win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?  (Read 11945 times)

revTrex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1354
Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« on: December 10, 2007, 06:50:35 PM »
Title says it all.

 

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6029
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #31 on: December 11, 2007, 03:37:39 PM »
Just rename "other" to 900 Global, or group AMF/900 Global.  There's no reason they shouldn't have their own forum is Banger and Insite, the two Visionary subsidiaries have theirs.  Any arguement against that seems kind of silly.
--------------------
-DJ Marshall
...The Twelve In a Row Pro Shop.  Hyattsville, MD
Coach: University of Maryland Baltimore County Mens Bowling


qstick777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5185
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #32 on: December 11, 2007, 06:05:01 PM »
quote:
Oh it just dawned on me to simply change the name of the company to "OTHER" than we will be just like the rest.


Careful Phil, Ebonite might steal that name too!  It will fit so nicely with their Next ball.  


--------------------
Unoffical Ballreviews.com FAQ

Search Ballreviews entire database here

302efi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2609
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #33 on: December 11, 2007, 06:59:48 PM »
Ballreviews.com is privately owned so they can do what they want.

Stop crying people

People are crying about it not being fair...Is life fair ?

See what you people do to bunny...
--------------------
quote:
I will head to my local pro shop. Right after I buy it online.


When faced with a difficult situation, Jesus asks himself, "What would Chuck Norris do?"

Robo-Arm bowlers SUCK...

newguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #34 on: December 12, 2007, 08:06:38 AM »
We now have our own forum and the next ball the "Other NEXT" followed by the pearl vrsion the "NEXT other"
Guys don't worry we know were the posts are. I wouldn't know where to look if we had our own forum, I'd still flip to "other"
This is not a big deal....motto"under the radar brother, under the radar"
Remeber you can't hit what you can't see.

newguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #35 on: December 18, 2007, 07:26:57 AM »
Black only

dw23

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #36 on: December 18, 2007, 02:25:10 PM »
Another qustion: Why does Faball still have a forum. They should just post in the Hammer forum. Replace Faball with 900 Global.
Deven Walls

Pro Shop Staff Member
Lord Field/Lane Masters
www.lordfield.com and www.lane-masters.com
"Changing Bowling, One Bowler At A Time"

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24495
Re: Banger, Insite forums now up; no 900G?
« Reply #37 on: December 18, 2007, 02:40:10 PM »
I don't believe that all the protest posts here will affect ballreviews and the database that reflect what you would like. Have you and your crew directed any messages to BallReviews-scodaddy21 and/or to BallReviews-TECH to make your case?

I think that the telling factor for him, in the past, with respect to their making forums for MoRich, Dyno-Thane and Lanemasters, has been ONLY the volume of posts discussing their balls. I believe that the number of balls designed and created for sale is not the factor they look at. (Not my decision, theirs!)

While I have not seen the volume of such discussions on 900Global balls, I do believe that Phil Cardinale and his investors are here for the long haul, BUT AGAIN, (I beleive) this is not a factor that Ballreviews looks at to make their decision. I do not have any "in" with them; I state these assumptions based solely on what I have seen happening here over the past 7 years or so.

Good Luck.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ
"None are so blind as those who will not see."