win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Pamela Jackson  (Read 2581 times)

strikeking

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Pamela Jackson
« on: July 10, 2012, 02:30:02 PM »
Explain this!  Pamela Jackson scores 547 in classic singles and is in 8th place while the 9th place score is 622 and 7th place is 625.  Wake Up USBC!!!!!
Logged
Strikeking

 

Bowling 300 900

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Pamela Jackson
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2012, 02:33:54 PM »
Probably was some sort of typo on their part.
Logged

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: Pamela Jackson
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2012, 03:03:43 PM »
Are names really necessary?
Logged
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

Buckwild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1038
Re: Pamela Jackson
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2012, 03:12:54 PM »
Quote from: Bowling 300 900 on July 10, 2012, 02:33:54 PM
Probably was some sort of typo on their part.

+1. Probably was 647.
Logged

strikeking

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Pamela Jackson
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2012, 04:57:15 PM »
If it was 647, she's still in the wrong spot.
Logged
Strikeking

strikeking

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Pamela Jackson
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2012, 04:58:45 PM »
What is the "problem" with names??
Logged
Strikeking

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Pamela Jackson
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2012, 08:07:58 PM »
Why not send this information to USBC or call them? No one on here is going to do it for you or who ever above is effected by it.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.
Pages: [1]
« previous next »