win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Vital Energy vs Infection  (Read 1428 times)

jaywho

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Vital Energy vs Infection
« on: March 28, 2011, 05:15:12 AM »
Looking at adding a new ball to my arsenal and was hoping to get the opinions from people who have used both. Which is a better more consistent ball?

I would consider myself a power player, medium speed with medium revs playing on THS.

 

Thanks

 

 


Logged

 

EboKnight

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Vital Energy vs Infection
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2011, 09:49:36 AM »
The Vital is a little more down lane out of box than the Infection. Both very good balls tho. Ive sold a few more Infections overall. It's very easy to drill Hammer stuff right now. Both balls have alot of backend motion tho. Either one is a good pick honestly. Sales-wise Infection.

Matt Williams
Gator Pro Shop: June 04 - Present
Ebonite Staff (3 years running)
www.Ebonite.com
www.GatorBowling.com
Logged

HammerTech

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Vital Energy vs Infection
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2011, 02:49:16 PM »
I will agree, the Vital Energy is more down lane. In my opinion this makes it a little more erratic. So if you are looking for something that is a little more consistent the Infection is going to be the way to go. The Infection still gets through the front part of the lane very well just not as jumpy off the dry as the Vital Energy. Hope this helps

Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »