BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Storm => Topic started by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 01:28:38 AM

Title: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 01:28:38 AM
I can't say enough good things about Storm products, but I do have one complaint and was wondering if anyone else feels this way...

Does anyone else think Storm needs to release a ball with a WEAKER coverstock?  I find my Tropicals and Street Rods are to strong for light oil.  I'm considering a Neptune for just those reasons.  But just wondering anyone elses opinion.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Jesse James on January 29, 2009, 09:37:22 AM
I think that is why Storm/Roto-Grip are related. For the niche balls you are looking for, you have to go to Roto Grip!

The Neptune is a very versatile and tweakable ball for various lighter oil conditions. I am also extremely fond of all the Sonic series balls which were perfect for various lite oil and dry conditons.

I still have two Sonic X's that save me on a regular basis in league. When everybody's Vibes are still leaving corners, I am carrying the world.

But.....back to your initial question posted,.....yeah...a little weaker cover for a Storm ball is needed. I thought they hit the mark with their Big Hit pearls, back in the day. Those balls were money!!!
--------------------
Duct tape is like 'The Force'. It has a light side and a dark side, but it still holds the universe together.

Some days you're the bug some days you're the windshield.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: abrown on January 29, 2009, 09:42:04 AM
you can also look for some of the true dry lane balls that storm did make they didn't sale that good so they didn't last lik the hit and big hit you can still find a couple of them on a web site
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: los2003 on January 29, 2009, 09:42:57 AM
neptune is too strong also if the tropical is... it's very snappy
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: los2003 on January 29, 2009, 09:44:15 AM
I still have a sonic x that may be closer to what you ae looking for.. but if you have a decent rev rate the neptune will look like it was kicked left  off of the dry
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: abrown on January 29, 2009, 09:45:04 AM
try a negative layout on one that will give you more length and control the reation better
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 09:46:07 AM
My rev rate is med-high, 15mph speed, high track (pap is 5 3/8 3/8 up).  So any help on the dry is needed! I have been strugling all season and cannot figure out ANYTHING on dry lanes.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: abrown on January 29, 2009, 09:46:57 AM
go to bowling ball mall .com they still have the hit and big hit
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 09:47:01 AM
quote:
try a negative layout on one that will give you more length and control the reation better


Been done on a Tropical and a Rapid Fire Pearl.  Tropical is to over/under, RFP is a little to strong.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: abrown on January 29, 2009, 09:51:27 AM
try the layout i just sent ya
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Mr Straight Ball on January 29, 2009, 12:39:38 PM
Companies are not using their resources to make balls that don't perform. Over the years, Storm has released some weaker pieces but I am pretty sure the bottom line ($$$) says it's not worth it long term.

I would not just say do a negative layout as so many forget that so called negative drillings cause the ball to roll early. Your driller just needs to put you in a layout matched for your game. Personally, I have a Street Rod Solid, Razor Wire and yes a Dimension that are only good when there is friction. If I have to use my Big Hit, it's a bad day!!! Not because I don't like the ball but because there is no oil to be found if it's working.
--------------------
Baker...Why doesn't my ball hk?
40 Boards & A Ball - www.40boards.com
Is your Ball ready to cross 40 Boards?

40 Boards is proudly supported by Storm Products & Stepp's Glen Burnie Pro Shop
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: themagician on January 29, 2009, 01:04:17 PM
My Tropical works well on dry lanes, if it moves to much I find plastic is the only option.
--------------------

http://www.absolutebowling.com
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 01:12:52 PM
As far as negative equipment, yes I do know they roll earlier.  That being said, I have trouble getting a ball to store energy through burnt heads and still hitting harder than a wet marshmallow. Sometimes, I wish I was bowling with a wet marshmallow, cause I feel they would hit better.  But seriously, the dry lane thing is KILLING ME!  

As far as my ball driller, that would be me.  And I have a tendency to be able to match anyone up to a ball/layout option but when it comes to myself, forget about it.  Sorry to turn this into a rant, its just painful to watch people get the ball down the lane, and my ball checking up at the arrows.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Dan Belcher on January 29, 2009, 01:15:27 PM
If the lanes are that dry, you're wasting your time throwing almost anything reactive resin.  Plastic is probably your best friend on lanes like that.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: LowRG on January 29, 2009, 01:16:47 PM
The Tour Block series that is overseas would fit nicely.  Solid and Pearl urethane. I am not sure as to how to get them here, but they exist.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 01:22:23 PM
Dan,

To be honest, I shot 260 three weeks ago with my plastic ball, and I actually had bowlers disrespect me.  My teamates were giving high fives, and the other team actually said, "Strikes with plastic don't deserve praise."  I have no problem throwing plastic, just its not something that I feel I really should have to do.  But hey, if thats what I have to do, I'll do it.  Wish Storm would come out with a plastic ball with a core.  Clear cover, T-Road core.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: dolbydigital on January 29, 2009, 01:30:53 PM
quote:
Dan,

To be honest, I shot 260 three weeks ago with my plastic ball, and I actually had bowlers disrespect me.  My teamates were giving high fives, and the other team actually said, "Strikes with plastic don't deserve praise."  I have no problem throwing plastic, just its not something that I feel I really should have to do.  But hey, if thats what I have to do, I'll do it.  Wish Storm would come out with a plastic ball with a core.  Clear cover, T-Road core.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"


well,if plastics strikes dun deserve praise,than wat do?
c'mon they are just being sour grapes,anybody can hit strikes with plastics must have certain amount of skills in order to do it

way to go man
--------------------
my current arsenal....
secret agent
power agent (int'l)
shift
attitude shift
gravity shift
surefire
spitfire
tropical storm
jolt solid
storm spare x 2
thunderstruck pearl
street rod solid
street rod pearl
dimension
perfect dimension (int'l)
rapid fire pearl
fired up II
phase (int'l)
hot shot

BOWL UP A STORM
www.bandofbowlers.sg
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: jbruno6 on January 29, 2009, 01:55:27 PM
quote:
My rev rate is med-high, 15mph speed, high track (pap is 5 3/8 3/8 up).  So any help on the dry is needed! I have been strugling all season and cannot figure out ANYTHING on dry lanes.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"



We pretty much have the same PAP, speed, revs.  I tried alot also, but I have found an answer so far:  A Hammer Razyr, taken down to 1000, with a light polish.
--------------------
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: SVstar34 on January 29, 2009, 02:07:21 PM
quote:
Dan,

To be honest, I shot 260 three weeks ago with my plastic ball, and I actually had bowlers disrespect me.  My teamates were giving high fives, and the other team actually said, "Strikes with plastic don't deserve praise."  I have no problem throwing plastic, just its not something that I feel I really should have to do.  But hey, if thats what I have to do, I'll do it.  Wish Storm would come out with a plastic ball with a core.  Clear cover, T-Road core.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"


Why should you not have to throw plastic? If plastic is working, throw plastic...
--------------------
My Arsenal:
Bounty(4.5 x 4.75 Fresh 1000 Abralon)
Twisted Fury(5 x 4 500 Abralon + Reacta Shine)
Raw Hammer Pain(Leverage 1000 Abralon)
Blue Vibe(5 x 5 4000 Abralon + Reacta Shine)

Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 29, 2009, 02:07:37 PM
What about those silly "Trick Layouts" Tommy Jones used to use taking a long pin (4-5) and placing it real high:
--P--
-----
-0-0-
--c--
--O--
Anyone try this before?  Just wondering.  Like I said, dry lanes are my biggest enemy
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Dan Belcher on January 29, 2009, 02:14:18 PM
quote:
Dan,

To be honest, I shot 260 three weeks ago with my plastic ball, and I actually had bowlers disrespect me.  My teamates were giving high fives, and the other team actually said, "Strikes with plastic don't deserve praise."
Just how flipping stupid (or jealous) are the other bowlers?  You have to execute just as well, if not better, to score with a plastic ball.  But you can still do it, and isn't the name of the game to knock down pins no matter how you do it?
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Dan Belcher on January 29, 2009, 02:15:13 PM
quote:
What about those silly "Trick Layouts" Tommy Jones used to use taking a long pin (4-5) and placing it real high:
--P--
-----
-0-0-
--c--
--O--
Anyone try this before?  Just wondering.  Like I said, dry lanes are my biggest enemy
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
I had a buddy try this in a house that was scorched once.  It didn't get the ball down the lane well enough, he still had to resort to throwing his plastic ball.  The ball revved up very, very hard once it found  enough friction.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: themagician on January 29, 2009, 02:17:36 PM
My Tropical could be considered a "trick" layout, it is 6.5" from my axis, I haven't measured the pin to val or angle on it since I remeasured since my track raised for the pin to pap. The ball doesn't flare but maybe 1/2" and it does that very quickly and then just makes a very deliberate turn when it hits friction. It is pretty mild but if its hooking a lot I just use plastic, best option IMO.
--------------------

http://www.absolutebowling.com
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: HAMMERDOWN103 on January 29, 2009, 04:39:54 PM
Just a note on the TJ trick layout. You place the pin like 4.5" from your axis but use a long pin to place it high above the fingers in order to get the ball downlane. It isn't like a 6" pin to pap or anything like that. I tried it and the ball is an absolute monster on the right condition. Have you considered a pin on axis ball? Only other thing i can think of suggesting.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: dursty on January 30, 2009, 08:53:47 PM
I've heard that Storm has some weaker coverstocks available and a core that would match up with it but I think the problem is that for Storm it's going to be a little tricky to market that type of ball as everybody wants more hook today.  The situation is a little like the particle balls you really don't see very much of anymore because of the high maintenance they required and shorter lifespan.  Hopefully storm will move forward and release a good light/dry lane ball that would be higher performance version of a tropical storm... i.e.  something that doesn't hockey stick when it see friction, or goes like a dart as soon as it see's a drop of carry down.  It's probably harder to design a good dry lane ball than a pure hook monster in some respects.  Should be interesting to see what the future holds...  along with a spitfire, I might get hot rod pearl fill in the low end in my arsenal.  As mentioned earlier in this thread storms 'low end' balls are still pretty strong.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Cobalt Bomb on January 30, 2009, 10:59:26 PM
It is true that Storm is lacking a weaker coverstock ball. The Creature and Link from 900g are excellent examples of balls with weaker covers than anything Storm has right now, and could use in their lineup. Even the Jolt cover was too strong to be a true dry lane ball.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: charlest on January 31, 2009, 09:49:40 AM
quote:
What about those silly "Trick Layouts" Tommy Jones used to use taking a long pin (4-5) and placing it real high:
--P--
-----
-0-0-
--c--
--O--
Anyone try this before?  Just wondering.  Like I said, dry lanes are my biggest enemy
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"


Those are useful to him, NOT as a way of handling dry lanes, but BECAUSE he has a lot of ball speed. Those are not dry lanes drillings. They're Tommy Jones/PBA drillings. Most of them can be very snappy. His ball speed reduces that snap.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: charlest on January 31, 2009, 09:52:59 AM
quote:
It is true that Storm is lacking a weaker coverstock ball. The Creature and Link from 900g are excellent examples of balls with weaker covers than anything Storm has right now, and could use in their lineup. Even the Jolt cover was too strong to be a true dry lane ball.


The Creatures use Super-Flex, not a weak coverstock by anyone's imagination. Their utility is very silimar to the Street Rods. The SRs are slightly snappier but not a lot more, when both have the same surface finish.

Not sure what the Link uses, but its high RG core, approximately 2.6, very like the Tropical Storm, and low differential is what allows it to be used on lighter oils.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: A_P_K on January 31, 2009, 10:05:56 AM
quote:

Not sure what the Link uses, but its high RG core, approximately 2.6, very like the Tropical Storm, and low differential is what allows it to be used on lighter oils.


True but for me with the same layout the Link is boards above stronger than the Neptune was.  I'd say even though it's a good light oil piece take care with your layout.


--------------------
The original Pin Krusher


Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: jbruno6 on January 31, 2009, 10:40:06 AM
quote:
quote:
My rev rate is med-high, 15mph speed, high track (pap is 5 3/8 3/8 up).  So any help on the dry is needed! I have been strugling all season and cannot figure out ANYTHING on dry lanes.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"



We pretty much have the same PAP, speed, revs.  I tried alot also, but I have found an answer so far:  A Hammer Razyr, taken down to 1000, with a light polish.
--------------------




Everyone chose to ignore my Razyr suggestion.  Keep drilling out your Links, Vibes, Creature Pearls, Neptunes.  I've had them all.  Good luck......
--------------------
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Cobalt Bomb on January 31, 2009, 11:02:39 AM
quote:
quote:
It is true that Storm is lacking a weaker coverstock ball. The Creature and Link from 900g are excellent examples of balls with weaker covers than anything Storm has right now, and could use in their lineup. Even the Jolt cover was too strong to be a true dry lane ball.


The Creatures use Super-Flex, not a weak coverstock by anyone's imagination. Their utility is very silimar to the Street Rods. The SRs are slightly snappier but not a lot more, when both have the same surface finish.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not sure what the Link uses, but its high RG core, approximately 2.6, very like the Tropical Storm, and low differential is what allows it to be used on lighter oils.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Super-Flex-1995-96 technology
Reactor 2005-06 technology
Which do you think is stronger?

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."


Edited on 1/31/2009 12:03 PM

Edited on 1/31/2009 12:03 PM
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: SVstar34 on January 31, 2009, 11:12:04 AM
Cobalt Bomb, SuperFlex still isnt that weak by today's standards
--------------------
My Arsenal:
Bounty(4.5 x 4.75 Fresh 1000 Abralon)
Twisted Fury(5 x 4 500 Abralon + Reacta Shine)
Raw Hammer Pain(Leverage 1000 Abralon)
Blue Vibe(5 x 5 4000 Abralon + Reacta Shine)

Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: Stormkid84 on January 31, 2009, 11:18:48 AM
I'm not ignoring your Rayzr comments, but balls without a core hit like junk for me.  Had a Hit, the thing out hooked some of my stuff.  I just feel there has to be another option besides plastic.
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: jbruno6 on January 31, 2009, 11:38:37 AM
No prob, good luck
--------------------
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: KingofKings696 on January 31, 2009, 11:44:04 AM
Well I have issues keeping balls right and took an avalanche pearl with a weak drilling and took the surface to 4k abralon with heavy polish and it allowed me to play up the boards and keep around the pocket all night.
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: six pack on January 31, 2009, 11:48:24 AM
I wish STORM would bring back the original Thunder Flash,mine is just about all worn out.the T-Flash polished has been the best lite oil ball I've owned.
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: David Lee Yskes on January 31, 2009, 12:09:28 PM
I still say my best dry lane ball was the old HotRod, which I had drilled 4x4, and then polished with some Diamond gloss.   And the ball was amazing on even burnt shots.   Right now I still have my old BarbWire, which I just sent to the rejuve machine and then had polished like a mirror.  

But as for a complete dry lane ball, i have a old Urethane Red Hammer that i use, and on flying backends that ball is the nuts, cuz it hook/sets into the pocket so the only thing i have to worry about is carry.  

As for being diss'd about using a plastic ball who gives a crap, they are just jealous.   back in the late 90's the house i bowled at was having a Oil embargo, and anything with a coverstock hooked alot, so I bought myself a Clear Wolf, and was still able to play a nice hook with the ball.
--------------------
" Lift Your Skirt Grab Your Balls and Learn How to Bowl "   http://coolluvr4u1976.bowlspace.com/
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: charlest on January 31, 2009, 01:21:20 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
It is true that Storm is lacking a weaker coverstock ball. The Creature and Link from 900g are excellent examples of balls with weaker covers than anything Storm has right now, and could use in their lineup. Even the Jolt cover was too strong to be a true dry lane ball.


The Creatures use Super-Flex, not a weak coverstock by anyone's imagination. Their utility is very silimar to the Street Rods. The SRs are slightly snappier but not a lot more, when both have the same surface finish.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not sure what the Link uses, but its high RG core, approximately 2.6, very like the Tropical Storm, and low differential is what allows it to be used on lighter oils.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Super-Flex-1995-96 technology
Reactor 2005-06 technology
Which do you think is stronger?

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."


Edited on 1/31/2009 12:03 PM

Edited on 1/31/2009 12:03 PM


Super-Flex. The date it was created or labeled has nothing to do with it.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: los2003 on January 31, 2009, 01:40:46 PM
yup i have a couple balles like thins.. it just caouse tighter flare rings the ball will still hook.. if you have a lover rev rate it may not move though

quote:
What about those silly "Trick Layouts" Tommy Jones used to use taking a long pin (4-5) and placing it real high:
--P--
-----
-0-0-
--c--
--O--
Anyone try this before?  Just wondering.  Like I said, dry lanes are my biggest enemy
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: six pack on January 31, 2009, 02:44:07 PM
quote:
What about those silly "Trick Layouts" Tommy Jones used to use taking a long pin (4-5) and placing it real high:
--P--
-----
-0-0-
--c--
--O--
Anyone try this before?  Just wondering.  Like I said, dry lanes are my biggest enemy
--------------------
Me: "These lanes are tight. I have 2 boards!"
My buddy with front 8: "Me too!"
Me: "Yeah, but yours both have arrows on them, and an arrow in between!"



I have a layout like this on a playmaker(pic in my profile)and it's not a weak layout.put it on a high rg core and the thing will probably flip like mad.
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Title: Re: Weak Cover
Post by: KingofKings696 on January 31, 2009, 10:22:29 PM
You could try a layout like this:


0 0    p

  c

 0

This setup puts pin 1 inch off my pap then change surface as needed I found 4k abralon with polish is good.