Author Topic: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION? (Read 886 times)

DukeHarding · « **on:** January 17, 2005, 04:07:36 PM »

Is the coverstock on the EXCEPTION much more aggressive than the cover on the SLASH?

I had the SLASH drilled up 4 x 5. I really like the ball. Have used it with success on medium oil, light oil and even a drier condition. On Track's web site they imply that it's for heavier oil. I've used it twice on heavier oil, with less than satisfactory results.
I'm thinking of buying a 2nd SLASH with a different layout, or an EXCEPTION drilled 4 x 5.

Ball is more aggressive than my ELITE was. It's a keeper / sleeper.
--------------------
Duke Harding

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'd Rather be Lucky than Good.

tenpinspro · « **Reply #1 on:** January 18, 2005, 04:13:46 AM »

Hey Duke,

They mentioned that the ball can handle "even heavier oil" but not really for true heavy. The sanded cover is what can grab a little more in comparison to our polished covers but it really isn't for "heavy oil" as we define it here.

My Xception compared to the Slash is a much longer look and hard backend where the Slash picks up sooner and rolls more evenly (somewhat like the FAZ). I'd have to say drilled the same, these properties would still hold pretty true because of the advanced level of the Rev-Lever core. I don't see the Slash having that strong a backend reaction even polished compared to an Xception if they are both drilled to have good backend strengths. Hope this helps...
--------------------
Rick Leong
Ten Pins Pro Shop
Track Intl. - Amateur/Pro Shop Staff
Vise Inserts Staff

clintdaley · « **Reply #2 on:** January 18, 2005, 07:16:43 AM »

Once again, I agree with Ten. The X-Ception is designed to go long and have a huge backend, while the Slash's OOB surface makes it want to grab early. Obviously, dull balls grab earlier (roll sooner due to friction being created from the dull surface) and have less backend, and pearl/polished balls go longer (more skid due to less friction because of the pearl/polished surface) and saves more energy for the backend.

I agree, the Slash is a KEEPER. Great tourney ball for about anyone.

Clint
--------------------
Clint Daley-Owner
Lets Go Bowling Daley
Salem, Ohio 44460
TRACK ADVISORY PRO SHOP STAFF

DukeHarding · « **Reply #3 on:** January 18, 2005, 08:00:08 AM »

Ric & Clint,

I guess I'll have to buy an Xception.

Thanks.
--------------------
Duke Harding

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'd Rather be Lucky than Good.

clintdaley · « **Reply #4 on:** January 18, 2005, 08:05:58 AM »

Anytime!

Clint
--------------------
Clint Daley-Owner
Lets Go Bowling Daley
Salem, Ohio 44460
TRACK ADVISORY PRO SHOP STAFF

C-G ProShop-Carl · « **Reply #5 on:** January 18, 2005, 11:22:58 AM »

Duke,

2 totally different balls and totally different reactions. The Slash tends to roll earlier and the Xception gets down the lane with unmatched backend reaction. The core seperates the 2 for me. Where the Slash is fantastic at its price point, the Xception tends to perform better on different conditions.

-EX-
--------------------
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Amateur/Pro Shop Staff

Author Topic: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION? (Read 886 times)

DukeHarding

Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION?

tenpinspro

Re: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION?

clintdaley

Re: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION?

DukeHarding

Re: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION?

clintdaley

Re: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION?

C-G ProShop-Carl

Re: Difference in reaction SLASH vs EXCEPTION?