win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Natural no longe in production?  (Read 9907 times)

Miffy1980

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Natural no longe in production?
« on: May 27, 2010, 02:05:16 PM »
Is that true?

 

surface_solutions

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2010, 04:03:59 PM »
Who cares, this ball was a flop for the most part.  It had good reaction but pin carry suffered.  

If you want a good urethane ball with GREAT reaction and superb pin carry get yourself an AMF Hype Urethane!  It is hands down one of the best balls that I have ever thrown.  

I tried to stick with AMF/Global for about 2 years and had nothing to show for it, I have since gone to Storm/Roto and made a huge turn around since X-mas so they are my guys.  I just can't say enough about that one ball.

Not to mention the core is kind of similar to the old SD-73....
--------------------
(616) 690-0590
surface_solutions_proshop@yahoo.com
{Be sure to inlcude _ if sending e-mails or payment to paypal}
Link to arsenal:


Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2010, 04:45:45 PM »
Anythings possible, but if it is, rotogrip is just now starting to make the new grenade, so storm/roto fans will still have that option.
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile

Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

kleze

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2010, 04:52:00 PM »
urethane with the sd-73 core is the ROTOGRIP - MTX urethane type


boysofsummer23

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2010, 05:06:39 PM »
wow the Natural is a great ball if you know how to throw it for I have done very well with it. Six in state in doubles and also a 298 with it and a 748 series. I'm sorry but not every ball is going to match up with everyone who trys to throw it.

themachine300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2010, 08:29:37 PM »
natural is a nasty ball for when the time is right to use it
--------------------
www.bowlingsolutions.com

Bowl to win!!!

Move left, hook it more.....

Tommy Jones and Kenny Simard are Gamecock fans...are you???
Philipp Hudak
Ebonite Amateur Staff
Bowl To Win!
#TeamEBI

Doug Sterner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4395
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2010, 11:46:51 PM »
I agree with the last 2 posters.....the Natural is the kind of ball that will tell you within 2 shots if it's the right time to use the ball.

When the conditions are right the ball is devastating. If you are trying to force the ball to work on a condition that is less than ideal the ball will look bad.
--------------------
Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

http://dougsproshop@aol.com
www.dougsproshop.net
Lane 1 Buzzsaw...The Official Power Tool Of Bowling

For Real Time Interactive Bowling Conversation:
BowlingChat.net

Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

Proud Member of the NRA
Fighting to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.

DanH78

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3913
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2010, 01:01:15 AM »
quote:
Is that true?


Who did you hear this from?
--------------------
It IS next year!
#10

lsf_21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2010, 01:01:38 AM »
Natural is the best ball in my bag. This whole year ive only throw 3 balls and when the lanes are dry  ive shot my best sets with this ball, including my highest series of all time.
--------------------
GO CUBS!!!!
GO CELTICS!!!!

BrunsMike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2785
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2010, 02:20:28 AM »
The Natural is far from being a Flop of a ball, you want a flop of a ball look at the Radical Inferno.....

I use my natural A LOT! The last 3 months of leauge I used that ball exclusivly. Shot 630+ every night with it playing up 10 board most of the night. Maybe move a board or 2 by the end of the night to retain pin carry.

If the ball is being discontinued then that will be storms worst decision in a while.

The AMF Hype is not a true urethane because it has solid mixed into the coverstock which causes that "urethane" to hook more then the natural. The Natural uses no pearl or solid additives hance the name "NATURAL"!
--------------------
Mike Zadler
"When in doubt, Pull out" - Rob Stone
Below, my stats from previous seasons:
http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=552&suffix=12886
Mike Zadler

clt2244

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2010, 05:22:18 AM »
I always heard that the AMF Hype Urethane has the same cover from the AMF Angles and to my knowledge that was pure urethane, but it wouldnt be the first time I herd something that was wrong.
--------------------
Only throw the good stuff, Roto/Global.
BowlingChat.net
RIP Sawbones
#900Global #ihate9pins

Bag:
DTC Pearl
Dream On
Inception Pearl x2 (Pin Up and Down)
Covert Ops
Honey Badger
Truth Pearl
Truth Solid
Booyah

Others:
Dream
Respect
Sure Thing
Black Boost
Hybrid Boost
Black Ops
Special Ops

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2010, 06:16:21 AM »
It may be a great ball, but that doesn't mean great sales numbers. Tour players loving it also doesn't equal great sales.

Most don't bowl on those conditions. Most of the tour players that were using it with success were those with higher rev rates. I saw a few local average bowlers throwing this ball and had little to no real success. They didn't have the higher rev rate and the ball was just a bit too much on the weak side for them.

It may be a flop in overall sales but that doesn't mean the ball its self is the problem. It just falls into a nitch market for many. We will see over the next year or two with other companies releasing similar products if the overall concept of bringing back urethane will continue.
--------------------
" men lie, women lie, numbers don't "
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

n00dlejester

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
  • The Dude Abides
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2010, 07:59:50 AM »
quote:
It may be a great ball, but that doesn't mean great sales numbers. Tour players loving it also doesn't equal great sales.

Most don't bowl on those conditions. Most of the tour players that were using it with success were those with higher rev rates. I saw a few local average bowlers throwing this ball and had little to no real success. They didn't have the higher rev rate and the ball was just a bit too much on the weak side for them.

It may be a flop in overall sales but that doesn't mean the ball its self is the problem. It just falls into a nitch market for many. We will see over the next year or two with other companies releasing similar products if the overall concept of bringing back urethane will continue.
--------------------
" men lie, women lie, numbers don't "


Yeah yeah.  What he said.
--------------------
Proud Supporter of Rob Stone
Obviously, you aren't a golfer.
Some stayed in the foothills, some washed logs like teeth.
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."

qstick777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5188
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2010, 10:14:03 AM »
quote:
The Natural is far from being a Flop of a ball, you want a flop of a ball look at the Radical Inferno.....

I use my natural A LOT! The last 3 months of leauge I used that ball exclusivly. Shot 630+ every night with it playing up 10 board most of the night. Maybe move a board or 2 by the end of the night to retain pin carry.

If the ball is being discontinued then that will be storms worst decision in a while.

The AMF Hype is not a true urethane because it has solid mixed into the coverstock which causes that "urethane" to hook more then the natural. The Natural uses no pearl or solid additives hance the name "NATURAL"!
--------------------
Mike Zadler
"When in doubt, Pull out" - Rob Stone
Below, my stats from previous seasons:
http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=552&suffix=12886




Wow, it's amazing what you read around here.

http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=244112&ForumID=1&CategoryID=2

 
quote:
There has been some speculation as to the authenticity of todays "Urethane" balls. For instance, a rep here in my area said that the Natural by Storm, marketed urethane, is actually a blended cover combining reactive parts with urethane parts.  



And from a response later in the thread:

Quote

From the Black Angle info sheet it is a blended urethane F-20, the AMF site states the Hype only as F-20 urethane, if I'm not mistaken a conversation a short time back with Eric I believed he said it was the same cover as on the Black Angle, the difference being the Hype has a strong core pushing the tires.


So many people saying so many things, how do we know the truth?


Urethane, blended, solid additives, pearl additives, slip agents, etc.  Does it really matter?  If the ball works I don't really care what the coverstock is!


r534me

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 936
Re: Natural no longe in production?
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2010, 07:10:48 PM »
And what's the answer?  In production still?