win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Pearl Trimax Vortex 2 vs Original X-Factor.....  (Read 1156 times)

Monster Stitch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1490
Pearl Trimax Vortex 2 vs Original X-Factor.....
« on: October 20, 2003, 08:46:43 PM »
Give me your insights.
Logged

 

Brickguy221

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9918
Re: Pearl Trimax Vortex 2 vs Original X-Factor.....
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2003, 10:29:10 PM »
Depends on lane conditions. I've had both balls. Got rid of the X-Factor and kept the Trimax. For light oil to medium oil, the Trimax is an excellent ball, has a much stronger backend and carrys far better than the X-Factor.



--------------------
In the old days, they used axes to chop up wood...Nowadays, they use "BUZZSAWS".
Logged
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away"

Monster Stitch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Pearl Trimax Vortex 2 vs Original X-Factor.....
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2003, 03:19:27 PM »
Brickguy: So how did the X-Factor work for you. If the Trimax is good for light to Med Oil, wouldn't the X-factor be good for med oil because it pushes down the lane better and has more reaction on the back. That's what i heard from some people. Since the Vortex rolls early and sets up in the back, the X-factor would be good to go longer and have more movement on the back when there is more oil.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »