BallReviews

General Category => PWBA => Topic started by: ClutchClay on July 07, 2003, 03:47:08 AM

Title: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: ClutchClay on July 07, 2003, 03:47:08 AM
Having heard both CD_s speak this phrase, am I the only one that thinks they are morons for saying it backwards (as opposed to Angle of Entry)?  Or am I the moron and they are saying it correctly?
--------------------
Regards, ClutchClay
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: ClutchClay on July 07, 2003, 06:51:11 PM
I am absolutely positive that I heard CDB say "entry of angle" once this past Sunday and the other CD say it twice last week.

I wish I had not deleted the show from my TiVo already so that I could double-check.
--------------------
Regards, ClutchClay
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: mumzie on July 07, 2003, 11:10:49 PM
I've heard it said every time I've watched the show. Entry of Angle.
--------------------
Bowling? Of course it's a sport.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: ClutchClay on July 08, 2003, 02:02:33 AM
It turns out that I did not delete this weeks show.  I just re-watched the last two matches and CDB says it while talking about Cara immediately prior to Cara's first shot in the tenth.

So, the question remains, is this phrase just flat out wrong?

And if so, where does that leave CDB's knowledge of the game if she can make that kind of error not once, but multiple times?

Sorry if I sound like I am harping on this so hard, but if the best that women's bowling has to offer speaks "bowling-ease" this poorly, what are the other PWBA members like?
--------------------
Regards, ClutchClay
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Jeffrevs on July 08, 2003, 07:03:32 AM
CDB seems like a great person, however, I personally thing there needs to be some improvement there......

for instance,.....

If they say SURFACE one for friggin' time on the PWBA show, I'm going to freak!

And....here's a good idea, why don't you tell us a little more about the oil pattern and /or what the oil information means when they announce it during the first game!  They may as well be speaking Chinese (no offense)!

Is it just me ?

--------------------
JEFF
Just chimin' in !
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: card79 on July 08, 2003, 08:03:40 AM
No Jeff I thought the same thing.  You tell us you are the first tour to use prodigy oil cause it is still in the experimental stage.  I am going wow that is great.  What the hell is prodigy oil.  Do they tell me no.  They go on to talking about shout outs to peoples moms.  What was up with the pattern not being symetrical.  Jan schmidt even opened the can of worms and the freaking answer was they are playing with the shot a little or something like that.  It drives me nuts.  I met a lot of the women the last time they had a tour stop at my home center.  They are so genuine and nice with knowledge you wouldn't believe.  Why are they so handcuffed on tv.  Inform us that is your job.
--------------------
I don't really play cards and I am not 79, but it fits together somehow.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Jeffrevs on July 08, 2003, 08:13:28 AM
frurstating eh Andy!
--------------------
JEFF
Just chimin' in !
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Bjaardker on July 08, 2003, 08:37:15 AM
Surface
Entry of Angle (terrible grammar)
Plastic Ball


Should all be on the "only able to say once per telecast" list. With "Entry of Angle" being on the "I not sound so smart so I won't say it" list. It's a simple case of verbal diarhhea, but saying it more than once is kind of ridiculous for a national telecast.

Andy, when Jan mentioned that the shot wasn't symmetrical CDB tried to give a quick explanation as to why, but unfortunatly it's just too big a topic to cover in 5 seconds. Which is all you've got when your list of shout outs & recognitions is 5 miles long.
There is a place for recognitions on the telecast. But, I feel there simply are too many in every telecast. That's what a "friends & family" portion of a website is for, to give recognition to people. Then again, I've seen very few PWBA bowlers with websites.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: card79 on July 08, 2003, 10:19:16 AM
Welcome Back MrsRevs.
--------------------
I don't really play cards and I am not 79, but it fits together somehow.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: seadrive on July 08, 2003, 10:38:12 AM
The sisters Dorin can be comical at times (the "entry of angle" thing makes me grind my teeth to little nubs), but I think the production quality of the show is actually better this year than in years past.  I guess that's pretty pathetic.

At least they've learned to say the words, "That was a bad shot."  Last year, every time someone didn't get a strike, they'd tell you how the lane is transitioning, and she'll have to make an adjustment.  Yeah, right.

Carolyn needs to stop bobbing her head up and down like a dashboard doll, and Cathy... well, she sure is cute!  I really wish I could have seen Jan Schmidt's face when Cathy called Kelly and Michelle "hookers".  hahahahahahaha!

Cathy's comments on making the 2-8-10 were priceless.  On one shot, she told us that you really have to hit it "perfect" to make it.  I don't know about you, but I'm still looking for that perfect spot.  Two frames later, she tells us that she's never seen it made, but she thinks a lefty might have a better shot at it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You can't make this stuff up!
--------------------
seadrive
Cogito ergo bowl
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: michelle on July 08, 2003, 10:42:29 AM

Mrsrevs...I wouldn't say it was a conspiracy, but I'm not going to quibble with what you opined on the source of problem.  

Personally, I feel there are players that would do really well on commentary but are not afforded that opportunity for various reasons that I should probably bite my tongue on...
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: seadrive on July 08, 2003, 11:43:36 AM
quote:
Which is all you've got when your list of shout outs & recognitions is 5 miles long. There is a place for recognitions on the telecast. But, I feel there simply are too many in every telecast.

The PWBA show is packaged very differently from the PBA show.  The PBA markets their show as great entertainment, something you can get pumped up about.  It's about drama and excitement.  "Only one can win", will it be Walter Ray again, or will PDW throw 3 in the clutch to snatch the victory?

As presented by Jan Schmidt, the PWBA is more about "women's issues" and presenting the ladies as athletes, than it is about entertainment.  You almost get the feeling that they don't really care if you find it entertaining, as long as they get to remind you every two minutes that the bowlers are athletes, female athletes.  Got it?  Good, but we're going to tell you again anyway.

The "shout outs" are just another symptom of the underlying problem.  Jan seems to think the show belongs to her and her friends, and she uses the air time as she sees fit.  Wishing your father and father-in-law Happy Father's Day was okay, but throwing out congrats to your husband's second-cousin-twice-removed's niece on her high school graduation is really a bit much, don't you think?
--------------------
seadrive
Cogito ergo bowl
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: HamPster on July 08, 2003, 12:20:54 PM
Yeah, the plastic ball thing, the oil pattern nonsense, all the broken phrases, surface, and the whole athletes thing is getting REALLY annoying.  Especially when they all hook their plastic ball and then we hear "It's all the excess OIL in the middle of a SPORT PATTERN that caused them to miss the 10."  Bullstuff.  If they'd throw it STRAIGHT, WENDY, they might pick more of them up.  Nobody knew what offense and defense oil was to begin with, so prodigy just means less than nothing.  Pattern length is about the only thing I can relate to, I still don't know what volume of oil means, they all look like they have head oil out the donkey and enough backend to make JLo jealous.  Then CDB says "It's a symmetrical pattern . ."  "Um, no it's not . . ." says Jan.  And that's about all she wrote.  Surface, what, are we in a submarine?  Get a clue.  Athletes?  Yeah, I think Kingpin nailed that one.  "Wow, it's kinda intimidating to be in the presence of so many great athletes."  

Ok *DISCLAIMER*  For all you tightwad white people that think I'm being completely serious, stick it.  Just a humorous, sarcasm laden rant about some stuff that everyone already seems to agree on.
--------------------
Forget Kung Fu, I know Ron Bahr!!!

The only difference between youth and adult leagues are that the big boys are allowed to whine.  They're more entertaining anyway.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: card79 on July 08, 2003, 12:26:47 PM
I have to agree with seadrive While every single one of those women are better bowlers than I am why does the broadcast have to be a comercial for women's rights.  It almost feels like I am sitting in on a NCAA meeting about title IX (which I have done before don't do it).  I understand women don't really get their due and and get things as good as men in MANY situations in this world.  I am not trying to say they don't, but don't keep preaching to the choir.  We are watching the show we are supporting them.
--------------------
I don't really play cards and I am not 79, but it fits together somehow.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Bjaardker on July 08, 2003, 12:51:11 PM
Card nailed it. I think every one of us watching can appreciate what these women are doing. Don't preach to the choir.

As I said, I dont mind a few shout outs. I understand why Dede wanted to give her condolences, and the happy anniversary was fine, but until they stop packaging the show like a local high school game, they will never find the support the need to survive.

I recently saw the little league championships on ESPN & IMHO they were more professional & better packaged than the PWBA.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: ClutchClay on July 08, 2003, 12:52:28 PM
quote:
Surface
Entry of Angle (terrible grammar)
Plastic Ball


Should all be on the "only able to say once per telecast" list.


