Author Topic: Inferno vs. Bruiser (Read 1162 times)

Sir Bowl-A-Lot · « **on:** November 02, 2003, 05:04:23 PM »

I was wondering how these two would compare on a 41 ft synthetic shot with stripped backends. The person I am posting this question for is a power stroker with high ball speed and a decent amount of revs. His comfort zone is down & in. He currently has a 16# Bruiser (in out-of-box finish) drilled with the pin above and to the right (righty) of his ring finger, with the CG under the palm. He finds this ball goes a tad too long before it breaks. He's basically looking for a ball that will hook about 3-4 boards more than his Bruiser. Will the Inferno fit the bill in an out-of-the-box finish?
--------------------
*This space is currently available for lease*

Edited on 11/3/2003 9:15 AM

DON DRAPER · « **Reply #1 on:** November 03, 2003, 04:00:46 PM »

i would agree with bob and add this as well: i have spoken a great deal with rick benoit of brunswick about these two balls and he says very strongly that the inferno is far superior. we agreed that if you had only enough money for one of them to get the inferno. the inferno is the best reactive ball brunswick has made( in my opinion ).

Author Topic: Inferno vs. Bruiser (Read 1162 times)

Sir Bowl-A-Lot

Inferno vs. Bruiser

DON DRAPER

Re: Inferno vs. Bruiser