win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Theory, same cover as Invasion?  (Read 5745 times)

tywithay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Theory, same cover as Invasion?
« on: December 27, 2010, 05:55:35 PM »
Has a similar cover scheme and similar look, poured in the same plant, any chance they're the same? Haven't had a chance to drill my Theory yet and I'm just kind of wondering what to expect. I really liked my Invasion when I had a chance to throw it. Trying to figure out if these two balls will be pretty similar. Low Rg, strong solid cover...seem somewhat alike.
Logged

 

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: Theory, same cover as Invasion?
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2011, 09:21:50 PM »
To the OP.....the Marvel has the exact same cover as the VG....it's OOB at 2000 and the ball is a beast. The Theory is a good ball, and very strong in its own way, but I agree with the other posters, the cover seems to need a good amount of attention. Every 9 games I hit it with 1000 than 2000 and it springs back to just like new. I don't have to give the Invasion cover quite that much attention....
 
Edited by golfnutFL on 1/24/2011 at 10:23 PM
Logged

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: Theory, same cover as Invasion?
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2011, 09:03:54 AM »
Theory and Invasion have totally different looks rolling for me.  Theory is more like the original cell, but the lower rg core is noticeable for me.  My cell tamed down quickly too, but so far the Theory is not getting the lane shine that many balls do.  Of course lane shine is not all bad.  My Virtual Gravity performed much better for me after it shined up and was still strong.  I never did anything to the surface and it was great for well over 100 games.


Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »