BallReviews

General Category => PBA => Topic started by: Necromancer on November 25, 2007, 05:31:05 AM

Title: 151 - 160
Post by: Necromancer on November 25, 2007, 05:31:05 AM
Yeah I know the lane condition is hard.  Yeah I have bowled in PBA patterns and even harder patterns.  Yeah they are all better than me.  But let's get serious.  You can bowl better than 151 and 160 just throwing it straight.  I bet if WRW was on the show and had 100 games to bowl, he still wouldn't bowl no 160.  That was truly embarrassing for professional bowling today.  

The only person I respect on the whole telecast as a legitamate elite bowler / athlete is Robert Smith.

DISCUSS!
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Hammer Black Widow
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 SuperBeast
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Brunswick Target Spare Zone
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Fall/Winter Sub 2007 213.000; Fall/Winter Season 2006 206.467; 2006-07 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Dan Belcher on November 25, 2007, 01:39:16 PM
I shot a 111 once on the Shark pattern in my PBA Experience league over the summer.  I would have done better by throwing my plastic ball straight at the pocket, but knowing my luck I'd leave an 8-10 or 7-9 every time I did that.

(For what it's worth, the Shark is the only pattern I've never been able to figure out.  I shot a couple 200 games on it, but most were in the 160 range.  Over/under reaction and horrible carry no matter what I did)
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: shelley on November 25, 2007, 01:54:10 PM
I thought it was a good match and not embarrassing at all.  Shows that they're human too.

Why didn't they just point it at the pocket and take 9/ to the bank?  If they knew their opponent would shoot <160, I'd bet money that's what they'd've done.  But you gotta keep trying to strike, because you never know when the other guy is going to figure something out.  Brad just came off of 500+ for two games, the right adjustment could mean another four or five bagger.  Chris is just phenomenally talented and is liable to figure it out too.  You gotta keep trying to find something because the other guy just might find it too.

It would have been an awesome feat for one to just decide to take the straight game and live with the weak 10s, truly gutsy, but I don't fault either one for trying to stick with what could have started working at any time.

SH
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: loose5682 on November 25, 2007, 02:12:19 PM
Because they also weren't just bowling for one game, i can MAYBE understand the "fire it at the pocket and go 9/" logic if they're in the championship game, but remember, not only were they trying to win that game, but they were trying to still get, and stay, lined up for the championship game.

And no, that's not thinking too far ahead, that's just being smart.
--------------------
Andrew Loose

1/2 of ABT's Finest

"Strike for show, spare for dough, split for D'OH!"
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: nd300 on November 25, 2007, 02:13:12 PM
There's no doubting that Brad played the line great in the first two games,the ran into a huge breakdown in the third game.His gourth game wasn't too bad either,with the ball change that he made.
 Personally,the line and ball change that Mika made seemed to make the lanes look almost too easy,given the pro bowler's ability to repeat shots.
--------------------
Chris
 Lane#1--nothing else hits like 'em.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: cpo_bee on November 25, 2007, 02:41:03 PM
I lost even more respect for Barnes at the end of this game.  He was making HORRIBLE shots and at the end was whining about not breaking down even one split.  Maybe if he would have manned up and bowled better he wouldn't have had to worry about luck.  The man has an incredible game and a ten cent head, I'll start calling him Nuke Laloosh (sp?).
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Necromancer on November 25, 2007, 04:06:17 PM
quote:
I lost even more respect for Barnes at the end of this game.  He was making HORRIBLE shots and at the end was whining about not breaking down even one split.  Maybe if he would have manned up and bowled better he wouldn't have had to worry about luck.  The man has an incredible game and a ten cent head, I'll start calling him Nuke Laloosh (sp?).


I agree man.  I used to support Barnes and considered him a top 3 or top 5 bowler.  But I don't think he is choking.  I just think he isn't that good anymore.  He has been using the same game his whole career (mostly straight, fast, with lots of spin, and about 2 boards from the 20).  He needs to change something.  He just looks terrible on TV nowadays.  

I hope Robert Smith can be on TV for a long time.  He represents everything fun and good about bowling at the highest level.
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Hammer Black Widow
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 SuperBeast
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Brunswick Target Spare Zone
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Fall/Winter Sub 2007 213.000; Fall/Winter Season 2006 206.467; 2006-07 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Xfest on November 25, 2007, 04:10:11 PM
I believe Brad deserved it today, but the better man did win. Angelo was the best I've ever seen him on TV. He did great.
--------------------
http://www.kennyskidmorebowling.com
Stand left, throw it right, and strap it like a trojan!!
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: MegaMav on November 25, 2007, 04:12:29 PM
I believe, unless you were there bowling on it, you have no right to criticize the scores.
--------------------
BowlingChat.net (http://"http://www.bowlingchat.net") - "Welcome to the Underground"
BowlingWiki.net (http://"http://www.bowlingwiki.net") - "Where Bowlers Write History"
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Russell on November 25, 2007, 04:14:27 PM
quote:
Yeah I know the lane condition is hard.  Yeah I have bowled in PBA patterns and even harder patterns.  Yeah they are all better than me.  But let's get serious.  You can bowl better than 151 and 160 just throwing it straight.  I bet if WRW was on the show and had 100 games to bowl, he still wouldn't bowl no 160.  That was truly embarrassing for professional bowling today.  

The only person I respect on the whole telecast as a legitamate elite bowler / athlete is Robert Smith.

DISCUSS!
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Hammer Black Widow
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 SuperBeast
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Brunswick Target Spare Zone
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Fall/Winter Sub 2007 213.000; Fall/Winter Season 2006 206.467; 2006-07 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001



You're an idiot....discuss
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/rlrussell

The artist formerly known as "jabroni"
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Crankenstein300 on November 25, 2007, 04:22:30 PM
Until you've bowled a single game on a broken in TV pair for the dollars, you may want to rethink your whole "legitamate" bowler opinion.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Let It Bleed on November 25, 2007, 04:26:54 PM
quote:
quote:
Yeah I know the lane condition is hard.  Yeah I have bowled in PBA patterns and even harder patterns.  Yeah they are all better than me.  But let's get serious.  You can bowl better than 151 and 160 just throwing it straight.  I bet if WRW was on the show and had 100 games to bowl, he still wouldn't bowl no 160.  That was truly embarrassing for professional bowling today.  

The only person I respect on the whole telecast as a legitamate elite bowler / athlete is Robert Smith.

DISCUSS!
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Hammer Black Widow
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 SuperBeast
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Brunswick Target Spare Zone
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Fall/Winter Sub 2007 213.000; Fall/Winter Season 2006 206.467; 2006-07 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001



You're an idiot....discuss


LOL!

quote:
I agree man. I used to support Barnes and considered him a top 3 or top 5 bowler. But I don't think he is choking. I just think he isn't that good anymore.


He must be not good on Thursdays and Fridays as well...because I guess 3 shows in a row are what 'people who just don't have it anymore' tend to do


--------------------
"Chicks dig the trip 4" -Randy Pederson

Edited on 11/25/2007 5:27 PM
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: MAJM on November 25, 2007, 04:41:16 PM
quote:
The only person I respect on the whole telecast as a legitamate elite bowler / athlete is Robert Smith.


Robert Smith is better than I will ever be, but grip it and rip it is not talent.
--------------------
Boston Red Sox
Boston Celtics
New England Patriots
Boston Bruins

CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.900global.com
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: NicholasE on November 25, 2007, 04:55:11 PM
quote:
quote:
The only person I respect on the whole telecast as a legitamate elite bowler / athlete is Robert Smith.


Robert Smith is better than I will ever be, but grip it and rip it is not talent.
--------------------
Boston Red Sox
Boston Celtics
New England Patriots
Boston Bruins

CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.900global.com


You have to have some aiming skills?
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Dean Richards on November 25, 2007, 05:03:57 PM
He played the lanes as anybody would with his rev rate. I was thinking that Barnes could have done that. He is very capable of it. As far as "grip and rip isn't talent" your an idiot. He is former junior and adult team usa along with all those titles because of his talent.
--------------------
Lindenwood University
Junior Team USA 2008
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: MAJM on November 25, 2007, 05:04:00 PM
quote:
You have to have some aiming skills?


