win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: urethane vs. reactive  (Read 1627 times)

thewhiz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
urethane vs. reactive
« on: May 17, 2017, 12:22:21 PM »
Which one soaks up oil and which one moves oil around on the lane

 

amyers2002

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
Re: urethane vs. reactive
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2017, 12:31:33 PM »
Depends,

Plastic rolls straighter but is more likely to chip

Urethane hooks more but lasts better.

Myself I prefer plastic for rev dominate bowlers and balanced bowlers who can't straighten out their wrists.

Urethane for bowlers that are speed dominate and the little bit of hook wont hurt.

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: urethane vs. reactive
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2017, 01:16:45 PM »
Plastic is less porous, so it will deposit more oil down lane. Urethane is more porous, so it will remove more oil than plastic.

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: urethane vs. reactive
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2017, 01:26:56 PM »
Dead on ^^

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: urethane vs. reactive
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2017, 01:29:24 PM »
Also when plastic/urethane is used often, it causes the downlane motion to become more unpredictable do to the deposit of oil being spread all over the lane, as opposed to being removed; Which is why these balls are SO CONDITIONAL and shot specific.

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: urethane vs. reactive
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2017, 01:46:29 PM »
Which one soaks up oil and which one moves oil around on the lane

IN GENERAL,

 Reactives soak up more oil than urethanes.

 Urethanes move oil around and downlane a lot more than reactives.
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.