win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: s75 Cover  (Read 9273 times)

tdub36tjt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1542
s75 Cover
« on: November 15, 2010, 12:04:59 AM »
900 Global needs to bring back the s75 cover on something. That cover for me was stronger than any other cover in the 900 Global line-up. At 2000 no polish it was earlier than even my Bounty Hunter. At OOB surface it retained energy and just flat out hooked. And it lasted for a very long time. My s75 has over 200 games and still hooks a lot. Not as much as when it was brand new but still hooks a lot. I just think they should throw this cover on one of the newer cores and see how it does!!

 

OddBalls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3119
Re: s75 Cover
« Reply #31 on: February 17, 2011, 11:43:09 AM »
Mines in the garden with a crack all the way around the ball..


Yes. it's I, the Inverted One..


qstick777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5188
Re: s75 Cover
« Reply #32 on: February 17, 2011, 11:56:22 AM »
Yes, an additive.  I wasn't referring to the technology of "soaker," strictly the name.  I tried to find the old threads about this discussion, but haven't been able to.  Seems that some stuff disappeared after the upgrade, possibly having to do with threads from people that are no longer users....so maybe that is why I can't find them.
 
Anyways, what was basically said (I believe by Phil) was that Ebonite now owned the name "Soaker," so it couldn't be used.....same thing with "SuperFlex."  Now, if you know what to order, you can call up BASF and order "SuperFlex," you just can't call it "SuperFlex."  Same thing with "Soaker."  If you know what chemicals and amounts to order you can have it made......or buy it and mix it in house. 
 
It was likened to the formula for Coca-Cola or the Colonel's blend of spices.  You don't want to patent it because then you have to publish the ingredients and way to make it.  Better to keep it a secret, to which Phil said he still had the "recipe" and we would see it again......and we did.
 
I guess my point was, I'm surprised that 900Global didn't trademark/copyright a name for the S75 cover.....maybe something like "Absorbz" or "Spongz" or something like that.  I'm guessing it had something to do with staying consistent with the cover naming scheme (all numbers) instead of coming up with stuff like "Activator," "Traxion Reactive," "GB," and so on.
 
As it stands now,  we don't know if any release has the special "additive" unless they tell us.
 
Now whether Phil is the ONLY person that knows how to make "soaker,"  that is a different story.
tekneek wrote on 2/17/2011 10:26 AM:
Soaker is an additive not a cover, never patented, trademarked, unless it has been done recently, I assume it can not be done since it is possibly a chemical compound, ISO, or another unnamed "ingredient". My info came from the D/T era, was told it was an additive and its cost was not condusive to be used in anything but high end equipment meaning expensive ingredient !!! Does Ebo own the rights to the "Soaker" as a marketing feature, can't answer that one, I suppose they might, do they own the ingredient, no a chemical manufacturer made it so they own it possibly BASF, Bayer, Dupont can't answer that one either.


Steve
Leading Edge Pro Shop
brinkley2223@yahoo.com
512-755-2947
 
http://stores.shop.ebay.com/Leading-Edge-Pro-Shop__W0QQ_armrsZ1



charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: s75 Cover
« Reply #33 on: February 17, 2011, 01:37:13 PM »
Maybe you guys will have to buy a Radical ball to get the Soaker coverstock??
 
Phil posted this over on the Radical topic in the OTHER company forum:
Posted on 2/17/2011 at 12:35 PM

Thanks  for the support guys, I'm sure we will have some fun with the new  stuff. I'm also sure some "soaker" will reappear. First ball will be out  soon. Asym. .020 mid diff. Pearl. Details to follow.....Going Radical"


"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"Some bowlers are crazy as pickled cats."
 
"None are so blind as those who will not see."