win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Ultimate control?  (Read 1056 times)

voidkid89

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
Ultimate control?
« on: December 02, 2005, 10:20:49 AM »
I just had an idea that you may like, or you may not.  I was thinking how much I love my ARC, so smooth.  And I hear how controlable and consistant the catylst cover is, even though its not a hook monster like everyone thought, it is very versitle and predictible and smooth so why not take the ARC core and slap the catylst cover on, or maybe take a little more time on the cover and reduce some of the plasticiser.

Comments?
--------------------
when all else fails, go to your plastic ball and hurl it

check out this awesome chatroom:http://www.freewebs.com/bowlersheaven/bowlingchat.htm

feel free to IM me
yahoo:voidkid89
msn:voidkid89@yahoo.com

 

voidkid89

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
Re: Ultimate control?
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2005, 02:24:58 PM »
no feedback or insight from any one?...I guess this wasn't as a good idea as I thought it would be.
--------------------
when all else fails, go to your plastic ball and hurl it

check out this awesome chatroom:http://www.freewebs.com/bowlersheaven/bowlingchat.htm

feel free to IM me
yahoo:voidkid89
msn:voidkid89@yahoo.com

bighook69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Re: Ultimate control?
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2005, 02:37:12 PM »
i've seen the EPX in action and thaught it had potential to be a great ball, I also have seen the Hyde in action by the same bowler, and it out hooked the EPX but i think they both were reacting greatly for the bowler, so i think the Catalist cover on the Hyde's core would/could be a great combo!
--------------------
------------------
SlickTape Advisory staff member
Track Bowling.com
Evolutionary - Revolutionary
The Revolution
dont forget www.slicktape.com