True, which Robert has being a pro. But to basically say that the only person on todays show that is an elite bowler is Robert is a joke. Lofting the ball over the left gutter isn't talent. It's a last resort.
--------------------
Boston Red Sox
Boston Celtics
New England Patriots
Boston Bruins

CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.900global.com
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: MAJM on November 25, 2007, 05:06:31 PM
quote:
He played the lanes as anybody would with his rev rate. I was thinking that Barnes could have done that. He is very capable of it. As far as "grip and rip isn't talent" your an idiot. He is former junior and adult team usa along with all those titles because of his talent.
--------------------
Lindenwood University
Junior Team USA 2008



I didn't say Robert wasn't a talent. Look at what I said, I said grip it and rip it isn't talent. What I said has nothing to do with Robert. I responded to the first post that the only elite bowler on the show was Robert based on the fact he threw it over the left gutter in a grip it a rip it style.
--------------------
Boston Red Sox
Boston Celtics
New England Patriots
Boston Bruins

CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.900global.com

Edited on 11/25/2007 6:06 PM
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: tonybowls on November 25, 2007, 05:11:55 PM
Lofting the gutter cap today for Smith was the best way for him to win. Sure other guys can do it but Smith is ridiculously versatile and he can play the lanes a myriad of different ways.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: baseballfrk8998 on November 25, 2007, 07:22:00 PM
quote:
quote:
You have to have some aiming skills?


True, which Robert has being a pro. But to basically say that the only person on todays show that is an elite bowler is Robert is a joke. Lofting the ball over the left gutter isn't talent. It's a last resort.
--------------------
Boston Red Sox
Boston Celtics
New England Patriots
Boston Bruins

CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.900global.com


It wasn't a last resort, it's how he plays the lanes. You've got to be kidding me. With 550+ revs, throwing it up the right side would be a last resort. Lol.
--------------------
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c238/baseballfrk8998/MyArsenal.jpg

Click my link and tell me what you think. Please.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: renoatpikeville on November 25, 2007, 07:24:59 PM
quote:
I believe, unless you were there bowling on it, you have no right to criticize the scores.
--------------------
BowlingChat.net (http://"http://www.bowlingchat.net") - "Welcome to the Underground"
BowlingWiki.net (http://"http://www.bowlingwiki.net") - "Where Bowlers Write History"




I second MegaMav.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: shelley on November 25, 2007, 07:34:08 PM
quote:
It wasn't a last resort, it's how he plays the lanes. You've got to be kidding me. With 550+ revs, throwing it up the right side would be a last resort. Lol.


Like all the best bowlers, they play the lanes as the lanes want to be played.  If that means the right side, that's what he plays.  If that means 7th arrow, that's what he does.  He can play where he wants to.  550+ revs aren't necessarily a problem if you throw it 20+ mph, it's about matching your speed to your revs to the lanes.  Robert is good enough to do those things.

SH
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: MAJM on November 25, 2007, 08:22:09 PM
quote:
LOL.... can you hit the 35 board over the gutter cap repeatedly and carry?  
"Talent = a special natural ability or aptitude" OR "Skill = is the learnt capacity or talent to carry out pre-determined results"


quote:
It wasn't a last resort, it's how he plays the lanes. You've got to be kidding me. With 550+ revs, throwing it up the right side would be a last resort. Lol.


Again people I'm not knocking Robert Smith AT ALL. I respect his abilities and the fact he is able to find areas to play that not many others can. That being said, I made my comments directed at Necromancer and the remark "The only person I respect on the whole telecast as a legitamate elite bowler / athlete is Robert Smith." Robert gets more "respect" because he played the lanes this way and everyone else on the telecast is a bum? And the fact that Necromancer would make this comment about Chris Barnes:
quote:
"I agree man. I used to support Barnes and considered him a top 3 or top 5 bowler. But I don't think he is choking. I just think he isn't that good anymore. He has been using the same game his whole career (mostly straight, fast, with lots of spin, and about 2 boards from the 20)."
Someone doesn't watch alot of bowling. Not good? Wow. Ask alot of bowlers if they would love to have the pro career that Barnes is having. It's not physical with Chris, just some weird mental issues.
--------------------
Boston Red Sox
Boston Celtics
New England Patriots
Boston Bruins

CHECK IT OUT!!!
http://www.900global.com
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: thegame on November 25, 2007, 08:29:55 PM
I knew a topic like this would come up, and sure enough it has.  Chris Barnes right now I'm sure is going over all the adjustments he had in mind that he didn't make and may have worked.  Brad Angelo must have been shaking is head that he won with a 160 game, but as a previous poster said, if you put 160 on the board before he bowls, Barnes beats it everytime, but that isn't the way it works.  Angelo and Barnes were basing every decision they made off of what was happening throughout the match.  If one of them had started a double, or 3 bagger, that completely would have changed the others thought process.  A 160 shot in league is more often than not, missed spares.  Barnes' 151 was all splits and washouts, another difference.  It is fun to watch and imagine how we would have adjusted and played the lanes, but to think that Barnes or Angelo are dropping those scores everytime they get lost is absurd.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: LuckyLefty on November 25, 2007, 08:35:26 PM
I only watched about 5 frames of this miserable transition game.

1.  Mika really found a shot outside with his Fury and would have been real dangerous if he went on.

2.  Chris Barnes really was throwing a beautiful shot(no mashes into the lane like he usually does when he loses) and I thought he needed a ball set up for backend and instead had a ball set up for midlane and seemed to not have much backend after a lot of midlane read.  He also had about as much bad luck as a person could have in five frames!  Luckily he is a pro and was able to get to 150!  

REgards,

Luckylefty
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: DON DRAPER on November 25, 2007, 08:43:54 PM
it's easy to criticize someone else when you're at home watching on tv but these guys tried what they thought would work best for their games.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Scolai on November 25, 2007, 08:53:01 PM
My first PBA cash was on Shark pattern.  It's not easy, but it does take the right touch and a high degree of accuracy.

I was a bit surprised by the scores on today's show.  Angelo was the beneficiary of the fact that Barnes sucks on TV lately, otherwise any other bowler would have sent him packing in the 3rd match.
--------------------
Namaste.
Scolaí
...
/|\


)O(
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: jbruno6 on November 25, 2007, 09:06:16 PM
Didn't Angelo shoot 265, 256?  Mika 233?
--------------------

A half ten is not a great shot.  No, you shouldn't have carried it.

www.jeterisanoverratedplayer.blogspot.com
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: TWOHAND834 on November 25, 2007, 09:30:03 PM
What make sme sick, are those that come on here and say that someone on tour has no accuracy just because of his rev rate.  Those are the same people that have no idea just how accurate you have to be to be successful out on Tour.  For the record, I believe that Robert Smith has a US Open to his credit and made the show of another one about 2 or 3 years ago.  Granted he threw it bad on that show.  But, so did TJ and he ended up winning because he carried a couple brooklyns.  Robert is not spray and pray people.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator

If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Dan Belcher on November 25, 2007, 09:48:28 PM
quote:
What make sme sick, are those that come on here and say that someone on tour has no accuracy just because of his rev rate.  Those are the same people that have no idea just how accurate you have to be to be successful out on Tour.  For the record, I believe that Robert Smith has a US Open to his credit and made the show of another one about 2 or 3 years ago.  Granted he threw it bad on that show.  But, so did TJ and he ended up winning because he carried a couple brooklyns.  Robert is not spray and pray people.
Absolutely.  You can take a look at where his ball landed after lofting it--he never missed his target at the arrows by more than a board the entire match basically, and it always landed at the same distance.  Incredible accuracy for such a high rev rate!
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Necromancer on November 26, 2007, 04:33:52 AM
Just because I am watching from home doesn't make it 'illegal' for me to criticize.  I know how tough the lanes are but I am not a pro.  If these are truly the best of the best in the world, it would only be logical for them to change a gameplan.  For Barnes in particular to continue messing up with right lane with splits just shows no logical strategy.  Throw it straight or something.  In every other sport you don't see a team or a player continue using just one strategy when it isn't working.  In football you see a team go toward passing when the run isn't there.  In basketball you see a team put different players out on the court to match up better.  In golf you see Tiger Woods change a club to compensate for conditions.  It just seems like bowlers have this "only 12 frames" mentality that they have to stick with just 1 ball throughout the match and if it doesn't work, then it doesn't work.  It just makes no sense when there is so much on the line.

The reason I respect Robert Smith is because he is the most versatile out of all of them.  As for me not watching enough or whatever is also ignorant.  I have bowled with these people and have been to telecasts (not just sitting on the couch watching it).  Also, making the telecast 3 straight weeks is good but not great.  You don't win by just making it to the telecast.

And yes again, they are all better than me by far.  And yes again, I never said I'd do better.
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Hammer Black Widow
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 SuperBeast
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Brunswick Target Spare Zone
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Fall/Winter Sub 2007 213.000; Fall/Winter Season 2006 206.467; 2006-07 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001


Edited on 11/26/2007 5:36 AM
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: scotts33 on November 26, 2007, 05:33:23 AM
I can see bowling proprietors everywhere wincing as Maximum Bob cleared the heads with his deep inside line.  Ouch!!!  Especially those owners with old wood as kids balls everywhere will be double bouncing on the soft pines.  Geez!

As far as Robert being the most versatile I'd disagree.  Duke, WRW and a few others I think of as versatile.  Smith can be shut out lots of time when his high rev style doesn't match up. Great bowler none the less..wows the kids with his revs as pchee wowed the chicks with his.  

Give me Gary Dickenson.  
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: tdub36tjt on November 26, 2007, 05:51:52 AM
The thing I didn't understand about Chrus Barnes yesterday was that he never even tried a ball change. (I still don't think that was a Rival even though pba.com says it was). But that is besides the point. If you move left and the ball doesn't come up and you aren't using a stronger piece (which it was obvious the ball he was using wasn't very strong), why wouldn't you try a stronger ball from that same line.

He had tried a line further to the right with no success the whole beginning of the match. I can see why he would continue with that ball on the right lane because he was striking SOME. But try a ball change on the left lane I thought it was fairly obvious he needed more ball and to get deeper on the left lane. That line he was playing just was too much over under making it an extremly tight line with little to no carry.

It appeared to me that he was being stubborn and just thought there was no way he was playing the wrong line and that he was just getting robbed. Maybe he made that decision because everyone says he overthinks it. The guy has made a great career on making great adjustments and making shots, but I think he doesn't trust himself while on TV. I think if he just trusted what he was thinking he would be much better off. I just have a hard time believing he made all the adjustments he thought might work. I bet he second guessed some adjustment ideas and ignored them when they very well might have worked. Just my opinion.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Fluff E Bunnie on November 26, 2007, 07:12:33 AM
Hmm...  For those criticizing Smith I wonder about that.  I watched every shot he did (when the cameras weren't showing some stupid irrelevant angle) and it seemed like he was hitting that same spot on every single shot and his ball reaction looked great.  

I thought Angelo did great but I figured Smith would beat him unless he had a split problem.

Barnes...  Ugh.  I am starting to get tired of watching this guy sulk and whine.  

With Mika, damn he had a nice look once he figured it out.  I would have liked to have seen him vs. Smith.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: The SuperHitMan on November 26, 2007, 07:38:37 AM
The way people are talking its never a good show when the advantage is to the "Rob Smiths" of the tour and the straight players couldn't hit water if they fell outta boat.


Straighter isn't always greater.



--------------------
Founder of H Phi H

Member of Hoss Central Inc

-Ive been called Cocky and Arrogant thorughout my career...Being humble is alright and all but I prefer to Shut my critics up and Shut'em Down and if that makes me Cocky and Arrogant then  I am what I am- K.C.D

I don't care if my signature is long. Deal with it.







Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Fluff E Bunnie on November 26, 2007, 07:41:11 AM
quote:
The way people are talking its never a good show when the advantage is to the "Rob Smiths" of the tour and the straight players couldn't hit water if they fell outta boat.

Straighter isn't always greater.



