BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Visionary => Topic started by: LowRG on June 26, 2008, 07:27:42 PM

Title: Ogre Particle.
Post by: LowRG on June 26, 2008, 07:27:42 PM
Replacing the AMB Particle.  Gray and dark gray.

Hook.
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Grayson on June 27, 2008, 03:52:46 AM
wishfull thinking or reallity?
--------------------
Sebastian Koch
"Have fun and bowl well!" - Grayson
"Some things are made so even idiots won't fail using them.... But I ask what about the genius?" - Grayson

(\_/)
(x_x)
c(')(')

Unoffical Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Hot Water Bath - instructions and experience (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=199058&ForumID=17&CategoryID=5")

Bowling lessons and tips VIDEOS - VERY GOOD! (http://"http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=BowltechBowlingTips&p=r")


Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: mainzer on June 27, 2008, 08:06:33 AM
would be nice
--------------------
MainzerPower
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: dizzyfugu on June 27, 2008, 08:13:16 AM
Any rumors about a Urethane Ogre?
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom:  the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Secrets revealed:  What's a fugu? (http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugu")

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: livespive on June 27, 2008, 08:19:40 AM
I could see it.

THe orge series looks like it will be the Gargoyle series, somethinig for everyone, so it would only make sense to add the those two balls to that line.
--------------------
Eric T. Spivey, P.E.
 Visionary Test Staff Member
http://www.visionarybowling.com
http://www.maysbowlingandbilliards.com
Ball Reviews FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
BR.com search hack:  http://www.bowling-info.com/Search.html
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Oskuposer on June 27, 2008, 08:21:01 AM
I will believe it when i see it
--------------------
Kiall Hill
Visionary test staff
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Nor Cal Bowler on June 27, 2008, 09:28:19 AM
yeah that would be nice if that happened!
--------------------
Visionary Test Staffer 08/09
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: LowRG on June 30, 2008, 08:22:22 AM
Yes, I saw it at nationals as well and it is true.
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Lillen on June 30, 2008, 08:53:58 AM
Hmmmm...   Sounds interesting...  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: ibowled286 on June 30, 2008, 08:55:42 AM
I think I would be much more interested in a urithane, I really hope that one happens in the next year or so.
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: VideoBallReviews on June 30, 2008, 09:00:01 AM
Well since we have a confirmed sighting ill break my silence on this ball

i have thrown it twice now, both times on a THS...this thing will be KING of taming any type of over/under reaction.  So smooth and even off the dry, but rolls strong in the oil.  You will need oil to throw this ball, but the low differental core helps it get down lane better than the granite and of course the AMB Particle...gave me alot of room to work with from a deeper angle on the typical house shot, only time i didnt get back to the pocket is when i hit the dry VERY early.

Compared to the other ogres, it is earlier and smoother than all 3...handles oil better than the original solid

This thing is going to be great for super walled house shots where it is an over/under nightmare, i cant wait to throw it on more volume to see the true potential of this beast.  I have a feeling its going to be real good at playing straighter angles on the longer PBA patterns, and taming the over reaction on the shorter patterns...
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")
Valentino Bowling...click here for 5% off your next order! (http://"http://valentinobowling.com/vbr.html")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on June 30, 2008, 09:02:44 AM
Like Gary aka MI2AZ says with his Sgt. Schulz impersonation "I know nothing!"    
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: VideoBallReviews on June 30, 2008, 09:06:26 AM
quote:
Britton YOU SUCK!!!  

How dare you keep a HUGE F-ing secret like that from us.  LOL
--------------------
Bowling Nerd Herd (TM) Member



Haha

If it makes you feel any better im filming the video for it tomorrow
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")
Valentino Bowling...click here for 5% off your next order! (http://"http://valentinobowling.com/vbr.html")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Lillen on June 30, 2008, 10:12:05 AM
Britton - Do you know if it's a light load particle ball? Medium? Heavy?
--------------------
www.eko-bowling.se

www.teamtuba.se

www.dteracing.se
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: BigWillyStyle on June 30, 2008, 04:29:57 PM
This is just complete speculation, but I would have to assume by the description of it's reaction, that it's a lower-load ball for 2 reasons:

1) I wouldn't figure that a higher load particle solid would have ANY sort of good shot on a THS (unless a very heavy THS), and

2) Why have 2 high-load particles in your current line-up?

Like I said though...all just me guessing...

Big Willy Style


quote:
Britton - Do you know if it's a light load particle ball? Medium? Heavy?
--------------------
www.eko-bowling.se

www.teamtuba.se

www.dteracing.se

--------------------
Just my $0.02 so take it for what the Foreign Exchange values it at!
"I was raised by a cup of coffee..."
***This message brought to you by the A.O.B.U.B.O.A. (Assembly Of Back-Up Bowlers Of America) which is now taking applications***  

Honorary Member of the F.O.S. (and also the best back-up bowler the Saws have ever had)!
Visionary Test Staff Member '08-'09
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: tommymo on June 30, 2008, 05:03:55 PM
This is great news!!! I love my Ogre Pearl and was planning on picking up the SS before fall leagues.  Now I'll have to get this too!!!  I can't wait!!!
--------------------
Becoming a father isn't difficult, But it's very difficult to be a father.

10/21/05 Kaitlyn Emily and  02/01/07 Meghan Alexis, Daddy's little girls!

R.I.P Kevin Trombley 11/26/05 You were taken too soon!

Visionary Test Staff Member 07/08
Frankie May Gryphon
Immortal Pearl
Ogre Pearl
B/G Centaur

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Juggernaut on June 30, 2008, 05:17:53 PM
quote:
2) Why have 2 high-load particles in your current line-up?


  Which two do you speak of?  The Granite is gone, and so is the AMB particle ( I think).

  If I remember correctly, even though they are "grandfathered" in, the USBC requested that visionary discontinue production of balls outside of the now legal range and, as a result of this, visionary has discontinued production of the AMB balls because their differential is too high.  That includes the Centaurs ( except the green/blue) AND the Immortals.


 I think I would've rather seen a particle cover on the G-3/Frankie May weightblock.  More differential for when you actually NEED a heavy load particle to cut through.
--------------------
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Good transactions list in my profile



My Bowl.com member page (http://"http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=2243&suffix=4831")



Edited on 6/30/2008 5:20 PM
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: shelley on June 30, 2008, 06:26:59 PM
quote:
This is just complete speculation, but I would have to assume by the description of it's reaction, that it's a lower-load ball for 2 reasons:

1) I wouldn't figure that a higher load particle solid would have ANY sort of good shot on a THS (unless a very heavy THS), and

2) Why have 2 high-load particles in your current line-up?


They've had two high-load particle balls in the line-up for quite a while now, the Granite and the AMB Particle, so it's not a big deal to have two.

Why you'd need or want a high-load particle solid for a THS, I can certainly answer.  I'm speed-dominant, so the extra-strong cover helps get the ball to react.  Further, just because it's a high-load particle ball that comes OOB at 320-grit doesn't mean it has to stay that way.  My Yeah Baby is a high-load particle ball, drilled strong, even, and at 1000-grit plus polish, it's a great THS ball.  Absolutely ignores carrydown, which can be a problem here.

SH
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: MI 2 AZ on June 30, 2008, 08:01:21 PM
quote:
Any rumors about a Urethane Ogre?


PM

--------------------

I am the Sgt Schultz of bowling.
"I know nothing! I see nothing! NOTHING!"
_________________________________________

New to BR? - Please check this:  BR FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: rustylegacy on June 30, 2008, 08:31:18 PM
I think it will be good with a lower diff, I bowled the US Open pattern for the past 2 weeks. I tried the AMB centaur at box, then at 600. It was the only ball I saw that hooked, and it still rolled out. I bumped it up to 2000 abr but who knows when Ill get to use it again. I think the monster cover with the weaker core would be sweet.
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: SVstar34 on June 30, 2008, 08:48:00 PM
gonna be interesting with the Ogre Particle, I might change my mind now and go for it. I was looking at LaneMasters new release Dynamic Power which is a Solid Particle, not anymore.
--------------------
My Arsenal:
Twisted Fury
Raw Hammer Pain
Blue Vibe

