win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Mars vs. Fast  (Read 980 times)

justinmill14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
Mars vs. Fast
« on: November 25, 2009, 11:08:08 AM »
What are the differences between the Roto Grip mars and the storm fast? Which one is better for dry lanes, which one is stronger, and how do each compare in reaction?

 

Hightracker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
Re: Mars vs. Fast
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2009, 08:33:37 PM »
well I belive the fast is a more agressive ball. The fast is 0.038 diff while the Mars is 0.022 I belive.. Also take into cosideration the mars cover is weaker, even tho a solid/pearl hybrid. I have seen the fast in action, much more hook then expected for me, I personally had the street rod, i belive the core is to strong IMO, at least for my game.... With this being said I would slect the mars, its going to be much more predictable. Ask your driller.. he knows best

LotsaBalls

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Mars vs. Fast
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2009, 01:35:36 AM »
The fast is very strong, definitely not a dry lanes ball.

greenefam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 852
Re: Mars vs. Fast
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2009, 09:49:40 AM »
The cover on the Mars is more like the old Storm Curelyon that was on the original Hot Rod.  The Mars will get through drier heads much cleaner than a Fast.  The Fast is a stronger ball with more angle at the breakpoint.

I'd go with a Mars for drier lanes and a Fast for medium-dry when you want to generate angle.

No Revs00300

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 484
Re: Mars vs. Fast
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2009, 10:15:05 AM »
Mars would be the ball I would choose for light to medium light. Effortless Length with a nice controlled backend. Great carry as well. Good luck.