl and go beat him....just my 2 cents.
-
I said it once and I will say it again....
Why should somebody that decides to join a membership not be allowed to bowl???
What makes the guy who averages 240 in league but doesn't have a card less qualified than than the 206 average bowler that chooses to pay a membership to a club? A true professional gets paid for playing their sport. Not paying dues to be a member..
Think about it.
beans
--------------------
www.beansproshop.com
--------------------
Thomas "Beans" Biniek Jr.
PBA Member and Lane#1 Ball Drilling Expert
Thanks for reading and be sure to check us out at the Lane#1 booth in Albuquerque. Check out current eBay auctions at:
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=bowling_with_leah
Official Pro Shop of "ALL" F.O.S. Members!!!
-
Most local tourney's around me have a PBA clause. They all differ slighlty. It's levels the playing field. Here's a couple;
http://www.oldschooltournaments.com/
quote:
Eligibility - Any man or woman can bowl with the exception of
PBA National Champions and Current Exempt PBA members.
Bowlers that have participated In A PBA Event Or Regional PBA Event during
the past 12 months are mandated into the over division. Average rule
applies to all others.
http://www.bowling300.com/nabioflongisland/events.htm
quote:
Open to anyone averaging 220 or under, who has never been a PBA Member.
Must be 20 years of age to participate in the Tournament.
$10 Annual Membership Fee
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
Local tournaments and State Tournaments are different though.
-
All homilies aside, I don't understand the difference between competing and
trying to win. MAJM--I played college football and coached high school base-
ball in a great league for 16 years. I am sure that level is higher than
anything that you have competed in. Don't include any stupid bowling tourn-
aments you have bowled in--it rarely could compare.
-
quote:
I've had Mike Wolfe stomp me in brackets in our city tournament before, and I have no problem with it. He's a nice guy, fun to bowl with, and it's not like he's some kind of mystical, unbeatable force. He's just another bowler who happens to be more talented than 99% of us and makes a career out of it.
That is the point. Mike Wolfe is a nice guy, and so is PB3, however, they have no place in local City, and/or State tournaments. These events are and should be for the local bowlers.
They are better than 99% of us so they should be bowling with the other 1% in tourneys.
And they really shouldn't be stealing your money in the brackets. And that is what it is on a THS, stealing your money.
-
quote:
quote:
I've had Mike Wolfe stomp me in brackets in our city tournament before, and I have no problem with it. He's a nice guy, fun to bowl with, and it's not like he's some kind of mystical, unbeatable force. He's just another bowler who happens to be more talented than 99% of us and makes a career out of it.
That is the point. Mike Wolfe is a nice guy, and so is PB3, however, they have no place in local City, and/or State tournaments. These events are and should be for the local bowlers.
They are better than 99% of us so they should be bowling with the other 1% in tourneys.
And they really shouldn't be stealing your money in the brackets. And that is what it is on a THS, stealing your money.
To be fair, I shot a higher game than Wolfe the first game to get paired with him, and then I backed it up with a 180 after I had trouble with my thumb swelling badly. Like I said, if he was literally unbeatable it'd be a different story. But he's not that much better than some of the best local guys. I sometimes would have a harder time beating Tony Lambert or Chris Hester than Wolfe, and they aren't PBA pros. They're just very talented bowlers as well.
-
I hope anybody who even remotely thinks a pro would enter a state tourny to make money because they aren't making enough money on tour was drunk when that thought entered their mind. Pro's entering those tourny's do it to bowl with friends, and to have no pressure fun. They are just regular guys, who have lots of friends who love to bowl, and they don't get the league opportunities afforded to us.
-
quote:
I hope anybody who even remotely thinks a pro would enter a state tourny to make money because they aren't making enough money on tour was drunk when that thought entered their mind. Pro's entering those tourny's do it to bowl with friends, and to have no pressure fun. They are just regular guys, who have lots of friends who love to bowl, and they don't get the league opportunities afforded to us.
Why do they get in brackets?
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
Fun. Brackets are just another way to spice up the game. Just like card games many people play. Just like all the beers people drink. Seriously, if anybody thinks that Parker Bohn would care about the $50 he just spent in practice after winning $150K? Many people gamble for the excitement, not the money.
-
I join brackets for the thrill of victory and the despair of defeat. That, and it's a fun way to add more competitiveness to the game.
-
quote:
I join brackets for the thrill of victory and the despair of defeat. That, and it's a fun way to add more competitiveness to the game.
Yep, I sure as hell don't do brackets to win money!
I managed to exactly break even on brackets during the city tournament, and also won about $20 off an actual jackpot for a 280 game. I didn't even win enough money to pay for the entry fee for the tournament. But at least it was some extra fun and extra competition.
-
We are talking about the state tournament here (where he lives), not the monthly local $40 buyin scratch tournament. Lets keep it real.
-
quote:
We are talking about the state tournament here (where he lives), not the monthly local $40 buyin scratch tournament. Lets keep it real.
The entry fee was $22 actually
The catch was you had to join both singles and doubles if you wanted to join.
-
quote:
I hope anybody who even remotely thinks a pro would enter a state tourny to make money because they aren't making enough money on tour was drunk when that thought entered their mind. Pro's entering those tourny's do it to bowl with friends, and to have no pressure fun. They are just regular guys, who have lots of friends who love to bowl, and they don't get the league opportunities afforded to us.
I wasn't drunk, but never being on tour myself I don't have first hand knowledge. I've heard it can be tough to make it from a financial standpoint, seeing as how bowling pays a small fraction to our best Pro's in comparison to other professional athletes. I'm not saying that was the reason PB3 was bowling a local tourney, but I thought it could be a reason for some of the other guys who maybe aren't quite as successful, but still full-on PBA professionals.
--------------------
9~
It's a Sheep thing... You wouldn't understand!
-
Couldn't Pros make guest appearances if they wanted to be nice guys .. enter for scoring only for practice .. why lessing (proper word?)their appearance with betting that they are going to beat the competition?
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
The reality is that some pros, exempt or otherwise, also bowl local leagues. Their membership dollars qualify them for association tournaments. If your association does not want them to bowl the tournament, then rewrite the eligibility requirements to exclude them from membership in the first place...
Oh, and am I the only one that finds it ironic that we are watching a thread whining about pros in association tournaments when some of the same posters have expressed a willingness for the association fees to support the PBA?
And another thought...the only person who *might* even be in a position to whine or snivel and have a possible point would be the person who finishes second and, but for the presence of an exempt member, would have been city or state champion.
-
quote:
And another thought...the only person who *might* even be in a position to whine or snivel and have a possible point would be the person who finishes second and, but for the presence of an exempt member, would have been city or state champion.
I still think, as I posted in my first reply, that we should look at it this way: how many golfers get to tee it up with Tiger Woods at a local Country Club? Or how many tennis players get to play a match against Andre Agassi? Bowlers have it good when it comes to accessibility to our Pros, and that's why despite a couple of minor negatives, I think overall it's great for the sport if they are welcomed with open arms to compete with ANY bowler, in any event they choose to enter.
To clarify, when I said it was sad if the Pros were entering local tourneys for money, I made that statement not to be a slam against the pros... It was meant to point out that I think it's sad how our Pros are greatly underpaid and undervalued in comparison to other professional athletes.
--------------------
9~
It's a Sheep thing... You wouldn't understand!
-
quote:
And another thought...the only person who *might* even be in a position to whine or snivel and have a possible point would be the person who finishes second and, but for the presence of an exempt member, would have been city or state champion.
How about all the guys who came in 2nd in the brackets?
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
quote:
That is the point. Mike Wolfe is a nice guy, and so is PB3, however, they have no place in local City, and/or State tournaments. These events are and should be for the local bowlers.
They are better than 99% of us so they should be bowling with the other 1% in tourneys.
And they really shouldn't be stealing your money in the brackets. And that is what it is on a THS, stealing your money.
They are local guys. You mean if a city/state tournament is held in the house Doug Kent owns he shouldn't be allowed to bowl? It's tough to get more local than that. We aren't talking about PBA guys setting up their own little tour hitting as many City/State/County tournaments around that country as they can. These are tournaments that they have likely bowled in since WAY before they went out on tour.
Parker won 10 brackets, what's that $400? How many brackets did he lose when he shot the small 700? 700 won't even crack the top 10 in the Chicago/Illinois tournaments, so that means someone stole Parkers money.
--------------------
It IS next year!
-
quote:
quote:
And another thought...the only person who *might* even be in a position to whine or snivel and have a possible point would be the person who finishes second and, but for the presence of an exempt member, would have been city or state champion.
How about all the guys who came in 2nd in the brackets?
Brackets are ALWAYS about luck of the draw. The bowler that finishes second in the brackets by losing to an exempt pro still made money. IMO, they can have a nice cup of STFU. When you bowl scratch, you agree that you were shoe'ing up to take on ALL comers...
If someone is so strapped for money that it REALLY made a difference, then maybe they shouldn't have been in the brackets in the first place...
-
quote:
If someone is so strapped for money that it REALLY made a difference, then maybe they shouldn't have been in the brackets in the first place...
Does this mean it's OK for a PRO to enter brackets against an amateur? Being STRAPPED for money is a different topic .. now we are discussing should a PRO be entered in a tournament against amateurs .. or .. the Tournament Director can write in the acceptance of Pros competing .. but should the Pros be allowed to enter BRACKETS?
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
quote:
quote:
quote:
And another thought...the only person who *might* even be in a position to whine or snivel and have a possible point would be the person who finishes second and, but for the presence of an exempt member, would have been city or state champion.
How about all the guys who came in 2nd in the brackets?
Brackets are ALWAYS about luck of the draw. The bowler that finishes second in the brackets by losing to an exempt pro still made money. IMO, they can have a nice cup of STFU. When you bowl scratch, you agree that you were shoe'ing up to take on ALL comers...
If someone is so strapped for money that it REALLY made a difference, then maybe they shouldn't have been in the brackets in the first place...
You aren't shoeing up to take on all comers. You are shoe'ing up to take on local non-professionals. The guys that lose to them in brackets are cheated, the guys that finish one spot below them in the tourney are cheated, and it isn't whining it is fact. Parker will probably shoot 800 on a THS over half the time, and 750+ the rest of the time.
Pro's are pro's for a reason, and the local State and City tourney are for the local bowlers, not emempt touring pros that make $150,000 throwing 6 strikes.
You are right though, the local association needs to re-write the rules. How about flat out PBA Champinos are not eligible.
Just another reason bowlign is heading down the crapper.
-
I can't believe all the comments I am hearing about whether or not pros should be allowed to bowl in their state tournament. I would love the opportunity to be able to be able to bowl with someone of Parker Bohn's skill. Our team is headed to our state tournament this weekend and we are doing it as chance to bowl and have fun, if we end up in the money great, if we bowl bad there's always next year. If we are going to take their money in dues then let them bowl with their friends and have fun doing it.
-
quote:
quote:
If someone is so strapped for money that it REALLY made a difference, then maybe they shouldn't have been in the brackets in the first place...
Does this mean it's OK for a PRO to enter brackets against an amateur? Being STRAPPED for money is a different topic .. now we are discussing should a PRO be entered in a tournament against amateurs .. or .. the Tournament Director can write in the acceptance of Pros competing .. but should the Pros be allowed to enter BRACKETS?
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
So... should a 230 avg league bowler be allowed to get matched up against a 190 avg league bowler in tourney brackets? Or should there be different brackets, in 5 pin increments for average group, so everyone is equally paired and has a fair chance to win money?
Personally, I see no difference between getting paired up against the 230 avg. league bowler and PB3 in a bracket.
--------------------
9~
It's a Sheep thing... You wouldn't understand!
-
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
And another thought...the only person who *might* even be in a position to whine or snivel and have a possible point would be the person who finishes second and, but for the presence of an exempt member, would have been city or state champion.
How about all the guys who came in 2nd in the brackets?
Brackets are ALWAYS about luck of the draw. The bowler that finishes second in the brackets by losing to an exempt pro still made money. IMO, they can have a nice cup of STFU. When you bowl scratch, you agree that you were shoe'ing up to take on ALL comers...
If someone is so strapped for money that it REALLY made a difference, then maybe they shouldn't have been in the brackets in the first place...
You aren't shoeing up to take on all comers. You are shoe'ing up to take on local non-professionals. The guys that lose to them in brackets are cheated, the guys that finish one spot below them in the tourney are cheated, and it isn't whining it is fact. Parker will probably shoot 800 on a THS over half the time, and 750+ the rest of the time.
Pro's are pro's for a reason, and the local State and City tourney are for the local bowlers, not emempt touring pros that make $150,000 throwing 6 strikes.
You are right though, the local association needs to re-write the rules. How about flat out PBA Champinos are not eligible.
Just another reason bowlign is heading down the crapper.
If you are afraid to bowl scratch against another scratch bowler, then you need to just stay out of the brackets. Scratch bowling should ALWAYS be about not being afraid to shoe up against whoever else is on the squad or in the tournament. At the scratch level, every bowler has the opportunity to at least split the game in the bracket...
And, let us also not forget that not every exempt pro had the opportunity to throw six strikes for $150K, so we can toss that red herring out the window.
Local bowlers have been shoeing up against national touring players for years. I had the benefit of being in a couple of East Texas leagues nearly 20 years ago where it was not uncommon to see Ozio, Mark Williams and/or Wayne Webb sub in the scratch leagues if they had missed the cut in a particular week. All three were living in the Beaumont/Port Arthur area at the time, so it was home for them. Not once did anyone shy away from the challenge of trying to get their points for the week...if anything, those with solid mental games stepped it up a notch.
Lastly, I don't know about you, but there are many associations that have bowlers who possess the game to have been competitive at both the regional and national levels but, for any number of reasons, have opted not to pursue competition at that level. They are still considered an amateur. Are you also afraid to bowl THEM in the brackets? When you worry about WHO you are bowling against instead of what you are doing on the lanes, then you are already behind in count...mental game has much to do with success on the lanes as you have to keep focused on those elements over which you have control.
-
quote:
quote:
If someone is so strapped for money that it REALLY made a difference, then maybe they shouldn't have been in the brackets in the first place...
Does this mean it's OK for a PRO to enter brackets against an amateur? Being STRAPPED for money is a different topic .. now we are discussing should a PRO be entered in a tournament against amateurs .. or .. the Tournament Director can write in the acceptance of Pros competing .. but should the Pros be allowed to enter BRACKETS?
Absolutely they ought to be able to enter. ANY BOWLER entering an event with brackets ought to be permitted to enter whatever brackets or side pots are available to their Division. Last I checked, scratch was scratch, not 'scratch with exclusions of the people we perceive as uber-talented'
When you enter an event, you know who is bowling. If you are UNWILLING to take that chance of being randomly assigned against an exempt player, then keep your bracket and sidepot money in your pocket.
-
Local bowlers have been shoeing up against national touring players for years. I had the benefit of being in a couple of East Texas leagues nearly 20 years ago where it was not uncommon to see Ozio, Mark Williams and/or Wayne Webb sub in the scratch leagues if they had missed the cut in a particular week. All three were living in the Beaumont/Port Arthur area at the time, so it was home for them. Not once did anyone shy away from the challenge of trying to get their points for the week...if anything, those with solid mental games stepped it up a notch.
They are still considered an amateur. Are you also afraid to bowl THEM in the brackets? quote]
Lets get 2 things straight, I am not afraid to bowl anyone. I have and will continue to bowl in a TQR every year, and regional tourneys as well. This was a question of whether they belong in the tourney in the first place, which I feel they do not. This is a tourney for Amateur bowlers and should stay that way. Scratch or handicap, it should be an amateur tourney. And on top of it for a top pro to take bracket money from folks I feel isn't right. Did he even finish 2nd in any of his brackets? Probably not.
2nd, your argument of local league bowlers going against top pros is no argument, it is a LEAGUE, not a tournament. 2 distinctly differnet things. We had a few pros sub in our PBA experience league here and shoot lights out, and no one cared, including me. It was a League, that is for getting better.
and the Roll to Riches sure does count. Could I have bowled in the roll to riches for $150,000? NO. Why should he be able to come to a local City/State Tourney and take money from the local bowlers, many of which think of this as the highlight to their year?
We will probably have to agree to disagree, but your argument about leagues isn't even close to one about taking tournament cash away from local bowlers, and I think you would feel differnet if you got in $100 worth of brackets and drew PB3 in all of them either in the 1st or 2nd game, shot 250+ and got nothing for your efforts in local tourney. Or would you shrug it off and say luck of the draw?....lol
-
quote:
and the Roll to Riches sure does count. Could I have bowled in the roll to riches for $150,000? NO. Why should he be able to come to a local City/State Tourney and take money from the local bowlers, many of which think of this as the highlight to their year?
And there were what, 58 exempt players who ALSO did not get to roll for $150K.
