I think someone is blowing this way out of proportion. First of all, there are many ways to change your normal delivery that are, and should be legal. For example, a few years ago I was bowling in a trio league. One night, for whatever reason, the lanes were exceedingly oily (later found out the machine broke and dumped about 5x the amount of oil they wanted on the lanes), my teammate who normally uses a 4 step approach, began using a 1 step approach to reduce his ball speed. Obviously a large change from his "normal" delivery. Should we have forfeited the game because of that? What about someone going from 4 step to a 6 step delivery to generate more ball speed on a drier condition?
The intent of this rule is this:
Once a bowler begins a league season with a particular hand, they must stay with that hand. Those that are fortunate enough to be able to bowl with both hands get upset, but from a USBC standpoint, it would be like bringing in a totally new bowler to shoot 1 frame or part of one frame. You wouldn't allow that, so why allow someone to switch hands.
Also, it is designed to stop super-obvious sandbagging, the person throwing every ball for the last game between their legs, etc. But most true sandbaggers aren't that obvious anyway.
--------------------
Jorge300
"Some time, when the crew is up against it, and the breaks are beating the boys, tell 'em to get out there and give it all they've got. And win just one for the Zipper. I don't know where I'll be then Doc, he said. But I won't smell too good, that's for sure."