win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Hammer Hazard  (Read 8852 times)

mmcfarland300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Hammer Hazard
« on: July 16, 2008, 07:39:27 AM »
I thought Jeff said this was put on hold but I found it listed on Bowlingball.com for sale.  It looks like it might be a limited release because it is listed for right handers only go figure here is the link.

http://www.bowlingball.com/Bowling-Ball-6538/hammer-hazard.html

 

jbuzz31

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2008, 02:16:39 PM »
whose gonna be the first lefty to pick one up and put a big ole honkin weight hole on it?
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason

mmcfarland300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2008, 02:27:59 PM »
quote:
quote:
I mean, the idea is not bad - but I do not think that the "extra" through the static weight shift would be worthwhile, compared to a standard HART core?
--------------------


Maybe Lane #1 was right after all.....
--------------------
quote:
I will head to my local pro shop. Right after I buy it online.

Sport Bowling is a F**king joke


302efi,

Clarification Please.

302efi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2609
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #18 on: July 17, 2008, 02:48:27 PM »
Every one laughed at Lane #1 when they said that CG does not matter, but after looking at this Hazard, sure looks like Hammer is saying that it does...

I mean is a little shift in CG distance go to make that big of an impact ?..I think Hammer says it will...
--------------------
quote:
I will head to my local pro shop. Right after I buy it online.

Sport Bowling is a F**king joke

V Spec 11

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #19 on: July 17, 2008, 02:50:12 PM »
I need more info of what the difference between this and the No Mercy will be.  This is not a pearl but are we looking at a longer ball than the No Mercy?
--------------------
Ebonite - The One
Raw Hammer - Toxic
Hammer - No Mercy
Storm - Soccer Ball

http://members.bowl.com/FindAMember/memberView.aspx?mp=474&ms=3680&s=2003-2004

lsf_21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #20 on: July 17, 2008, 03:09:00 PM »
quote:
whose gonna be the first lefty to pick one up and put a big ole honkin weight hole on it?
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason


i would if i had the money. just because it says for rightys only i wanna be a rebel.
--------------------
GO CUBS!!!!

mmcfarland300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #21 on: July 17, 2008, 03:46:55 PM »
Just got clarification from Jeff Ussery that it will be approved soon.

Moon57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 745
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #22 on: July 17, 2008, 03:50:44 PM »
I think what hammer is saying is that the cg is in an optimum spot to put very strong layouts on the ball and not have to drill a weight hole. I guess sort of like a pro cg for rightys.

Just read the previous post about getting approved. Not happy. bowlingball.com didn't list this as a pre order. If they already have the balls in stock how can they have a USBC logo if they aren't approved yet? How can Hammer even release the balls for sale if they aren't approved?
--------------------
Moon
--------------------
So many questions, so little time but I'm having fun.

Edited on 7/17/2008 3:55 PM

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #23 on: July 17, 2008, 04:00:02 PM »
The reason this batch of balls is "only for righties" is because all of the CGs are swung more than 2.5" right of the Pin-CG-MB line and all of the topweights are over 2 1/2oz.  The Hart should still be placed left of the thumb (for righties, right for lefties) for the stronger reactions desired.  Lefties would not be able to mirror the layout and get the ball within legal specs because the CG would fall in their track, needing a big weighthole to be placed on the negative side of the ball which could be flared over.

The CG has NO EFFECT in the reaction of this ball, only getting the ball within legal spec without a weighthole.  Lefties will not be able to drill this ball within spec without the CG falling way negative and needing a weighthole on the negative side.
--------------------
-DJ Marshall
...The Twelve In a Row Pro Shop.  AMF Bowie Lanes -- Bowie, MD



Edited on 7/17/2008 4:00 PM

Spider Ball Bowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4101
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #24 on: July 17, 2008, 04:05:10 PM »
quote:
whose gonna be the first lefty to pick one up and put a big ole honkin weight hole on it?
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason


haha if it were cheaper, I would bite the bullet
--------------------
Ahhh Disco Biscuits!

urbanshaft

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 814
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #25 on: July 17, 2008, 05:57:21 PM »
thats not kool at all
when is hammer gona be making a lefty only ball!!!!!

BigWillyStyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 897
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #26 on: July 18, 2008, 12:33:32 AM »
quote:
whose gonna be the first lefty to pick one up and put a big ole honkin weight hole on it?
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason



Does this mean that I could sue them when my Hazard that's drilled for my right hand rolls like crud?



quote:
thats not kool at all
when is hammer gona be making a lefty only ball!!!!!


F that!!! When is any company gonna make a "back-up only" ball?!?



Big Willy Style
--------------------
Just my $0.02 so take it for what the Foreign Exchange values it at!
"I was raised by a cup of coffee..."
***This message brought to you by the A.O.B.U.B.O.A. (Assembly Of Back-Up Bowlers Of America) which is now taking applications***  

Honorary Member of the F.O.S. (and also the best back-up bowler the Saws have ever had)!
Visionary Test Staff Member '08-'09

crusher267658

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #27 on: July 18, 2008, 12:35:56 AM »
I want one I want one I want one I want one!!!!!!!!!!! Don't have any money to put towards one though.
--------------------
For sale/trade:
15lb Columbia 300 Big Shot

urbanshaft

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 814
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #28 on: July 18, 2008, 12:40:50 AM »
jeff how can hammer be leaving us leftys out in the cold

lsf_21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #29 on: July 18, 2008, 01:41:15 AM »
quote:
jeff how can hammer be leaving us leftys out in the cold



i always knew there was a reason i wouldnt like hammer and hating on us leftys gives it to me
--------------------
GO CUBS!!!!

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: Hammer Hazard
« Reply #30 on: July 18, 2008, 03:02:35 AM »
quote:
I think what hammer is saying is that the cg is in an optimum spot to put very strong layouts on the ball and not have to drill a weight hole. I guess sort of like a pro cg for rightys.



I think the same - on some strong MB balls, where the CG is off of the pin-MB-line, you have a very good basis for a lefty or righty in order to put the MB in a position where you can keep the CG in the grip center area to avoid a balance hole. I has an XXcel that allowed such a setup.

I think that Hammer simply created this shift on purpose, either with a tilt of the core "to the left for" righties, or through the added flip block that ensures the CG shift to a certain direction. That would not be anything fancy, just using a production option that could even create blems - but in this case on purpose.

Nice idea, anyway, and good for marketing and charging a price premium
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Secrets revealed: What's a fugu?

DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany