win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Worst ball of 2016, and why  (Read 5305 times)

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Worst ball of 2016, and why
« on: January 20, 2017, 07:36:41 PM »
Come on, friends. Which ball did you drill this year that makes you wonder why you put holes in that turd? 100 different surfaces, 3 drills, and 12 different houses, and it just didn't suit you at all.

Bonus points for mentioning if you gave it away and someone went and WRECKED with it.

 

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2017, 09:29:00 PM »
Without a doubt the Storm Phase, a very expensive spare/ urethane ball.

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2017, 09:52:16 PM »

Quote from Steven:

The Hammer Scandal !!
 
I honestly tried. I made surface adjustments from 500 to 4000 grit. I've used it on fresh and second shift THS conditions in different houses. I've used it on different sport conditions, most recently 47' Statue of Liberty. Disappointing is an understatement.
 
The ball rolls very early, and recovery in the forward transition from oil to friction is sub-par. I've seen a few high speed THS bowlers have some success with the Scandal bouncing it off the side wall friction, but that's not what I bought the ball for.

I just bowled league this past Monday, and there were 4 people on my lanes with this ball, scoring like crazy!!! WOW! Go figure!

 
Like I said, I've seen some league bowlers have some success with the Scandal too. I've also taken mine up to 4000 and it worked OK on our THS. That's fine, but there are many mid-range balls that work as well or better on a THS. The Scandal's little brother, the Solid Rebel, is just one example. That's one fun ball to throw!!
 
I'm talking about the performance of the ball on it's intended condition, which is heavier/longer oil. It's not just me. I've seen many very good bowlers use the Scandal in my two sport shot leagues, and it almost always goes quickly back into their bags. 
 
A few weeks ago, I had my Scandal completely plugged and redrilled to my favorite Symmetric pattern, and at least in practice, it's rolling better. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. Still, I have many oilers in my rotation (3 Gurus, The Mix, and a Marvel-S) that perform much better in heavy oil. I just got a Pitbull drilled up and will throw it for the first time in practice tomorrow opposite the Scandal. 
 
But as you say, go figure.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2017, 10:13:09 AM by Steven »

Jesse James

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2017, 11:31:55 AM »

Quote from Steven:

The Hammer Scandal !!
 
I honestly tried. I made surface adjustments from 500 to 4000 grit. I've used it on fresh and second shift THS conditions in different houses. I've used it on different sport conditions, most recently 47' Statue of Liberty. Disappointing is an understatement.
 
The ball rolls very early, and recovery in the forward transition from oil to friction is sub-par. I've seen a few high speed THS bowlers have some success with the Scandal bouncing it off the side wall friction, but that's not what I bought the ball for.

I just bowled league this past Monday, and there were 4 people on my lanes with this ball, scoring like crazy!!! WOW! Go figure!

 
Like I said, I've seen some league bowlers have some success with the Scandal too. I've also taken mine up to 4000 and it worked OK on our THS. That's fine, but there are many mid-range balls that work as well or better on a THS. The Scandal's little brother, the Solid Rebel, is just one example. That's one fun ball to throw!!
 
I'm talking about the performance of the ball on it's intended condition, which is heavier/longer oil. It's not just me. I've seen many very good bowlers use the Scandal in my two sport shot leagues, and it almost always goes quickly back into their bags. 
 
A few weeks ago, I had my Scandal completely plugged and redrilled to my favorite Symmetric pattern, and at least in practice, it's rolling better. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. Still, I have many oilers in my rotation (3 Gurus, The Mix, and a Marvel-S) that perform much better in heavy oil. I just got a Pitbull drilled up and will throw it for the first time in practice tomorrow opposite the Scandal. 
 
But as you say, go figure.

So, the Scandal is a ball for heavy oil? If so, than that would explain the adjustments that I made to be able to score in our third game. I went to the extreme right of all four of these folks with a hybrid piece, more pearlized than solid!
Some days you're the bug....some days you're the windshield...that's bowling!

