win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Venom vs. Triumph  (Read 1567 times)

bigearv14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
Venom vs. Triumph
« on: February 23, 2006, 02:56:08 PM »
I saw the core specs are nearly identical and both have particle pearl covers, so i guess the covers are the main difference, so...

...how much less aggressive is the Venom? Is the breakpoint similar? Backend?

Thanks

 

VAbowler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: Venom vs. Triumph
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2006, 02:06:39 PM »
I'd like to know also the difference, the Venom is similar to the Triumph AMP, particle pearl cover, core, etc.  I loved my amp, I bought the SJ thinking it would be the same, it wasn't at all as aggressive, would like to know how the
Venom would match up.

bigearv14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
Re: Venom vs. Triumph
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2006, 01:48:52 AM »
i don't think it will be much like the AMP, since the cover on it was solid particle and the venom is particle pearl.

VAbowler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: Venom vs. Triumph
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2006, 01:52:23 AM »
hmm, i know the amp was polished though, so how would the particle pearl match up? would it go longer?  The venom has a medium load particle, so it sounds like it would do well in the midlane and recovering on med conditions. any input