win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Illusion vs. Track Equation  (Read 1285 times)

Trackoholic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
Illusion vs. Track Equation
« on: November 19, 2007, 07:16:54 AM »
Can anyone who has thrown both of these give a comparison on length and backend?
--------------------
Inertia-Black Widow-Machine-Power Machine-Mystic-Desert Heat-Neptune-Plastic

 

The Bowlers Edge 2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2007, 07:35:15 PM »
equation has just a touch more length, illusion starts up a bit sooner, they are about the same off the spot (very strong) and both continue well on the backend.
--------------------
The Bowler's Edge Pro Shop

vanni9283

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2007, 11:42:44 PM »
Illusion will probably be a little-bit stronger than the Equation.

Edited on 11/20/2007 8:31 AM

mttmar1975

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2007, 03:47:56 PM »
The Illusion gets more 300's and 800's.  Just some info...The ball has been released since November 8th and we have already seen 8 300's and 2 800's and numerous high 700's.  and that is in 12 days!!!  The ball hits like a truck and keeps the pins low!
--------------------
Matt Martin
Roto Grip Inc.
Marketing Manager

LaneHammer20

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2007, 04:39:25 PM »
From what I have heard, the Equation is not a pearl reactive, i may be wrong. If it is I can't see it getting mor length than the pearl Illusion. I have been really aiming at an Illusion, but I need a ball wqith length with a strong move, and if you say it is rather early for a pearl I should look elsewhere
--------------------
I thought my Hammers hit hard, until I whipped a LM/L ball into the pocket. WOW!

Arsenal:
-Terminator
-Big Bang
-Buzz
-Black Widow
-Hawgzilla
-Spare Tire