Well, look at what Mika had but it was too late.  Unfortunately, we will never know what would have happened if Mika would have gotten there.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Myrrodin on November 26, 2007, 04:45:20 PM
Since nobody is really defending Ritchie Allen, I would just like to throw something out there.  Ritchie could have bowled a 200 from where he was at by catching a string or a couple of doubles, but he was forced to move.  Angelo started with the front five, and Ritchie had poor carry.  That means he has to try and move to make his ball carry so that he could win the match.  This is why he got lost and shot 160.  Anyone who has ever moved to try and find carry knows how easy it is to lose the pocket, especially on a difficult pattern.

As for everyone else, you have to look at what they are trying to do.  When you are bowling for a title like that, you either need to out execute your opponents from the same area, or find a look they don't have.  Mika trying for the different look option since he has great control of loft and that is probably where he played much of the week, but he had to adjust his look and by then it was too late with Angelo bowling so well.  Chris Barnes could have gone in, but I don't think he could have gotten the same look as Angelo due to how Brad throws the ball, and he obviously didn't like his look from inside.  Plus, after seeing Mika figure out an outside shot, he probably felt there would be something out there for him to find, and this would also give him a different look against Robert Smith.  Unfortunately for him, it didn't pan out.  Smith likely decided after seeing two straight players struggle (except the later part of Mika's game) and with his rev rate and physical abilities, he should get in, but he should find a different part of the inside.  He did so, and guessed right.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Platinum Bowler on November 26, 2007, 04:52:43 PM
You got to love all the lines about not being able to criticize because you have never been in their position! Haha!
--------------------
B-Car
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: BrianCRX90 on November 26, 2007, 04:59:43 PM
I think it's refreshing every now and then to see a brutal low scoring match by both bowlers. When it's like that, the game becomes a chess match and a thinking man's pattern opposed to only outscoring your opponent by racking a bunch of strikes in a row.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: TWOHAND834 on November 26, 2007, 05:18:29 PM
Necro,

You are right.  It is not "illegal" to criticize.  But, in todays world, when you do criticize someone, you almost tend to get more in return.  My remarks had to do with someone who mentioned on this topic, that "grip it and rip it is not talent".  IMO, you have to be physically talented in order to throw it the way he does.  He rips the bejesus out of it.  But, at the same time, he is in total control over his body and pretty solid at the line.  He does not fall over himself trying to get the rev rate.I made one remark about Eugene's "f" bomb and I got alot of crap for it.  It just happens I am afraid.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator

If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: ccrider on November 26, 2007, 05:24:17 PM
Everyone should know that sometimes the lanes with a fresh pattern start off playable, get difficult after a few games due to carry down and players pushing oil all over the place, and then, as the continue to transition, become easier and easier to play.

Not saying that this justifies a 150 or 160 from the elite players in the game, but I sure as H understand it.

By the way, my 10 year old son watched the match with me. He said he could have won that game.
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: novawagonmaster on November 26, 2007, 08:41:32 PM
quote:


By the way, my 10 year old son watched the match with me. He said he could have won that game.


Yeah, I bet alot of hacks said the same thing!
I bowl with a ton of guys who just don't know what they don't know, and yet they flat out refuse bowl a PBA experience league to find out.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.


Edited on 11/26/2007 9:41 PM
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: alcornel on November 26, 2007, 09:00:42 PM
And don't forget, if I remember right, Smith didn't miss one single pin spare during the week - so he has 'some' accuracy.
--------------------
Andy
Las Vegas, NV
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Necromancer on November 27, 2007, 01:02:56 PM
quote:
And don't forget, if I remember right, Smith didn't miss one single pin spare during the week - so he has 'some' accuracy.
--------------------
Andy
Las Vegas, NV


Yeah he was 45/45 during the week.  All these Smith haters just got skooled.
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Hammer Black Widow
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 SuperBeast
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Brunswick Target Spare Zone
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Fall/Winter Sub 2007 213.000; Fall/Winter Season 2006 206.467; 2006-07 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001
Title: Re: 151 - 160
Post by: Crankenstein300 on November 27, 2007, 01:20:57 PM
You have to base it off of more than 1 game on TV though. To be honest, I feel that Barnes is the most versatile of all the bowlers that were on the show. He ran into a bad game. It's not like Angelo beat him by 100 though. It's was just one of those lane transition games and in cases like that, you may feel like you can make smaller adjustments to grind out the win instead of making huge ball change or line moves.