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: dizzyfugu on July 01, 2008, 06:47:39 AM
I think that the Particle Ogre will be a good addition, and the lower differential actually saves energy for the back end - so you can drill ikt strong, and it should show a continuous move.
There have already been similar concepts (e. g. Hammer's Big Blue, low RG and low diff., Navy Sparkle Fuze with high RG and diff.), and IMHO it should have at least a medium particle load (and/or some bigger particle to create a good grip), and you have a true versatile piece that you can tune with surface tweaks for different uses. But I admit that a lower RG/high diff. ball like the AMB Particle would be a useful "true" heavy oil addition, too, e. g. the same cover and with the (legal) Gryphon core.
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom:  the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Secrets revealed:  What's a fugu? (http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugu")

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: BigWillyStyle on July 01, 2008, 08:27:32 AM
Like I said...only speculating.

I will say this though, I keep forgetting that the Centaurs (minus the B/G) have the "illegal" weight block, as I always just think of the Immortals when thinking about the grandfathered rule (since they were the 2 they squeezed in).

As for the Granite and AMB in the lineup together for a long time....I didn't think that the AMB Particle was out for too long before the Granite was discontinued...

Big Willy Style


--------------------
Just my $0.02 so take it for what the Foreign Exchange values it at!
"I was raised by a cup of coffee..."
***This message brought to you by the A.O.B.U.B.O.A. (Assembly Of Back-Up Bowlers Of America) which is now taking applications***  

Honorary Member of the F.O.S. (and also the best back-up bowler the Saws have ever had)!
Visionary Test Staff Member '08-'09
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: ibowled286 on July 01, 2008, 10:21:47 AM
Well sounds like the particle is a sure thing, but has anyone heard of any other new stuff from visionary in the next few months?  I would LOVE to see a urethane, and also a pearl with a low particle load, but that's just me.  I really don't see enough oil to use heavy old balls.
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: River700 on July 01, 2008, 01:33:21 PM
I know this is the visionary section, but does anyone here remember the thunderfalsh urethane? That ball from what people have said flares like 6 inches, but yet is very smooth and controlable, so visionary coming out with an orge urethane would be awesome!!
--------------------
If your going to bowl...bowl for fun or go home
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: ibowled286 on July 01, 2008, 02:10:50 PM
Yes I remember the thunderflash, I had the thunderflash pro and that was my very favorite ball I have ever owned.  I got a good 5-6 inches flair out of it.  I found one on ebay not too long ago but it had a very short pin and so when i had it plugged and redrilled I didn't care for it much.  That is why I would love to see an Ogre or even a AMB urethane.
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: dizzyfugu on July 02, 2008, 02:24:19 AM
quote:
quote:
Any rumors about a Urethane Ogre?


PM

--------------------

I am the Sgt Schultz of bowling.
"I know nothing! I see nothing! NOTHING!"
_________________________________________

New to BR? - Please check this:  BR FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")


Thanks a lot
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom:  the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Secrets revealed:  What's a fugu? (http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugu")

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Juggernaut on July 02, 2008, 06:16:05 PM
Looks like the particle is a done deal.  Check out buddiesproshop.com.

http://www.buddiesproshop.com/product/6183/Visionary_Gray_Ogre_Bowling_Ball.htm
--------------------
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Good transactions list in my profile



My Bowl.com member page (http://"http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=2243&suffix=4831")

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: darkman on July 02, 2008, 08:17:24 PM
Anybody know when this thing is going to be released
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: MI 2 AZ on July 03, 2008, 12:13:59 AM
Jason will probably be on here sometime in the next week or so to pass on the information on the release date.


--------------------

I am the Sgt Schultz of bowling.
"I know nothing! I see nothing! NOTHING!"
_________________________________________

New to BR? - Please check this:  BR FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: mainzer on July 03, 2008, 08:25:35 PM
Particle would be cool but I would me more interested in a Urethane OGRE!
--------------------
MainzerPower
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: charlest on July 03, 2008, 10:56:24 PM
quote:
Well sounds like the particle is a sure thing, but has anyone heard of any other new stuff from visionary in the next few months?  I would LOVE to see a urethane, and also a pearl with a low particle load, but that's just me.  I really don't see enough oil to use heavy old balls.