Taking money from local bowlers? Hell, he IS a local bowler. Granted, he is a local bowler who also happened to be exempt but the simple fact remains that he is a local bowler who paid his association dues. Therefore, anyone in that situation is someone with whom I have absolutely zero objections to seeing enter the event. Who knows, the increased possibility of crossing with a national pro might even serve to add a few entries on an annual basis...
quote:
We will probably have to agree to disagree, but your argument about leagues isn't even close to one about taking tournament cash away from local bowlers, and I think you would feel differnet if you got in $100 worth of brackets and drew PB3 in all of them either in the 1st or 2nd game, shot 250+ and got nothing for your efforts in local tourney. Or would you shrug it off and say luck of the draw?....lol
A c-note is not anything I am going to be bent out of shape with, win OR lose. It is no different than when I go to nationals and happen to draw Tiffany or Anne-Marie or CDB in the brackets. I put up my money, I post my scores against whoever the computer paired me with. It is also no different than if I were to resume bowling my State tourney and have to potentially face Lynda Barnes or CDB. They bowl in this State and are members of the association.
How is it any different to shoot 250+ and lose to a PB III in the first or second round than to lose to any other bowler posting the number who might not be anything more than a league hack? The result remains the same...out of two scores, yours is second best. Period. Suck it up and pony up in the next set. My god, some of you act like a hundred dollar bill is something to be held in awe...
(Oh, and before you ask, their presence is not why I have not bowled the event the past few years...many will recall my rants about the Association's refusal to run a pure classic division. Until they returned to pure scratch, at least in the top division, I voted with my checkbook.)
-
I think there is semi-valid points being brought up on either side of the debate. Personally, I have ALWAYS felt that professionals should not be allowed to enter amateur events, period. In making the decision to "turn pro", they are giving up their right (or at least should be) to compete against amateur bowlers. This has nothing to do with the ability (or lack there of) of the local league bowler to shoot 750+ sets on a regular basis and compete, but rather the entire issue of money. They should allow him to compete for titles/trophies, but not for the amateur's prize fund. Also, I don't feel they should have allowed him to enter all the brackets (which I'm sure he did). And if they did all him to enter, they should have made an announcement that he did enter and offer refunds to any amateur who didn't care to compete against a pro for money. Personally, I would have been quite upset if I had invested some cash into brackets to later find out PBIII was in every bracket (regardless of outcome).
S^2
--------------------
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Absurd Quote Power Rankings (http://"http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=quotes/080403&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab6pos1")
-
He just wanted to make a few quick bucks. Its pretty obvious, by his series' he prob put fourth minimal effort. He made at least 300 off brackets, not counting jackpots, so he has pocket money for the week. Or he can buy his kids something LOL!
Now when that house hack shoots 790 and 820 in team and singles he can tell everyone he beat pbIII. 
--------------------
AIM = y2moe99
-
Actually, the NJ State tourney was 100% handicap of 230. Basically it became a pins over average tournament: who can bowl their very best on their given time and day. Guys like PB3 who are a part of NJ USBC, but didn't have 21 games in league from 06/07 and on got stuck with a 230, so zero pins handicap.
-
quote:
He just wanted to make a few quick bucks. Its pretty obvious, by his series' he prob put fourth minimal effort. He made at least 300 off brackets, not counting jackpots, so he has pocket money for the week. Or he can buy his kids something LOL!
Now when that house hack shoots 790 and 820 in team and singles he can tell everyone he beat pbIII. 
--------------------
AIM = y2moe99
Actually there's only been one 800 scratch series on this THS. It's no sport shot or PBA shot, but it's not easy by any means. The house hacks from other houses (I bowl league at Howell, so I know) didn't know what to do with longer and heavier oil. Sure there were high scores, but a lot of guys wound up saying "I average 220 at <blah blah>, the lanes are messed up"
-
quote:
quote:
He just wanted to make a few quick bucks. Its pretty obvious, by his series' he prob put fourth minimal effort. He made at least 300 off brackets, not counting jackpots, so he has pocket money for the week. Or he can buy his kids something LOL!
Now when that house hack shoots 790 and 820 in team and singles he can tell everyone he beat pbIII. 
--------------------
AIM = y2moe99
Actually there's only been one 800 scratch series on this THS. It's no sport shot or PBA shot, but it's not easy by any means. The house hacks from other houses (I bowl league at Howell, so I know) didn't know what to do with longer and heavier oil. Sure there were high scores, but a lot of guys wound up saying "I average 220 at <blah blah>, the lanes are messed up"
Ask any bowler, any real bowler. It doesn't matter if you win by an pin or a 100; winning's winning. You almost had aa 800? You never had a 800, you never had your balls!
-
If you are participating for money then you are not an amateur.
That is where bowling is messed up compared to about any other game. Only professionals play for money in other activities.
-
quote:
quote:
quote:
He just wanted to make a few quick bucks. Its pretty obvious, by his series' he prob put fourth minimal effort. He made at least 300 off brackets, not counting jackpots, so he has pocket money for the week. Or he can buy his kids something LOL!
Now when that house hack shoots 790 and 820 in team and singles he can tell everyone he beat pbIII. 
--------------------
AIM = y2moe99
Actually there's only been one 800 scratch series on this THS. It's no sport shot or PBA shot, but it's not easy by any means. The house hacks from other houses (I bowl league at Howell, so I know) didn't know what to do with longer and heavier oil. Sure there were high scores, but a lot of guys wound up saying "I average 220 at <blah blah>, the lanes are messed up"
Ask any bowler, any real bowler. It doesn't matter if you win by an pin or a 100; winning's winning. You almost had aa 800? You never had a 800, you never had your balls!
I love you
-
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
He just wanted to make a few quick bucks. Its pretty obvious, by his series' he prob put fourth minimal effort. He made at least 300 off brackets, not counting jackpots, so he has pocket money for the week. Or he can buy his kids something LOL!
Now when that house hack shoots 790 and 820 in team and singles he can tell everyone he beat pbIII. 
--------------------
AIM = y2moe99
Actually there's only been one 800 scratch series on this THS. It's no sport shot or PBA shot, but it's not easy by any means. The house hacks from other houses (I bowl league at Howell, so I know) didn't know what to do with longer and heavier oil. Sure there were high scores, but a lot of guys wound up saying "I average 220 at <blah blah>, the lanes are messed up"
Ask any bowler, any real bowler. It doesn't matter if you win by an pin or a 100; winning's winning. You almost had aa 800? You never had a 800, you never had your balls!
I love you
What can I say but I live my life 40 boards at a time. Nothing else matters: not the oil, not the balls, not my sandbaggers and all their drama. For those 2.3 seconds or less, I'm free.
-
I think this topic has been beat to death, so I will add my whippings to the horse.....
What about the guy averaging 230 in league, hell we have a guy in our scratch league averaging 236, he is not a professional, does not have his card, yet he won the US Senior Open, should we not allow him to bowl too? Where do you draw the line?
Parker Bohn paid his local and state associations dues, he is a vaild member. He deserves the same priveledges that every other member has, which include bowling his local and state tournaments. Discrimination is wrong on any level, including this one.
And for everyone whining.....he got in 10 brackets, cmon, my league runs 20-30 brackets each week, that 10 probably represnts 50% or less of the available brackets. Those whining, are just babies, afraid to stand up be tested. Bohn can shoot 180 as easy as he can shoot 280. This is all a bunch of BS from sore losers who think because they average 210 on THS that they actually a 210 average bowler instead of the 180 house hack they really are. Try bowling on real conditions instead of easy china and see what you average....oh wait then you'll cry and whine about how tough the lanes are..boo hoo. Bunch of babies.
--------------------
Jorge300
-
I'd rather beat Parker Bohn III for a title than Joe League Bowler.
--------------------
J.J. "Waterola Kid" Anderson, the bLowling King : Kill the back row
-
A couple of notes if I may -
- I know noodlejester; he was NOT complaining, just bringing up a topic of conversation.
- it is the "States", where everyone is allowed to bowl; there are no PBA or professional exceptions. (It's the local equivalnet of Nationals: team, sgls, dbls.)
- it is mainly a handicap event; the scratch portion and its awards are smaller than the handicap awards, in general.
- Parker could have gotten in 40 brackets, instead of just 10. But that would not be Parker.
- The event is being held at Howell Lanes; it is Parker's home house. He probably does it more as a favor to Neil, the owner. 
- I watched him sub for Johnny Petraglia 2 weeks ago just after the (very painful) US OPen, which was held just up the road a piece. Parker shot around 660 that night, just trying to relax a bit. I was watching and said hello, mentioning how much less stressed he appeared bowling on the house shot compared to the Ulcer-causing Open shot pattern. He laughed a lot over that.
- Many of the good scratch bowler in the area often have their own side bets as to high series and high all events in the many tournaments like this around the state. Their averages are so high, they rarely stand a chance against the handicap bowlers. Most times, anyway.
- even our own (ballreviews) Krumpy300 shot a 206x in all events, and it was his first time bowling at Howell.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")
-
I hear what you guys are saying.
But get this, I have to bowl against Mike & Mark Scroggins & Mr 900 Jeff Campbell in our city tournaments.
A pro can be beat. It's just a little harder for us common bowlers to beat them.
--------------------
300 x 6 800 x 1
Proud new owner of lane #1
Buzzsaw C/2
Cobalt Bomb
Black Cherry Bomb
And the almighty
G-Force Line
The BUZZBOMB is Da-Bomb.
-
Seriously, do you people want some cheese to go with that 'whine'?
I've bowled in State Tourneys and large independently sponsored events where pros were entered (before I got my card). Sure, they kicked our collective arses on most occasions, but I did manage to beat some of them in the brackets and make a little cash along the way.
It's all a state of mind. Bowling against those guys should bring out the best in you, not make you want to suck your thumb and cry.
Since those days I've bowled with and against the best in the world. All I remember thinking was, "Make him know you belong out here." At least when I get beaten by the best, I can honestly say I was beaten by the BEST the bowling world has to offer.
Grow up and grow a pair.
--------------------
ScolaÃ
)O(
I'm Not Fluent In Idiot So Please Speak Slowly & Clearly
-
Tell you what .. next time one of these TOURING PROS enters an amateur tournament I'll put him up in all the brackets .. I'm a REAL GAMBLER



--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
-
Our State and Local tournaments allow any sanctioned bowlers to bowl if they have a specified number of games in the association. Pros are allowed, but the number of them on a team is limited and no two pros can be doubles partners.
I happen to agree that the pros pay the same membership dues and therefore should be allowed the same rights as other bowlers.
--------------------
USBC Bronze Coach
"I cannot change the direction of the wind but I can adjust my sails to reach my destination." Jimmy Dean
Quaker 10/93 - 4/07
Quaker (http://"http://thongprincess.bowlspace.com/gallery/view_gallery.one?gal_id=1")
-
quote:
But get this, I have to bowl against Mike & Mark Scroggins & Mr 900 Jeff Campbell in our city tournaments.
A pro can be beat. It's just a little harder for us common bowlers to beat them.
Next time you see Jeff Campbell tell him there is a guy in New Castle that wants to show him his tumor...
Ahh
PS do this he will laugh his a@@ off.
--------------------
'I'm Partial to the Fugue' - Radar O'Reilly
-
quote:
Pro's are pro's for a reason, and the local State and City tourney are for the local bowlers, not emempt touring pros that make $150,000 throwing 6 strikes.
Most of the PBA exempt pros did not make $100,000/yr much less per event, and I bet a good proportion of them did not make $50,000/yr.
Here's the problem from a local assoc. view. If you keep the "masters" tournament closed to only local/city bowlers then your entries will be lower. When your entries are lower your prize fund is lower. When you have local high level bowlers looking for a tournament they want high prize fund. But they also don't want to pay over $100 to get in. So at the local level there's a dilema.
Do we open the tournament up and possibly get some PBA players but get more bowlers.
Or keep it city only and keep the prize fund down?
What do you folks want? Higher participation and the chance at bigger better bowlers or smaller field with lower prize funds?
Or do you just want to eliminante any one that has a PBA card regional or otherwise? If you do that, it will lower local participation and of course prize fund.
Erin
-
I thought this was incredibly ironic: last week I did the same state tournament with a different doubles partner, and bowled next to Johnny Petraglia, Sr.
-
quote:
Tell you what .. next time one of these TOURING PROS enters an amateur tournament I'll put him up in all the brackets .. I'm a REAL GAMBLER


--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O
So where does it list the State tournament as an "amateur" event? If it were truly an amateur event, then the pros wouldn't even be allowed to bowl. It's a Sate tournament, and as as member of the state USBC, he has every right to enter that tournament. He's lived there all his life. Get over it.
--------------------
First one to leave 15 ten pins wins!
-
No Problem ... let me know when the games are run again .. if one of the Pros are entered .. I'll send you some money to enter them in brackets .. I know it's a gamble .. but I feel LUCKY already! Thanks!
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
J O E - F A L C O