LANE CONDITION
Type (THS, Sport Pattern etc): THS
COMMENTS
Right handed
57 years old
Rev Rate: 320
Ball speed: 15 to 15 1/2 mph
Today, I drilled up the newest release from Roto Grip in the HP3 performance line, The Rubicon. Thanks to Steve Green of Green' Pro Shop for drilling it up. He has been very good with drilling equipment for myself and my daughter for several years now. If you live in southeastern PA, please consider making him your ball driller.
I used a 5"x4"x3" layout, hoping to enhance the ball's natural characteristics. I chose to leave it at the box finish of 3000 abralon since my rev rate has declined precipitously as I've gotten older, down to around 320rpm now. Bowling was done on a typical, StoneStreet type house shot. For comparison, I also threw a UFO and a SuperSonic, both with similar layouts and box surfaces. It seems that RotoSchlem was spot on with his intent and finished product.
The first two things I noticed were: 1) holy flare, Batman! It flares a lot and 2) It rolls like a ball that has a P4 hole in it. No kidding. Staying around the oil line, it was clean for a dull solid through the front. No need to jump into the puddle. Nice midlane read without being too quick a response while showing a strong downlane continuous motion and going through the pins well. Whether I went with a weaker wrist and going more up the back of the ball or firming up and getting around it more, The Rubicon exhibited the same type shape and ball motion, just more or less hook. The best word to describe it is "blendy". Compared to the UFO, it was not as early and more continuous on the backend. The UFO is clearly earlier and more inclined to burn up with just a little bit of friction. A 2 & 2 move left allowed it to store more energy and hit much harder but you can clearly see the difference in ball strength due to the coverstocks (Nano based vs. pure solid).
Next, I compared it with the SuperSonic, since that ball is a lower RG, quick-revving piece. The nano-based, hybrid cover enhances the early revving nature of the ball so I thoght it would be and interesting comparison. The Rubicon had a noticeably slower response and was more forgivng if I got it right early. The SuperSonic was much more likely to over/under for me, also. It did cover more boards, however.
Initial impressions of the Rubicon are very impressive. I believe it will be a versatile ball, showing success on both Sport shots and House shots, due to its blendy, more continuous shape. While making comparisons is a very subjective thing, I believe bowlers will see a lot of the Code X or Alpha Crux in the Rubicon. Make sure to get yours at your local Storm VIP Pro Shop.