To go slightly off topic for a moment (hey, it's my thread, I can do what I want )...
Don't forget the phrase that Randy Pedersen's (sp?) cohort (whatever his name is) uses at lease once during every PBA show, "Sixty feet to success".  I always know it's coming and it still drives me nuts.  He needs some new material.

Back to CDB/CDL's commentary.  I love it when they say "that was a great shot" when the bowler has just gone beak or fast eight (i.e.: left a 4-7 or 6-10 on a high hit).  Sorry, but if either of those two things happen, it was NOT a great shot.  Sometimes I wonder if the CDs are watching the same show that I am.
--------------------
Regards, ClutchClay
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: mumzie on July 08, 2003, 02:09:12 PM
Title IX???
Has anyone read this months Bowling Digest?
In there, the article about the PWBA blames Title IX for the decrease in entries in PWBA events!!!!!

You gotta read it.

--------------------
Bowling? Of course it's a sport.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: A_P_K on July 08, 2003, 02:34:50 PM
But Ragnar, it wasn't her fault, the lanes were transitioning!!!!
--------------------
Pin_Krusher, formerly Divine Dragon.....a.k.a...The Littleboy with a neutron bomb

Drastically inflicting pin punishing destruction, and doing it with...................well a Drastic!!
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: SrKegler on July 08, 2003, 02:56:17 PM
Jan Schmidt

We used to have a saying in the Army.  Promote people to their highest level of inefficiency.  

