win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL  (Read 7278 times)

Ric Clint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« on: October 15, 2008, 01:38:46 AM »
Logged

 

ccrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2008, 11:38:57 AM »
Jugg,

One of my few, brief moments of clarity.

I wonder how the Cell Pearl compares to the Gravity Shift.  My guess is that they roll similar. I can not imagine the Cell Pearl having more backend.  

I can use my Gravity Shift for all three games during our 5 men league, on a modified THS, with more oil outside of 5 then normal you can miss right. Just have to be careful to stay firm because of over an under on fresh shot like most pearls I have thrown. Is the Cell Pearl about the same?
--------------------
Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.

Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.
Logged

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #32 on: October 21, 2008, 11:52:27 AM »
Nope dont roll the same in box finish, I have both but let me tell you the Cell pearl at 2k is a flipping outstanding ball. I went with the CP game 1 and right to the AZO Pure Tactics games 2 and 3.

Gravity shift is different than the CP, not huge differences enough to warrant having each ball. I dulled my CP to 2k no polish, now it picks up and handles oil like a champ before it was somewhat allergic to oil.





quote:
Jugg,

One of my few, brief moments of clarity.

I wonder how the Cell Pearl compares to the Gravity Shift.  My guess is that they roll similar. I can not imagine the Cell Pearl having more backend.  

I can use my Gravity Shift for all three games during our 5 men league, on a modified THS, with more oil outside of 5 then normal you can miss right. Just have to be careful to stay firm because of over an under on fresh shot like most pearls I have thrown. Is the Cell Pearl about the same?
--------------------
Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.

Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.
Logged

strikealot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1485
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2008, 12:09:16 PM »
i have 2 cell pearls also...one is 5x3 with pin up, it handles oil nicely....i have the other at 6x5 pin up at 2000 with beans on it and it is my fav, i kill my house with this ball playing deep inside...they compliment each other very well for me...i ave 233 this past weekend in a doubles tourney with the 5x3 CP on wood lanes...love them both and would highly recommend this ball for anyone..
--------------------

~<:-0======"IN CG WE TRUST" i chant as i pray to the static weight God...======



Logged
~<:-0======"IN CG WE TRUST" i chant as i pray to the static weight God...======

wkf0908

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2008, 04:46:25 AM »
No Big Deal!!

Just when ROTO-GRIP make a ball is suitable for 990 bowlers & 10 isn't!!
Logged

crankncrash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 967
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #35 on: November 14, 2008, 10:31:04 PM »
To me, I think roto would have been better served releasing a hybrid cell at 4000 grit letting it push down the lane have more bite in the backs and avoided the pearl thing all together, but thats just me.  I would take the pearl if you gave it to me, but I'd take the original at 4000 first and make it compliment my OOB cell, smoooooooooth strong, predictable, what else do you want?
Logged

jls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18398
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #36 on: November 25, 2008, 11:57:13 AM »
quote:

Not from me... it's from daveozio

Thoughts?


http://www.ballreviews.com/Reviews/Reviews.asp?BallID=916&ManufacterID=15&ReviewID=30065




Just one thought on the Cell Pearl.

IT IS SELLING WELL!!!!!!   >>>>  in our area, the midwest!!!

enough said
--------------------
jls

Edited on 11/25/2008 1:04 PM
Logged

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #37 on: November 25, 2008, 12:00:53 PM »
Not on the west coast...
--------------------
Formerly BrunsRico
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

jls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18398
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #38 on: November 25, 2008, 12:04:09 PM »
quote:
Not on the west coast...
--------------------
Formerly BrunsRico



Wow,  really,  it's not doing well out west?  Here in the midwest, the ball has been a huge hit.

go figure
--------------------
jls
Logged

Rileybowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3458
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #39 on: November 25, 2008, 12:20:18 PM »
quote:
quote:
Not on the west coast...
--------------------
Formerly BrunsRico



Wow,  really,  it's not doing well out west?  Here in the midwest, the ball has been a huge hit.

go figure
--------------------
jls

_________________________________________________________
JLS I guess them guys can't get out of Starbucks long enough to buy one and try it out
--------------------
Carl
Bless the LORD o my soul and all that is within me bless his holy name
Logged
Carl
Bless the LORD o my soul and all that is within me bless his holy name

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #40 on: November 25, 2008, 12:29:54 PM »
Starbucks...funny.

Most of the shops out here, in Starbucks land, are not seeing the response from the pearl that there was for the solid. It is also a little allergic to oil. There are other pearls that out perform it also.

Glad you are selling them, we can send ours to you.
--------------------
Formerly BrunsRico
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

SKIDSNAP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 638
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #41 on: November 25, 2008, 12:40:02 PM »
There isn't a pearl on the market that handles oil and carrydown better than the Cell Pearl.  How about you drilling one and seeing what it can do?

Logged

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #42 on: November 25, 2008, 12:42:15 PM »
I do not need to drill a ball to see what it does. Thanks for offering though.
--------------------
Formerly BrunsRico
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

mmcfarland300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #43 on: November 25, 2008, 02:24:58 PM »
I have seen 2 Cell Pearls the Kansas City area, 1 being thrown by a lefty and the other in a Pro Shop.
Logged

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #44 on: November 25, 2008, 03:01:55 PM »
Selling in Vegas, i have seen 6 on ball returns in the last two weeks alone. Yes it is allergic to oil and carrydown in box also, not the worst I have seen but still a great ball.

Edited on 11/25/2008 4:04 PM
Logged

tdub36tjt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: 1st Negative Review of CELL PEARL
« Reply #45 on: November 25, 2008, 03:10:44 PM »
While I like mine, to say it handles oil better than any other pearl is not true from what I see. To me it is just the Total NV all over again. Nice length decent backend good carry. But I have thrown a lot of stronger pearls.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
« previous next »