win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Replacement for cell pearl  (Read 1399 times)

Norros

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Replacement for cell pearl
« on: February 08, 2010, 02:38:40 AM »
Ball arsenal:sure fire, sidewinder, csystem 2.5, mars, cell pearl, Invasion and the natural.

Ive had the cell pearl since Jan 2009. I love this ball but it has too much tournament and games on it and also a crack from ring figner up about 1 inch.

What im searching for is a replacement for the ball. About the same reaction, i just whant to try something new. The layout was pin above finger and cg 1 inch right to center grip line.

Im a cranker with lots rev and speed. I have the nomad pearl and the fast in mind. Can somebody give me advices?

Im searching something for my house shot witch is Kegel Pheonix 43foot.

By the way ive always had a favorite with rotogrip and storm.

Heres a video of me is you whant to evaluate
http://www.youtube.com/user/Norros23

Tank you very much for comments!
Logged

 

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: Replacement for cell pearl
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2010, 11:14:17 AM »
Nomad pearl and Fast won't be as strong. A Virtual Energy would likely be a closer match. The Reign wouldn't be too far off either.
Logged

Norros

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Replacement for cell pearl
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2010, 11:20:38 AM »
as you seen in tried the virtual energy from my video. I didnt specifie i whanted something to play more outside and a bit less kick.

sorry bout that but yea, the reign sounds pretty great. i wonder if its gonna kick harder than the cell pearl though. I know for a fact that the riegn is a beast. I just never compared both...


But yea i will concider the Reign.

Tanx
Logged

MC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1300
Re: Replacement for cell pearl
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2010, 12:02:34 PM »
I think they would be fairly compairable. Maybe a little more natural length in the Reign.
--------------------
"Don't Give Up...  Don't Ever Give Up."       -Jim Valvano

"Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."         -Vince Lombardi

VISIONARY TEST STAFF 07/08

Tag Team Coaching success story
             www.visionarybowling.com

Logged

ralphiejantz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: Replacement for cell pearl
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2010, 12:05:26 PM »
Nomad Pearl is much stronger than the Fast but both are weaker than the cell pearl

if you want to replace your cell pearl buy another one while they are still making them

Logged

Rotoguy300

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: Replacement for cell pearl
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2010, 02:31:09 PM »
Actually, the Nomad Pearl was stronger than the Cell Pearl for me personally and I match up pretty similar to you in revs/ball speed (Im slower with both, but they match up in a similar manner). I personally would tell you to get another Cell Pearl, but if you had to try something new, get a Nomad Pearl and drill it to roll up earlier and use an extra hole low to increase the diff a touch and they''ll be comparable, with slightly more length from the Nomad Pearl.

You don''t throw the ball bad.

Hope that helps/keep supporting Roto Grip!

Edit- That being said, if you wanted to try another brand, the AZO Area matches up reasonably well to a Cell Pearl with a little more pop and the Columbia Bedlam and Track 715A arent bad either....

Edited on 2/8/2010 3:32 PM
Logged

bighook69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Re: Replacement for cell pearl
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2010, 02:57:47 PM »
quote:
Nomad Pearl is much stronger than the Fast but both are weaker than the cell pearl

if you want to replace your cell pearl buy another one while they are still making them



this
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »