win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Top Weight  (Read 12689 times)

iamone78

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
Top Weight
« on: November 23, 2012, 12:38:03 PM »
Drilling Gurus, I have a few questions regarding top weight. What is the effect of top weight on an undrilled ball? The reason I ask is that I have a bowler that swears that from previous experience only balls with starting top weight of greater than 3 oz. roll better for him. Does the top weight remain constant after drilling holes in a ball? I would think the top weight will either decrease or increase depending on the depth of the fingers/thumb. Does starting top weight have any bearing on how a ball rolls or matches up for a bowler? And should this be considered when buy a ball (i.e. 3 oz + top weight vs. 2 oz/2.5oz top weight)?

Any insight/information/thoughts on the subject are greatly appreciated. Thanks!
H. S.
#900Global #StrikingWorldwide #GoGlobal
#StormNation
#SquadRG

 

Rightycomplex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1250
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2012, 01:09:14 PM »
Top weight will have more to do with static weights. The higher the top weight the more likely you are to have a hole when moving the CG from the centerline and the bigger the hole will be. I tend to like longer pin, high top weighted balls at the start when I want to create a lot of flare and "maximize" the balls' potential. I like long pin low top weight when I want to create skid flip because I can layout the ball with a higher or with a longer pin to PAP with minimal to no hole, or maybe I can bury the gripping holes a little deeper for customers who dont want a hole. I like the shorter pin balls for going pin under or smoother transitioning layouts and again top weight will determine a hole, high for creating lots of flare with a lower bigger hole and lower for no hole and a smoother transition because you're not creating as much flare. It all depends on the bowlers style and what the driller feels will the help them.

James C. Jones
Orbdrillers Pro Shop Holiday Bowl
Chester, Va.

Hammer Regional/Amateur Staff Member

www.facebook.com/orbdrillers
Orbdrillers.com
Hammerbowling.com

Rightycomplex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1250
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2012, 01:18:40 PM »
I cant speak for the ending top weight as I'm not quite sure how to determine it. I got a general idea but I'm not sure its right. For your friend, he must like weight holes but for most a 2-3" pin with a 2-3 oz top weight will do. These should be factored in when buying a ball for specific layouts. As i mentioned above, there are certain limitations of pin distance and top weight that will keep you from doing what you want and affecting the reaction of the ball. For example short pins for later transitioning layouts will force the driller to either pop a flare reducing weight hole or bury the fingers deeper.
James C. Jones
Orbdrillers Pro Shop Holiday Bowl
Chester, Va.

Hammer Regional/Amateur Staff Member

www.facebook.com/orbdrillers
Orbdrillers.com
Hammerbowling.com

Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2012, 02:39:08 PM »
Top weight is a static positive weight.  Like all positive weights, it will produce more skid in the front and have a bit more reaction at the back end.  Again, this is a static weight and has a very low number of importance on todays ball reaction chart.

On the newer equipment, like already said, the higher the top weight, the bigger the weight hole depending on where the CG ends up after drilling.

For the newer stuff, higher top weight = bigger weight hole, lower top weight =  smaller weight hole.


kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2012, 05:44:03 PM »
With todays equipment the bowler that said he could tell a difference on balls that had more then 3ozs top weight prior to drilling is probably high. It really is that simple.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Anaconda

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2012, 06:12:45 PM »
I saw a ball being sold on ebay listed as a second because it had only .7 top weight. Can this ball be drilled normal or will you have lay it different. Or just forget it.
Dave

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2012, 09:33:14 PM »
Yes. USBC allows  3ozs difference between the top half and bottom half of the ball.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

ccrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2012, 01:17:44 PM »
With todays equipment the bowler that said he could tell a difference on balls that had more then 3ozs top weight prior to drilling is probably high. It really is that simple.

Funny!!!!LMAO and I ain't high............Yet.

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8153
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2012, 01:48:26 PM »
http://www.bowlingfans.com/jeff/ballreactionbasics.html



