win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock  (Read 2298 times)

Leftyhi-trak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« on: June 14, 2005, 05:12:10 AM »
Does anyone have any data as to the cover difference on these. Is it a different particle or is the Xcel a medium load and the XXcel a light load? I would like to bring up a NIB Xcel to 1000 and was wondering how close the reaction might be to the XXcel.
Logged

 

InternationalBowler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2005, 01:24:58 PM »
From my experience the cover on the Xcel is much stronger. I have both balls withe the same layouts and the Xcel is much earlier and a more even at the breakpoint than the XXcel (same surface prep).
Logged

the pizz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 513
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2005, 02:27:35 PM »
you most likely will not get a similar reaction because the cores are different. not by much, but enough to change the characteristics of the ball.
--------------------
Paul Smith
04/05 PBA West Region Rookie of the Year
Ebonite Regional Staff
"Bowl to Win"
Logged

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7605
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2005, 03:33:15 AM »
I have a Xxcel and I got it NIB with a 1000 grit polish. As far as I can tell, the coverstock is very stong on medium to medium-oily conditions, but on a fresh long shot the polish has not enough grip. It is not the heavy oil ball I thought it would be. I suppose a matte 1000 or 800 grit finish will let it handle more oil well, and I am not sure where the XXcel might fit, especially with the Xcel Particle on top?

Besides, from the core pictures Ebonite has shown, both Xxcel and XXxcel seem to have the same Scalien core with additional flip nuggets, but the picture seems only to be taken from different angles?
--------------------

DizzyFugu --- Reporting from Germany

Team "X" league website: http://homepage.mac.com/timlinked/

"All that we see or seem, is but a dream within a dream..." - Edgar Allen Poe
Logged
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

the pizz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 513
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2005, 12:04:13 PM »
quote:

Besides, from the core pictures Ebonite has shown, both Xxcel and XXxcel seem to have the same Scalien core with additional flip nuggets, but the picture seems only to be taken from different angles?


The core on the xxxcel is turned 90 degrees. This is why the ball rolls differently and flares quite a bit more.
--------------------
Paul Smith
04/05 PBA West Region Rookie of the Year
Ebonite Regional Staff
"Bowl to Win"
Logged

ambi1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 769
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2005, 03:59:42 AM »
Pizz- would you suggest Xcel-XXXcel combo.. or Xcel - XXcel am after flexibility

thanks in advance..
--------------------


DARK BEER IT IS THEN!
Logged


DARK BEER IT IS THEN!

the pizz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 513
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2005, 10:17:04 AM »
quote:
Pizz- would you suggest Xcel-XXXcel combo.. or Xcel - XXcel am after flexibility

thanks in advance..


It depends on what gaps u need to fill, and the different type of conditions you play on.

Each ball has its advantages for me. If u drill each ball within its own characteristics, then I'd say xxcel and xxxcel would be good. I think the xcel is a great ball, but unless u drilled it completely different than the other 2, you really won't need it.
--------------------
Paul Smith
04/05 PBA West Region Rookie of the Year
Ebonite Regional Staff
"Bowl to Win"
Logged

tonybowls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Xcel vs XXcel coverstock
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2005, 11:33:33 AM »
V2 POWER BABY!!!!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »