BallReviews

General Category => USBC Tournament => Topic started by: txbowler on January 29, 2010, 04:54:53 AM

Title: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: txbowler on January 29, 2010, 04:54:53 AM
Why is the pattern never of the longer variety?
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: michelle on January 29, 2010, 01:32:32 PM
The 'bowlers' would complain.
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Fishbowl815 on January 29, 2010, 01:40:33 PM
what bowlers complain? never heard of that before
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Dan Belcher on January 29, 2010, 01:55:04 PM
quote:
what bowlers complain? never heard of that before
The ones who want to be able to play 2nd arrow no matter what.
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Thunder835 on January 29, 2010, 02:08:14 PM
quote:
quote:
what bowlers complain? never heard of that before
The ones who want to be able to play 2nd arrow no matter what.


With their 20 year old ball!
--------------------
Track PBA Regional Staff

http://s318.photobucket.com/albums/mm427/thunder835/Track%20Equipment/

Evolutionary. Revolutionary.
People don't lack strength, they lack will.
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Strapper_Squared on January 29, 2010, 07:02:39 PM
the 30 clean pot would carry over to the following year...
--------------------
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
After an 18 mo. hiatus, I'm back...
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Russell on January 29, 2010, 07:15:31 PM
quote:
quote:
what bowlers complain? never heard of that before
The ones who want to be able to play 2nd arrow no matter what.


What's funny is they won't be the ones complaining the most.  It will be the crowbar kings that need the bounce right to get their equipment to come back.  

I personally would love to see them make the pattern shorter one year around 35/36 feet.
--------------------
Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: someguyintucson on January 29, 2010, 07:18:39 PM
I would probably throw splits and miss easy spares...oh wait...thats what I've done for the past two years at Nationals :/
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: MI 2 AZ on January 29, 2010, 09:32:11 PM
quote:
I would probably throw splits and miss easy spares...oh wait...thats what I've done for the past two years at Nationals :/  


That could be my post, except it would read ...past ten times at Nationals.


--------------------

_________________________________________

New to BR? - Please check this:  BR FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Russell on January 29, 2010, 09:47:38 PM
quote:
I would probably throw splits and miss easy spares...oh wait...thats what I've done for the past two years at Nationals :/


Yeah me too...I'm one of the aforementioned "crowbar guys" that shoots 1700 every year...I just don't complain about the shot
--------------------
Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: txbowler on January 30, 2010, 12:36:36 PM
I guess I should have been more specific.  Does a long pattern shut out certain styles or make breaking down the lanes in team more or less difficult?
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Russell on January 30, 2010, 01:08:52 PM
quote:
I guess I should have been more specific.  Does a long pattern shut out certain styles or make breaking down the lanes in team more or less difficult?


I think those with lower revrates would be punished a bit...which is most of the people that go to nationals.  The tour doesn't have this problem because the lowest revrates out there are higher than 95% of league bowlers.

If you watch other people at nationals the majority are going straight up the lane on a 39 foot pattern...they would have no chance of carrying if they can get the ball to the pocket on a longer pattern.

That's just my opinion and I could be wrong...
--------------------
Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: sdbowler on January 30, 2010, 01:17:42 PM
Are you talking if they left everything the same and just went a few feet longer? With going longer they could throw out so  many different options. I have not been to a Nationals event in like 6 yrs so I have no idea of what the pattern is like right now. Going off of what I have bowled on IF they just went longer there would be A LOT of complaining going on. I have seen many guys have problems getting the ball to wrinkle the it is. I could not imagine would it would be like if they just went longer.
--------------------
Kyle
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: JessN16 on January 31, 2010, 03:48:12 PM
I've yet to bowl nationals but I've bowled on the Nationals shot 2-3 times. I've found it too short. So if it was lengthened, it would probably benefit me personally.

It also felt like the volume was pretty low. It was a lot lower than I was expecting it to be, anyway.

Jess
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: laddog54 on February 01, 2010, 12:45:30 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
what bowlers complain? never heard of that before
The ones who want to be able to play 2nd arrow no matter what.


What's funny is they won't be the ones complaining the most.  It will be the crowbar kings that need the bounce right to get their equipment to come back.  

I personally would love to see them make the pattern shorter one year around 35/36 feet.
--------------------
Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"


Anyone remember Tulsa?
--------------------
ROTO GRIP - King of Them All
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Dan Belcher on February 01, 2010, 01:17:47 PM
quote:
I've yet to bowl nationals but I've bowled on the Nationals shot 2-3 times. I've found it too short. So if it was lengthened, it would probably benefit me personally.

It also felt like the volume was pretty low. It was a lot lower than I was expecting it to be, anyway.

Jess
I practiced a little on the Nationals pattern at my home center before going to Vegas last year, and the difference in how the shot played at home (different brand of oil, AMF HPLs instead of Brunswick Anvilane) from Vegas was night and day.  I need a lot more surface than I anticipated in the tournament. The breakpoint was about 2-3 boards further inside because my ball was not picking up as soon on the lane as it did at my home center. Even in the minor events on the burn, it still played tighter than I anticipated, and I ended up using a Gravity Shift sanded down by hand with Valentino's Resurrection, and still felt like I could have used a touch more surface on the second pair of lanes I went to that played a little tight downlane compared to the first pair. Conversely, I threw polished stuff at home center on the same oil pattern!
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: someguyintucson on February 01, 2010, 01:33:01 PM
quote:
quote:
I've yet to bowl nationals but I've bowled on the Nationals shot 2-3 times. I've found it too short. So if it was lengthened, it would probably benefit me personally.

It also felt like the volume was pretty low. It was a lot lower than I was expecting it to be, anyway.

Jess
I practiced a little on the Nationals pattern at my home center before going to Vegas last year, and the difference in how the shot played at home (different brand of oil, AMF HPLs instead of Brunswick Anvilane) from Vegas was night and day.  I need a lot more surface than I anticipated in the tournament. The breakpoint was about 2-3 boards further inside because my ball was not picking up as soon on the lane as it did at my home center. Even in the minor events on the burn, it still played tighter than I anticipated, and I ended up using a Gravity Shift sanded down by hand with Valentino's Resurrection, and still felt like I could have used a touch more surface on the second pair of lanes I went to that played a little tight downlane compared to the first pair. Conversely, I threw polished stuff at home center on the same oil pattern!


Well put. My home house has 2 year old Brunswick Pro Anvilane and the practice shot was about 3-5 boards different than Cashman Center last year.

Did anyone practice at the Silver Nugget last year? That was a complete waste of time and money.
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Motogp69 on February 01, 2010, 02:38:50 PM
quote:
Why is the pattern never of the longer variety?


I don't know, but I really wish they would.
--------------------
Videos at:
http://youtube.com/user/Gsnap21

"The framers of our Constitution believed that if the people were to be sovereign and belong to different religions at the same time then our official religion would have to be no religion at all. It was a bold experiment then as it is now. It wasn't meant to make us comfortable, it was meant to make us free."
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: MI 2 AZ on February 01, 2010, 09:10:22 PM
quote:
I practiced a little on the Nationals pattern at my home center before going to Vegas last year, and the difference in how the shot played at home (different brand of oil, AMF HPLs instead of Brunswick Anvilane) from Vegas was night and day. I need a lot more surface than I anticipated in the tournament. The breakpoint was about 2-3 boards further inside because my ball was not picking up as soon on the lane as it did at my home center. Even in the minor events on the burn, it still played tighter than I anticipated, ...


Could the main factor be because the lanes in the convention centers are brand new vs however old the home center lanes are?  Of course there are other factors like temp, altitude, oil machine, etc.


--------------------

_________________________________________

New to BR? - Please check this:  BR FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: r534me on February 02, 2010, 11:01:32 AM
quote:
quote:
quote:
I've yet to bowl nationals but I've bowled on the Nationals shot 2-3 times. I've found it too short. So if it was lengthened, it would probably benefit me personally.

It also felt like the volume was pretty low. It was a lot lower than I was expecting it to be, anyway.

Jess
I practiced a little on the Nationals pattern at my home center before going to Vegas last year, and the difference in how the shot played at home (different brand of oil, AMF HPLs instead of Brunswick Anvilane) from Vegas was night and day.  I need a lot more surface than I anticipated in the tournament. The breakpoint was about 2-3 boards further inside because my ball was not picking up as soon on the lane as it did at my home center. Even in the minor events on the burn, it still played tighter than I anticipated, and I ended up using a Gravity Shift sanded down by hand with Valentino's Resurrection, and still felt like I could have used a touch more surface on the second pair of lanes I went to that played a little tight downlane compared to the first pair. Conversely, I threw polished stuff at home center on the same oil pattern!


Well put. My home house has 2 year old Brunswick Pro Anvilane and the practice shot was about 3-5 boards different than Cashman Center last year.

Did anyone practice at the Silver Nugget last year? That was a complete waste of time and money.


Was the Silver Nugget where they had the BTM at?  If so, I did practice there and it was a waste of time but it was cheap at a buck a game.
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: someguyintucson on February 02, 2010, 11:57:17 AM
quote:
Was the Silver Nugget where they had the BTM at?  If so, I did practice there and it was a waste of time but it was cheap at a buck a game.


Yep
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: txbowler on February 02, 2010, 02:25:07 PM
If it is a 35-36 foot pattern, I'll just break out my pink hammer. LOL
Title: Re: What would happen if the nationals pattern was ever 42-44 ft
Post by: Bigmike on February 03, 2010, 08:00:32 AM
They did make it shorter in Corpus Christi in '06 as it was 37 feet. Outside the second arrow was in play the whole tournament. Good outside, tournament type players shot lights out as Wendy McPherson won the singles with 814. Of course the chuck it right crowd couldn't get anything to stay off the headpin.

I don't recall getting inside of 10 until the singles squad when we were the third shift on the extreme burn.

quote:
quote:
quote:
what bowlers complain? never heard of that before
The ones who want to be able to play 2nd arrow no matter what.


What's funny is they won't be the ones complaining the most.  It will be the crowbar kings that need the bounce right to get their equipment to come back.  

I personally would love to see them make the pattern shorter one year around 35/36 feet.
--------------------
Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"

--------------------
"Why don't you call me sometime.....when you have no class" ~~Rodney Dangerfield to Sally Kellerman, his college professor in Back to School ~~1986

Mike Craig - Storm Products Pro Shop staff -Columbus, OH