BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Roto Grip => Topic started by: Loki300 on July 29, 2005, 10:55:35 PM

Title: Mercury
Post by: Loki300 on July 29, 2005, 10:55:35 PM

Just wondering how the Mercury matches up with the Ultra Sonic considering they both have the same coverstocks. My guess is the mercury has more midlane and is a lot smoother, but wasn't that what the Super sonics for.

I just don't know how the new cores reacts compared to the X-1 core of the sonics. Is it more read and harder hitting??

Title: Re: Mercury
Post by: Re-Evolution on July 30, 2005, 10:31:11 AM

The Mercury was designed to be the Sonic Boom replacement. It should have a bit more length and be a bit smoother than the Ulra all other factors being equal.
--------------------
STORM TRACK
 

www.Bowling-Info.com (http://"www.Bowling-Info.com/index.php")

BR.com's unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")

Title: Re: Mercury
Post by: Admiral50 on August 04, 2005, 07:04:17 AM

For me the Mercury reads the midlane much quicker than the sonic line and is very smooth on the backend.  Compared to my Boom you can line up in the same spot but you will get a different look to each ball.  The boom goes a few feet longer and snaps harder on the backend.  It isn't very close in my eyes to the Ultra Sonic.  For me the Ultra Sonic went forever.  It depends what you are looking for, I think the mercury will be best played going up the boards when there is a decent amount of head oil and some good backends.

thank you,
Justin Godfrey