J_w73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2540
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2017, 02:43:55 PM »
I don't know what year the Motiv Graffiti Tag was made, but it was the worse ball I owned in 2016.

Worst ball I have seen from Motiv.  I tried to like it and use it, but it was always a disappointment and never really worked well for anything. Gave it away for a beer.
375 RPM, 17-18 MPH, 45+ DEG AXIS ROTATION, 17 DEG TILT

pears

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2017, 05:15:33 PM »
I don't know what year the Motiv Graffiti Tag was made, but it was the worse ball I owned in 2016.

Worst ball I have seen from Motiv.  I tried to like it and use it, but it was always a disappointment and never really worked well for anything. Gave it away for a beer.

Two guys in my league use the Tag and bowl pretty well with it, one of them being my uncle and the other is the centers PSO.
Snap lock-16
Code black-16
Eternal cell-16

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2017, 05:32:07 PM »

So, the Scandal is a ball for heavy oil? If so, than that would explain the adjustments that I made to be able to score in our third game. I went to the extreme right of all four of these folks with a hybrid piece, more pearlized than solid!

 
Yes indeed... 
 
At least that's the way Hammer markets the Scandal. On the Hammer site, they say it's the strongest hooking Hammer ball ever produced. I should have known better after buying the Hammer Deadly Aim. The company should have issued a recall and apologized after releasing that round wonder.
 
I don't want to rag any further on the Scandal. I threw it again today in a practice session after the complete plug and redrill, and I see a place for it on my second shift THS league. I think it will fill a nice medium condition niche where I need to move further in and tighter on a breaking down condition. But I don't see it matching the marketing hype, which is why I bought the ball in the first place. It's a disappointment, but I'd like to remove it from my list of the "worst ball of 2016". It's not that bad.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2017, 06:16:25 PM by Steven »

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8152
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2017, 05:34:14 PM »
I don't know what year the Motiv Graffiti Tag was made, but it was the worse ball I owned in 2016.

Worst ball I have seen from Motiv.  I tried to like it and use it, but it was always a disappointment and never really worked well for anything. Gave it away for a beer.

Two guys in my league use the Tag and bowl pretty well with it, one of them being my uncle and the other is the centers PSO.

Probably why this should be titled "Worst Ball Of 2016 For You, And Why".

Almost every ball that someone hates, another will love.
_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

milorafferty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11153
  • I have a name, therefore no preferred pronouns.
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2017, 05:38:01 PM »
I don't know what year the Motiv Graffiti Tag was made, but it was the worse ball I owned in 2016.

Worst ball I have seen from Motiv.  I tried to like it and use it, but it was always a disappointment and never really worked well for anything. Gave it away for a beer.

Two guys in my league use the Tag and bowl pretty well with it, one of them being my uncle and the other is the centers PSO.

Probably why this should be titled "Worst Ball Of 2016 For You, And Why".

Almost every ball that someone hates, another will love.

Agreed, if the Tag was a total loser, it would never have made it out of development.
"If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

"If you don't stand for our flag, then don't expect me to give a damn about your feelings."

Ken De Beasto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
Re: Worst ball of 2016, and why
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2017, 05:21:05 AM »
I don't know what year the Motiv Graffiti Tag was made, but it was the worse ball I owned in 2016.

Worst ball I have seen from Motiv.  I tried to like it and use it, but it was always a disappointment and never really worked well for anything. Gave it away for a beer.

Two guys in my league use the Tag and bowl pretty well with it, one of them being my uncle and the other is the centers PSO.

Probably why this should be titled "Worst Ball Of 2016 For You, And Why".

Almost every ball that someone hates, another will love.

Agreed, if the Tag was a total loser, it would never have made it out of development.

Dang it Milo u suckered me into buying that tag because so cheap sniff sniff  :'( ;)