I think this is what one of the previous posters, an unnamed PWBA member wanted to say but was too nice.
--------------------
~~~SrK - Have balls, will travel
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: michelle on July 08, 2003, 03:45:52 PM
LOL Sr...more likely a potential fear of fines.  Nobody wants to become the BigAl of the PWBA

'course if there is a demise of a particular women's tour, it would raise the interesting question of "if a fine is levied but nobody is there to collect, did the fine really hapen?"
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: card79 on July 08, 2003, 03:54:32 PM
I would say that it would not really count at that point Michelle.

Mumzie-

I must respectfully disagree with any position that would say that title IX in anyway would reduce women's participation in the women's professional tournaments.  I will be attempting to look up the article you are referring too, but I must say title IX openned the doors to many sports that women would potentially not have continued to persue if they hadn't had title IX.

I better stop now sorry.
--------------------
I don't really play cards and I am not 79, but it fits together somehow.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: mumzie on July 09, 2003, 12:11:23 AM
Card,
I couldn't agree more.
I'm going to start a new topic on this one - it's one of the most absurd things to come out of Rockford in a LONG time...

--------------------
Bowling? Of course it's a sport.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: kev3inp on July 09, 2003, 07:23:38 AM
I think they keep drumming the "athletes" thing in to remind us.  While I'm sure they are, that wouldn't be the first thing that popped into my head if I saw Tiffany or Tenelle walking down the street.  I might think "Gee, what cute little butterballs" but I probably wouldn't be saying "Gee, those girls sure look like athletes."  There are quite a few people I work with that sort of "spoonerize" complex ( ) phrases like "entry of angle" so I hardly even hear it anymore.

"That's nothing but a two bit ring from a crackerback jox."
--------------------
the 3 is silent
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: srlunatic on July 09, 2003, 07:58:51 AM
Your supposed to have the sound on when watching the Telecasts??..;-))

Myself.........volume down.......cd player turned up.........

seems a very enjoyable experience.....;-)).....lol...

Think the telecasts are getting better (remember the PBA has had a couple more decades to perfect there's....).....though I think more bowling information and less "shoutouts" is definately the way to go.....

As for Title IX.........

think the ONLY argument that could be made here is ....since Title IX has opened the doors to female atheletes to compete collegiately in a much more wide variety of sports/athletics then prior to it.........that this has reduced the pool of women who would want to be bowlers.  With more opportunities available, women can make more decisions on what to participate in....unlike in the past where only a handful of sports/athletics were available to them.  So sort of reducing the pool of talent by opening other sports up to women...............but man that is a weak argument at best.....

just me rambling again.....*laugh*...
--------------------
Hotter than Drugz...
Kooler than Jesus...
I am...
srlunatic....
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Bjaardker on July 09, 2003, 08:28:07 AM
quote:
I think they keep drumming the "athletes" thing in to remind us.  While I'm sure they are, that wouldn't be the first thing that popped into my head if I saw Tiffany or Tenelle walking down the street.  I might think "Gee, what cute little butterballs" but I probably wouldn't be saying "Gee, those girls sure look like athletes."


Probably not the first thing you would think when you saw the US women's powerlifting champion either. Most powerlifters are "chunky" at best, yet I think no one would argue against them being athletes.

I guess it's just a matter of don't judge a book by its cover. Then again your "first reaction" also shows how warped our society is when it comes to issues dealing with weight, which is at this point the only "socially acceptable" discrimination. It's not PC to say anything about a person's age, sexual orientation, race, or gender, but it's just fine to ridicule & harass a person about how they're a "fat mother trucker".

But that's a completely different topic. Sorry about the rant.

Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: mumzie on July 09, 2003, 10:53:57 AM
Well, (completely off topic here), as one of the "generously proportioned", I agree. I am extremely healthy, and have an exceptional cardiovascular system (thanks, Daddy).
When I walk into a Drs office, they immediately assume high cholesterol, high blood pressure, etc, just because of my weight. Raises my BP on the spot...
--------------------
Bowling? Of course it's a sport.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: card79 on July 09, 2003, 11:01:00 AM
Don't let it raise your blood pressure Mumzie.  I think it is funny.  People have always looked at me and assumed me to be less than athletic.  I have always been big.  With my previous college football career high school athletics.  Continuing to play softball and golf and bowl and lift weights I love for people to underestimate me any day of the week gives me a mental advantage everytime.

I can show you hundreds of college and nfl linemen that at 300 pounds are more agile have more strength (that is in comparison to size also) and more endurance than people half their size.  They have to it is how they carry all that around and still do what they do.
--------------------
I don't really play cards and I am not 79, but it fits together somehow.
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: kev3inp on July 10, 2003, 06:02:02 AM
I'm sorry if I've offended anybody.  It was NOT my intention to do so.  It IS a problem with societal expectations of what an "athlete" looks like.  Yes, it is possible to be quite overweight and in great shape, but it really is more the exception than the rule.  I know skinny people that are in terrible shape.  300 lb linemen ARE great athletes in pro football.  Of course they're 6'5" too, and work very hard to keep themselves both strong and agile.  Weight lifters, too, do not have the classic "athlete" look, but there is no doubt in my mind that they are.  I'm not disagreeing with any of you, and if you took personal offense or if I've upset you, please accept my abject apology.
--------------------
the 3 is silent
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Bjaardker on July 10, 2003, 08:13:58 AM
quote:
I'm sorry if I've offended anybody.  It was NOT my intention to do so.  It IS a problem with societal expectations of what an "athlete" looks like.  Yes, it is possible to be quite overweight and in great shape, but it really is more the exception than the rule.  I know skinny people that are in terrible shape.  300 lb linemen ARE great athletes in pro football.  Of course they're 6'5" too, and work very hard to keep themselves both strong and agile.  Weight lifters, too, do not have the classic "athlete" look, but there is no doubt in my mind that they are.  I'm not disagreeing with any of you, and if you took personal offense or if I've upset you, please accept my abject apology.


I have to disagree with you on this. With today's fast food lifestyle people are not eating right (lord knows that I dont), however many of those people with a spare tire & change are still physically fit enough to be athletes. Myself I've been 6'1" & 235-250 since junior year of high school. Yet I was very accomplished on both varsity tennis & Ski teams.

My point is, although people aren't eating right they still are getting exercise & performing in sports. Our culture is so focused on high fat & carb foods & getting them quickly, that you will begin to see many more "overweight athletes" in the future.

Edited on 7/10/2003 8:17 AM
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: serice on July 10, 2003, 10:34:52 AM
I'm in the same place as Mumzie -- I carry the extra weight, but I can out play most people in my age group (or younger) in tennis and softball.  I have low BP, low cholesteral, great heart rate, high HDLs (the good cholesteral)and a strong skeletal/muscle system -- comes from years of walking 4-5 miles a day.

Sure, would I like to look trim, yeah, but I am really healthy and I am an ATHLETE!  
Title: Re: Entry of Angle?!?
Post by: Phillip Marlowe on July 10, 2003, 12:28:52 PM
Back to the topic and away from athlete....They have to get folks who can teach on the broadcast and reduce the undefined phrases, unexplained concepts, introduced but not defined changes in oil and conditions, stop making obvious errors (they are missing their 10 pins because of too much oil  -- excuse me, so they can't thrown the ball straight -- that the sport pattern is wet-dry inside and out, that "surface" is important when what they mean is less polish or porousity, that ....    GRRRRRRRR.
--------------------

"It's just a carry contest."