win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)  (Read 5744 times)

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)
« on: April 17, 2004, 06:09:41 AM »
Edit: 7/10/04 9:00 PM

After discussion with Action Man, I feel I must correct any misconceptions I may have allowed to permeate this thread.

While I have been disappointed in that I could not get my The Answer to work, that does not mean many other LaneMasters balls may not be suitable for someone else. It is just my ball and I suppose any number of things may have happened to it on its way from production to my hands. That is the sole reason I felt I cannot recommend any Lanemasters balls. Perhaps it's best if that statement be edited out until I get this straightened out. Thanks for your understanding.
---------------------------------------------------

Ok, I got sucked into (so far that's the evaluation) the hype. I went a bought a 3" pin, 15 lb The Answer; drilled it medium-strong, 4"x5" for yours truly.

The ball comes with as high a gloss as I have ever seen on any ball. I'd guess-timate it at about 3000-4000 grit sanding with a very high gloss polish. This is, in my experience, a VERY fine grit with a VERY high gloss polish.

It hooked MAYBE 2 boards more than my Blue Dot on very dry conditions. I used on a veyr dry cndition and embarassed myself because I did not use it before hand and test it in order to establish some parameters. I either went thru the nose or left washout on very dry conditions. I put it away and finsihed ith my Blue Dot. Bad night anyway.

So I sanded it to roughly 1000 grit with a grey Scotch Brite Pad and then polished it to about 1500 grit, maybe 1200 grit. Now it moved maybe 4-5 boards more than my Blue Dot. I tried it in practice but didn't dare to use it in league.

The ball came to be directly from Lane Masters with abnormal but extremely logical directions to polish or sand as needed to get the desired reaction (as if I have not been preaching that for years here at br.com.)  I feel it is necessary to use a ball as it comes to see what the manufacturers planned reaction is. Seeing as how both BJI and BTM both reviewed this ball as being for Medium-Oil patterns, YET with neither of them mentioning having changed the surface at all PLUS my normal release making any ball seem much more powerful than the average bowler finds them, I remain mystified at "The Answwr"'s lack of even medium-light or even dry performance parameters.

What the ______!

I will next try to sand it to 600 then polish lightly and see what happens.

So far it "does not work for me"!


--------------------
"We get old too fast, and too late, smart."


Edited on 4/17/2004 9:02 PM

Edited on 7/10/2004 9:16 PM
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

 

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
Re: Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)
« Reply #16 on: June 05, 2004, 07:43:57 PM »
Typo Charles?  200 grit?

It really sounds like you got a bad ball.  My urethane Gargoyle feels slimy after throwing it some.  Even my weakest resins never feel that way.  I'm sure it's not as easy as the major brands, but have you attempted to contact their customer service department to see about a possible replacement?  The only Lanemaster ball I've seen was a Carbide particle, and it hooked as advertised.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)
« Reply #17 on: June 06, 2004, 04:50:58 AM »
quote:
Typo Charles?  200 grit?


Yes, typo. Apologies; I edited it.

quote:

It really sounds like you got a bad ball.  My urethane Gargoyle feels slimy after throwing it some.


It would because urethane and plastic (actually polyester) balls absorb oil at a rate significantly below that of resins. Not a small percentage but by factors.

quote:

Even my weakest resins never feel that way.  I'm sure it's not as easy as the major brands, but have you attempted to contact their customer service department to see about a possible replacement?  The only Lanemaster ball I've seen was a Carbide particle, and it hooked as advertised.
--------------------
Penn State Proud



Maybe I should since my ball, purchased thru Buddies, came directly from LaneMasters.
--------------------
"We get old too fast, and too late, smart."
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
Re: Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2004, 07:32:59 PM »
quote:
It would because urethane and plastic (actually polyester) balls absorb oil at a rate significantly below that of resins. Not a small percentage but by factors.


That's kind of what I was getting at.  Maybe the cover on your Answer is actually urethane, not resin.  Maybe someone for got to add the resin at the right step, or maybe all together.  I would attempt to get a replacement.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)
« Reply #19 on: August 04, 2004, 09:22:03 AM »
Strider,

I finally talked to the Legends/Lanemasters people, yesterday, Tuesday, 8/3. They said they only made one "The Answer" and they felt I just got a bad ball. To make it up to me, to make a customer satisfied, they will be sending me one of their new balls. I had a choice of The New Standard or the Yeah, Baby! (see the reason for that name in another post that I just answered today titled, "New Lanemasters Balls"). Since the New Standard was slightly longer, I chose that.


--------------------
"We get old too fast, and too late, smart."
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
Re: Lane Masters: The Answer (initial use)
« Reply #20 on: August 04, 2004, 11:46:38 AM »
I'm glad they are making things right.  I hope the new ball works out well.  Keep us posted.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive