win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid  (Read 885 times)

spartanplayaAA

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid
« on: November 30, 2006, 06:57:14 AM »
how do these two compare, thinking of getting both of them along with a fired up to complete the lower end of my arsenal. if i were to get these three, my arsenal would look as follows:

fired up
spitfire
thunderstruck solid
vapor zone
scorchin inferno

i know the fired up will tend to go longer and flip harder than the spitfire, but how about the spitfire compared to the t-struck solid. thanks

dave
Logged

 

bowlingmaniac017

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
Re: spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2006, 03:03:41 PM »
From what I have seen and thrown... The Spit Fire is very rolly and the Thunderstruck Solid is extremely smooth in the midlanes with a controlled backend.

I think it was Jeff Carter that said this:

"Thunderstruck Solid rolls thru the midlane like a solid but has the backend of a pearl"
--------------------
Mike
Logged
Mike

Fluff E Bunnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
Re: spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2006, 06:45:49 AM »
I'll agree with that.  The T-Struck is very smooth rolling but it has a big continuous backend.  I find it to be quite the perfect all-around ball.

The Spit Fire I haven't used though...  I know Storm has a video of it on their site.

--------------------
My Bowling Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8Tm5tQltTQ&NR
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »