BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Roto Grip => Topic started by: Zanatos1914 on June 06, 2012, 05:41:06 PM

Title: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: Zanatos1914 on June 06, 2012, 05:41:06 PM
If you had to compare both balls what words would you use?  I have both now but havent used the Rogue and my Gen 1 Cell is really used for straighter and tighter shots for me..  It doesnt move that many board either because of my ball speed or it might have 2 much oil.... 

Just trying to get the charactor of this ball...

How about compare it with the Storm Invasion vs Rogue Cell...

Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: Rightycomplex on June 06, 2012, 05:52:39 PM
The original cell was a beast of a ball. Strong but gave the avg bowler length and versatility. The rogue cell is a bit smoother on the back and earlier up front. The invasion is stronger than both. More midlane read, starting up sooner, and more over all hook. Hope that helps.
Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: Zanatos1914 on June 06, 2012, 06:00:21 PM
Thanks that is a start ---  I have the Invasion but its drilled long and this Rogue is drilled like a cranker - Sorry for not being able to give the pap and etc like most but but this Rogue is drilled like the Video clips for a cranker... 

Also changed the cover to 800 with Light polish...

I think i need a few games on this ball before this weekend
Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: ImBackInTheGame on June 06, 2012, 06:45:23 PM
I thought that the Rouge was in between the Cell and the Pearl.  Rouge with a touch more length than the original with more backend.
Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: Zanatos1914 on June 07, 2012, 10:04:57 AM
After a few games it appears the Rogue is weaker than the cell and much weaker than invasion..  Also the ball is bery angler... Its responds like a my cuda c strangle enough
Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: iowalefty on July 16, 2012, 12:15:25 PM
I had the original Cell, and have the Rogue Cell and Cell Pearl.  The original Cell was a monster for me from about 30 ft to the headpin, had no quit.  By comparison, the RC starts a bit later (pearl part of coverstock) and has a quick angular move..overall pretty close to the original Cell. IMO, as far as midlane, Cell>RC>CP.  As far as pure backend, RC>CP>Cell.  All three are beasts in their own right.
Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: tommyboy74 on July 16, 2012, 04:13:57 PM
The Rogue is a little earlier but still has a ton of backend and is more angular.  It's a great ball, hands down.  I love throwing mine.
Title: Re: Rogue Cell vs Generation 1 Cell
Post by: Locke on August 03, 2012, 11:31:22 AM
My Rogue was about 3-5 boards more overall compared to the Cell. That was pretty much all in the backend for me. They had similar drillings and about the same length. It was all about the snap of the rogue. They were very different for me.