Top/Bottom Weight
As mentioned previously, bowling balls come with extra weight placed under the center of gravity punch on the ball to balance out the weight taken out by drilling holes.  This weight is called top weight because it is located in the top of the bowling ball.  Bowling balls generally are manufactured with anywhere from two to four ounces of top weight although it is possible to find balls that fall outside that range.  Lightweight balls are made with less top weight generally for two reasons.  Light balls generally are drilled for children so the holes are smaller, meaning there is less weight removed that needs to be balanced out.  Also, since the ball has less total weight, an ounce or two of top weight will have more effect on the ball's dynamics and throw them "out of whack."
Top weight has a similar effect as finger weight: the ball will go longer down the lane and snap a bit more on the backend.  Likewise, bottom weight is like thumb weight in that it makes the ball roll earlier and arc more.
Unlike other static weights, ABC/WIBC regulations allow up to 3 ounces of either top or bottom weight.  This is measured on the dodo scale by comparing the drilled side of the ball (top) to the non-drilled (bottom) side of the ball.
Top and bottom weight are not necessarily caused by shifting the CG away from the center of your grip.  They are more a result of how much extra weight the manufacturer placed in one side of the ball and how much weight is removed from that side during drilling.  However, you can alter top weight and bottom weight by shifting the CG.  Because top/bottom weight are measured by comparing the grip side of the ball (the top) to the non-grip side (the bottom), if you shift the CG away from the center of the grip, you are moving it around the circumference of the ball towards the bottom.  You would be removing top weight (and/or adding bottom weight depending on how you look at it) by shifting the CG.  Therefore, the most top weight you can have in any particular ball after drilling (and before drilling any extra holes) would be if the CG is directly in the center of the grip.


___________________________


To the OP, what is the track of the bowler that said that?  I once had a driller tell me that because of my low track, that top weight would be like additional side weight for me.
_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2012, 08:17:58 PM »
Depending on finger and thumb size balls with around 2 ounces of top weight often end up near 0 top weight after the finger and thumb holes have been drilled.
This is before any weighthole.

Most balls with near 0 statics tend to have less skid and more roll early and ofter have a very smooth look on the lanes but early.  Balls that end up with bottom weight are often very early and not great on anything but a lot of oil usually.

If you want skid more top weight is the usual rule, if you want roll lower top weight.
Larger fingers and thumb often take out about 2 ounces of top weight on most balls, average size hands closer to 1.5 ounces of top weight.  (note switch thumb grips add to these numbers slightly calling for more top weight if you place any importance on ending statics.).

NOTE old fashion weightholes out over 6 3/4 ounces from the grip center (the ball equater between top and bottom) can raise top weight and increase reaction.  The Gravity balance system from lane #1 states it is because of this increased top weight!  Other gurus and Ball reviews advocates will say it is true but for other reasons such as more instability from the PAP or increased flare or nicking the weight block and changing the differential.

All agree that these weightholes say 9 inches from the grip center will increase reaction.  I have several balls with such weightholes and man, does it work to increase reaction.

Also, Angling weightholes out away from the grip center(say 1 inch) while placing them on the VAL or PAP will also often take out material on the bottom side of the ball, increasing top weight and if you believe in that sort of thing thus resulting in increased reaction.  I have found this to be true also.  The primary difference being these angled weightholes seem to preserve midlane and increase backend while the old fashioned 9 inch weightholes seem to just increase length and backend.

Newer weightholes by Mo Pinel labeled as P1 P2 P3 and P4 are another specialty but most increase finger, decrease side and decrease top.  Each of the four have a different effect on reaction.

Hope this is helpful regarding top weights.

Regards,

Luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

Strapper_Squared

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4231
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2012, 07:08:28 AM »
The customer is always right (at least in their own mind).  If they want at least 3 oz STARTING top, then great...  They feel comfortable and satisfied, then all is well.  Keep in mind this is starting and once a layout is chosen and holes are put in the ball, it will change.  As stated above, higher starting top weights mean bigger weight holes (providing a the layout allows), which removes additional material from internals/core of the ball, resulting in altering the core dynamics.  Depending on the location of the hole, this could change reaction from a little to a lot.  So indirectly it could change reaction significantly, on its own, probably not much.

I still bowl with people who truly believe that their ball with "thumb weight" is only good for heavier oil patterns because it gets the ball into a roll earlier, yet they have no idea of the surface finish of the ball, the strength of the coverstock/core combination, or the actual layout of the ball based on their release stats.

S^2
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

iamone78

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2013, 01:18:17 PM »
Thank you everyone to your informative posts. I was able to set they guy up with a good arsenal and he is liking the setup. I talked to him that the biggest thing to influence a balls reaction is the surface. Although statics do factor in to some degree, the surface offered the biggest increase or decrease in a balls reaction. Again, I appreciate everyone taking the time to read and reply to my post.
H. S.
#900Global #StrikingWorldwide #GoGlobal
#StormNation
#SquadRG

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2013, 05:06:19 PM »
Thank you everyone to your informative posts. I was able to set they guy up with a good arsenal and he is liking the setup. I talked to him that the biggest thing to influence a balls reaction is the surface. Although statics do factor in to some degree, the surface offered the biggest increase or decrease in a balls reaction. Again, I appreciate everyone taking the time to read and reply to my post.


When playing with the blueprint software, surface change showed to have biggest effect on the balls reaction.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Top Weight
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2013, 09:24:30 PM »
If anyone here remembers... the results of USBC Ball Motion studies showed that ambient humidity has a more significant affect on ball motion than top weight.