Jason has already said a month or two ago that he will not be producing any particle pearls. In his testing, he has found little significant (my paraphrasing, not his) difference in ball reaction between particle pearls and polished solid resin balls. I tried to persuade him but failed. I'd love to see the Ogre Particle Pearl, but, based on his words, I doubt we ever will.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")

Edited on 7/4/2008 5:33 AM
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Lillen on July 04, 2008, 01:35:31 AM
quote:
I'd love to see the Ogre Particle Pearl


Second that...  
--------------------
www.eko-bowling.se

www.teamtuba.se

www.dteracing.se
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: BigWillyStyle on July 04, 2008, 02:18:32 AM
I'm sure some of his decision might have to do with the fact that the Purple Ice for many was not as good a Visionary piece as others. Even though it was stated that it was more "condition-specific" people still just want THS equipment. I love my Purple Ice, and think it might be THE 1st ball out of the bag the rest of my PBAX league...

Big Willy Style

PS...I definately third the motion for a PP cover, though I'd rather it be on the Gryphon core (actually, I'd rather it be on the Immortal core, but since that is impossible due to new USBC rules...would be happy with Gryphon core).


quote:
Jason has already said a few month or two ago that he will not be producing any particle pearls. In his testing, he has found little significant (my paraphrasing, not his) difference in ball reaction between particle pearls and polished solid resin balls. I tried to persuade him but failed. I'd love to see the Ogre Particle Pearl, but, based on his words, I doubt we ever will.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")

--------------------
Just my $0.02 so take it for what the Foreign Exchange values it at!
"I was raised by a cup of coffee..."
***This message brought to you by the A.O.B.U.B.O.A. (Assembly Of Back-Up Bowlers Of America) which is now taking applications***  

Honorary Member of the F.O.S. (and also the best back-up bowler the Saws have ever had)!
Visionary Test Staff Member '08-'09
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: charlest on July 04, 2008, 05:40:36 AM
quote:
I'm sure some of his decision might have to do with the fact that the Purple Ice for many was not as good a Visionary piece as others. Even though it was stated that it was more "condition-specific" people still just want THS equipment. I love my Purple Ice, and think it might be THE 1st ball out of the bag the rest of my PBAX league...

Big Willy Style


Big Willy,

I'm far too lazy to go look up what Jason said in that thread, but while the Purple Ice was mentioned, it was not the factor according to Jason. Besides, If I recall correctly (again), the Purple Ice was pearlized and it was particle but it was not resin it was urethane: a Particle pearl urethane. Leave it Jason to find a unique ball reaction!

ANyway, I do specifically recall his saying he saw no difference between a particle pearl and a polished solid resin. Oddly enough, some things do stick in my memory.

That said, I'm still on the "Particle Pearl" bandwagon myself. I would love to see an Ogre Particle Pearl. A Kelly green and BMW silver one! Now THAT would stand out on a ball return.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: BigWillyStyle on July 04, 2008, 09:44:45 AM
quote:
Big Willy,

I'm far too lazy to go look up what Jason said in that thread, but while the Purple Ice was mentioned, it was not the factor according to Jason. Besides, If I recall correctly (again), the Purple Ice was pearlized and it was particle but it was not resin it was urethane: a Particle pearl urethane. Leave it Jason to find a unique ball reaction!

ANyway, I do specifically recall his saying he saw no difference between a particle pearl and a polished solid resin. Oddly enough, some things do stick in my memory.

That said, I'm still on the "Particle Pearl" bandwagon myself. I would love to see an Ogre Particle Pearl. A Kelly green and BMW silver one! Now THAT would stand out on a ball return.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")


How about we add some orange in it...you know...for that extra luck of the irish carry!  

Big Willy Style

PS...that is very interesting to know, as I had never heard that the PIE was a PP Urethane.
--------------------
Just my $0.02 so take it for what the Foreign Exchange values it at!
"I was raised by a cup of coffee..."
***This message brought to you by the A.O.B.U.B.O.A. (Assembly Of Back-Up Bowlers Of America) which is now taking applications***  

Honorary Member of the F.O.S. (and also the best back-up bowler the Saws have ever had)!
Visionary Test Staff Member '08-'09
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: darkman on July 04, 2008, 03:47:37 PM
On correction guys I am pretty sure I remember a thread where jason said the purple executioner was actually both urethane and reactive based, it was some kind of combination/mix I believe!
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 04, 2008, 06:31:27 PM
quote:
I'm far too lazy to go look up what Jason said in that thread, but while the Purple Ice was mentioned, it was not the factor according to Jason. Besides, If I recall correctly (again), the Purple Ice was pearlized and it was particle but it was not resin it was urethane: a Particle pearl urethane. Leave it Jason to find a unique ball reaction!

Anyway, I do specifically recall his saying he saw no difference between a particle pearl and a polished solid resin. Oddly enough, some things do stick in my memory.





Here ya go.   http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=171414&ForumID=15&CategoryID=2
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: gsback on July 07, 2008, 04:07:37 PM
quote:
Here ya go. http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=171414&ForumID=15&CategoryID=2


I played with the settings, but can't get anything on that topic.  That kinda sucks!!

--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: darkman on July 07, 2008, 04:26:10 PM
Ya Me neither
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: DynoMo on July 07, 2008, 04:32:58 PM
quote:
quote:
Here ya go. http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=171414&ForumID=15&CategoryID=2


I played with the settings, but can't get anything on that topic.  That kinda sucks!!


From the BR.com's unofficial FAQ Section post

see back one year http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Preferences.asp?ForumDays=365&NumOfItems=100&UseMessaging=1&submit1=Modify&save=1

see back two years http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Preferences.asp?ForumDays=730&NumOfItems=100&UseMessaging=1&submit1=Modify&save=1
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: jbuzz31 on July 07, 2008, 05:00:30 PM
my question is ,which coverstock will be the base? eradicator like the first two ogres? destroyer like the pearl? or react-a-tak?

and just how much particle load will be in it
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 07, 2008, 05:00:51 PM
Here's the gist of the post that charlest asked Jason....for those that can't see it.

charlest question posted 8/13/2007  

Jason,

1. Let me tell you what I have seen, and in my experience, regarding solid resin vs particle pearls:

To my eye, particle pearls can cover the same oil amount/pattern that solid resin balls do, but they seem to cvoer more boards while doing it
PLUS they seem to handle carrydown better while getting the same length with more backend AND more overall hook. I have seen this with both old particle pearls like the Brunswick Riot Zone, middle older particle pearls like the Hammer Razor Blade and newer ones like the Storm Pyro and the Shift.

The factors of more overall hook and more backend compared to solid resins seems, to my eye, to allow them to handle carrydown better than rougher and earlier hooking solid resin which also handle carrydown, but reduce carry power to an unspecified degree.

2. I would like to see the Ogre coverstock placed in a similar core to the current Ogre BUT with a greater RG differential (like the old Warlock DC cores: medium-high Rg and higher RG differential). I think this will allow them to handle carrydown better than they do now. I see this in my semi-polished "pumpkin" Ogre (polished before the Black/Purple one came out). I think a higher RG diff core drilled correctly would allow it (and the "blurple" Ogre) to handle carrydown better than simply sanding the surface rougher. Most times, sanding the surface won't allow the same ball to be used on the lanes with carrydown.

Thank you.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jason's response 8/14/07

Hi Charlest,

Thank you for the input. I know that in theory, what you are describing is exactly what is supposed to happen, but thus far I haven't really seen that in our testing. I guess it is possible that we simply haven't tested the right balls yet, but I usually try to find what I hear is the most popular ball at the time, and try to see what it is doing that makes it stand out.

Unfortunately, or fortunately (depending on how you look at it), I find that what makes the ball so popular is often times not the reaction, but the hype behind it.

Have you tried the FM Signature Gryphon? While the cover isn't the same as the Ogre, they have similar characteristics, and if anything the React-A-Tack cover is a little stronger overall than the Eradicator. This would give you the med. RG and higher diff that you are describing in your post.

Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Product

--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 07, 2008, 05:02:25 PM
quote:
my question is ,which coverstock will be the base? eradicator like the first two ogres? destroyer like the pearl? or react-a-tak?

and just how much particle load will be in it


Don't think I am letting the cat out of the bag here.  Jason says the particle load will be much like the old Granite Gargoyle including the beard which personally I like.
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: VBPadvertising on July 07, 2008, 10:35:41 PM
OK ladies and gents,

Since the cat is out of the bag, and buddies pro shop must have taken a picture of the ball at Bowl Expo (kudo's to you for being smart enough to think of taking the pic and being the first to put it up on your site), I will go ahead and fill everyone in on the information that I can release right now.

The Ogre Particle does use the coverstock on the Granite.  There are very small changes, but the changes are mostly the pigments used to make the colors.  This ball is what we are calling pewter and black.  It is a grey/black combo.  

It still uses the same core as the other Ogres.

This ball is designed to blend out wet/dry lane conditions, and help combat the carrydown issue that many are facing.  

Absolute, we do make multicolor particle balls, but most of the particles are dark in color, so unless we use a very light load, it is virtually impossible to make good looking colors.  Particle pearls are light loaded, and we can make decent colors that way if we wanted.

Here is a link to a picture

http://img337.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ogrecoreandballcopyal4.jpg

Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products



Edited on 7/7/2008 10:42 PM
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 07, 2008, 10:48:37 PM
Kind of has that Char Ex look Jason.  

It will be a good addition to the Ogre line.
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: gsback on July 08, 2008, 10:55:43 AM
Hmmmm....wondering if I found my next ball!! LOL!!!

Also, thanks to Juggernaut who supplied me the link to get back the history I had under the old ID.  

Jason, I think you and I talked about the Particle Pearls and polished resin in the many emails or in San Antonio.....can't remember.

--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: livespive on July 08, 2008, 11:02:39 AM
quote:
Kind of has that Char Ex look Jason.  

It will be a good addition to the Ogre line.
--------------------
Scott




huh what did someone say Charcoal Executioner?!?!?!?
--------------------
Eric T. Spivey, P.E.
 Visionary Test Staff Member
http://www.visionarybowling.com
http://www.maysbowlingandbilliards.com
Ball Reviews FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
BR.com search hack:  http://www.bowling-info.com/Search.html
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 08, 2008, 11:10:00 AM
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of has that Char Ex look Jason.

It will be a good addition to the Ogre line.
--------------------
Scott



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


huh what did someone say Charcoal Executioner?!?!?!?




Eric,

Don't you think it has that look?  Probably not the phasing.  I'll let you know when I get one.
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: livespive on July 08, 2008, 11:14:25 AM
quote:
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of has that Char Ex look Jason.

It will be a good addition to the Ogre line.
--------------------
Scott



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


huh what did someone say Charcoal Executioner?!?!?!?




Eric,

Don't you think it has that look?  Probably not the phasing.  I'll let you know when I get one.
--------------------
Scott




Yeah I looked at it, and it does have the look.  That's why I had the flashback.
I though they werre actually going to bring it back!!!!!!??lol
--------------------
Eric T. Spivey, P.E.
 Visionary Test Staff Member
http://www.visionarybowling.com
http://www.maysbowlingandbilliards.com
Ball Reviews FAQ (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
BR.com search hack:  http://www.bowling-info.com/Search.html
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: revTrex on July 08, 2008, 11:28:21 AM
Saw the Ogre Particle yesterday, and boy, can I tell you, the feel of the cover just screams "hook." Yep, folks, particles you can feel -- like snow tires.
--------------------
www.900global.com

www.bowlersjournal.com
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: gsback on July 11, 2008, 11:59:26 AM
quote:
Saw the Ogre Particle yesterday, and boy, can I tell you, the feel of the cover just screams "hook." Yep, folks, particles you can feel -- like snow tires.


Wondering, especially after talking with Jason, what a little polish on this baby would do!!  Want something for in between Blue Centaur and the Gladiator.  Possibly this or a similarly polished Frankie May!
--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 11, 2008, 12:12:30 PM
quote:
Want something for in between Blue Centaur and the Gladiator.


No Black and Purple Ogre Pearl?
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: gsback on July 11, 2008, 12:37:09 PM
quote:
No Black and Purple Ogre Pearl?


Already got it Scott.  Love the ball.  Actually....shot 300 with it in league before, just never said anything.

Want something a little more controlled....that's all.
--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 11, 2008, 02:52:50 PM
quote:
Want something a little more controlled....that's all.


4000 ab made mine more controllable from 1500 polished OOB.

Most of us will need a finer finish than a 600 matte or whatever the OOB surface will be on the Ogre Particle unless rolling on heavier oil....if it's like the Granite OOB was/is.  But, I will try it OOB but playing with it to match up.

Britton says his is a smooth rolling one with less over-under that's pretty much how I'd define the B/G Centaur and Solid Gladiator's roll on the backend.
--------------------
Scott

Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: VideoBallReviews on July 11, 2008, 03:23:38 PM
quote:
Most of us will need a finer finish than a 600 matte or whatever the OOB surface will be on the Ogre Particle


Particle should be coming at 1000 Abralon...
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")
Valentino Bowling...click here for 5% off your next order! (http://"http://valentinobowling.com/vbr.html")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: gsback on July 11, 2008, 04:07:39 PM
For the most part, I feel my Gladiator gets down the lane fine and finishes more than strong.  But I want something a little earlier, but more of an arc.

I might actually try another Gladiator with a different drill....not sure.  Same could be said with the Ogre Pearl.
--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: Juggernaut on July 11, 2008, 06:20:37 PM
quote:
Saw the Ogre Particle yesterday, and boy, can I tell you, the feel of the cover just screams "hook." Yep, folks, particles you can feel -- like snow tires.
--------------------
www.900global.com

www.bowlersjournal.com



Straight from Jason:
The Ogre Particle does use the coverstock on the Granite. There are very small changes, but the changes are mostly the pigments used to make the colors. This ball is what we are calling pewter and black. It is a grey/black combo.

quote:
Wondering, especially after talking with Jason, what a little polish on this baby would do!! Want something for in between Blue Centaur and the Gladiator. Possibly this or a similarly polished Frankie May!


  Had a polished Granite.  One of the best all around medium balls I ever used, period.  Not jumpy, not finicky, and not weak.
--------------------
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Good transactions list in my profile



My Bowl.com member page (http://"http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=2243&suffix=4831")



Edited on 7/11/2008 6:21 PM
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: charlest on July 11, 2008, 06:25:59 PM
quote:
For the most part, I feel my Gladiator gets down the lane fine and finishes more than strong.  But I want something a little earlier, but more of an arc.

I might actually try another Gladiator with a different drill....not sure.  Same could be said with the Ogre Pearl.
--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  


Try a lower grit on the Glad, like a 1000 grit Abralon or 1500 grit US scale on even a Rico drilling.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: gsback on July 11, 2008, 06:44:27 PM
quote:
Try a lower grit on the Glad, like a 1000 grit Abralon or 1500 grit US scale on even a Rico drilling.


I don't want to bring the cover down too much.  Then I feel like like I'll be limited more as the balls going to start grabbing way too early.  

I guess I could try the cover change and a different drill as well.  Gotta talk with Jason.  He's seen me throw.  I've got video....not of me, but of the Glad Solid, Ogre Pearl, Violet Gargoyle and Slate Blue.  Just have to get them off the camera.


--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  
Title: Re: Ogre Particle.
Post by: scotts33 on July 11, 2008, 07:56:52 PM
Here's what you are looking for the same ball motion as an NS2 which is higher load particle and I used a small touch of Legends polish.  Perfect arc and roll great on some carry down.  

I think you can do the same thing with the right layout and polish on an FMG.  Great arc and roll the above ball from an Black and Purple and Solid goes to long leaving ringing 10's.
--------------------
Scott