win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: new balls on site  (Read 1460 times)


 

Xfest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2006, 01:35:52 PM »
ty
--------------------

Mean Machine (heavy oil)
Machine (medium oil)
Desert Heat (light oil)
Ambush (used for spares - any condition)

Join the revolution.
www.trackbowling.com
- Kenny "The Kid" Skidmore
The Bowler's Shop, Anderson IN
      "Now that's MONEYYY!"

Brunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2006, 01:37:51 PM »
I think they need to get everything right before they post....look at the backend ratings.  Both equal 0
--------------------
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely, in a pretty and well preserved body; but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming. "Wow, What a @*#% ride!!!"

kayoung08

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2006, 01:38:48 PM »
0? when i pull it up it says n/a. that is different than 0.
--------------------
www.myspace.com/gotti13
www.myspace.com/kayoung08
www.trackbowling.com
www.startabowlingrevolution.com

Brunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2006, 01:44:11 PM »
I see that now, but if you go to the current ball line, the equation and the MM are listed at backend = 0
--------------------
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely, in a pretty and well preserved body; but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming. "Wow, What a @*#% ride!!!"

kayoung08

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2006, 01:54:16 PM »
who needs back end anyway? the poor performance of the columbia sites( although this week has been much better) youre lucky its up and you can see it at all.
--------------------
www.myspace.com/gotti13
www.myspace.com/kayoung08
www.trackbowling.com
www.startabowlingrevolution.com

Brunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2006, 01:56:03 PM »
I hear ya, but until people start getting the ball and poting reviews, the webpage is the only info I have.
--------------------
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely, in a pretty and well preserved body; but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming. "Wow, What a @*#% ride!!!"

kayoung08

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2006, 02:01:05 PM »
a few on here have the mean machine and have posted comments.
--------------------
www.myspace.com/gotti13
www.myspace.com/kayoung08
www.trackbowling.com
www.startabowlingrevolution.com

FastTracker33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3472
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2006, 09:47:43 PM »
the Equation has a length of 19.0! wow thats some good length! lol
--------------------
-Brian

kreitz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2006, 02:33:53 PM »
I recently received my Mean Machine from Track (June 25th ball a day give away).The drilling and spec sheet included with it gives no reference to the backend rating as the previous sheets did. My best guess is that Track is trying to do away with the previous rating system and implement a newer version. In addition to the elimination of the backend rating, the length rating is based on a scale of 1-30 instead of the older 1-10 and the hook rating is now on a 1-80 scale instead of giving a dull\ polished rating as in the past. Just some observations that i noticed after reading this post.

Ken

Weaser

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Re: new balls on site
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2006, 04:32:29 PM »
I would like the ratings of the balls currently listed on the website to be converted to the new scale eventhough most will not be in the current line.  Having some balls currently listed as the old scale, it will be virtually impossible to compare old with the new. My 2 cents.
--------------------
Gary from MO