win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?  (Read 4639 times)

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Hi All,

Would like to get your opinions on this topic, Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?

When considering that next new purchase, which is a more important factor?

Say you have ball A, which is an excellent ball, but for only 75-100 games...then you have ball B which is an average performing bowling ball, but lasts you 300-500+ games...which one do you go with, and be honest...

also please add if you bowl strictly leagues, or if you bowl tournaments regularly in addition to league, as that could have an effect on your decision

Thanks!


--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE
3G Shoes
Buddiesproshop.com

 

Visionary 4626

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #31 on: April 30, 2008, 02:18:41 PM »
Brunswick equipment is what I use. They have great performing balls with very good longevity. I have had several Brunswick balls that had well over 500 games on them before I gave them away as they still were performing on the lanes. I do not use Ebonite or Hammer due to very limited coverstock performance. If Brunswick, Lanemasters or Visionary can put out quality products, why doesn't Ebonite. Their coverstocks soak up oil at such a rate that causes them to be boat anchors after 50 - 75 games. They might have good performing equipment, but I just can't see putting out $200 every 3 months for a new ball.

Joe Jr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2776
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #32 on: April 30, 2008, 02:31:29 PM »
I'd rather have a ball that is excellent for 100 games then a ball that is pretty good for 500 games.

I guess price plays a part in it too, if I get 75-100 games out of a great rolling ball that cost only $100, then it's pretty much done it's job.
--------------------
My Vid
Formerly Brunswick Lefty & Richard Cranium


Grayson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #33 on: April 30, 2008, 03:25:40 PM »
lazy guy I am... and simply answering the question:

the longer the ball lives and works the better... I am still learning the game though I am now making big steps toward big scores I have not much money to spend on bowling balls...

one ball per year not more. My arsenal of two balls is enough here at my local house and so my oppinion is:

it depends...

the one guy playing tournaments and making money wants A+ performance when he needs it and so needs a ball that gives him that no matter if it "dies" (I do not believe in this term! Keep your ball clan and resurface and imho 500+ games should be possible without seeing a biog loss in performance... maybe reaction... but not performance)

and then there is the other guy... a house bowler... learning the game ... or simply playing once a week for fun. He needs a ball that lasts... for him scores are not the world and often he does not want to spend big money every three month on a new ball...


AND of course there is the big mucho macho bowler always with the newest stuff and the biggest hook etc... and this guy gives a shiet about how long the ball works as he will buy a new one anyway
--------------------
Sebastian Koch
"Have fun and bowl well!" - Grayson
"Some things are made so even idiots won't fail using them.... But I ask what about the genius?" - Grayson

(\_/)
(x_x)
c(')(')

Unoffical Ballreviews.com FAQ

jls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18398
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #34 on: April 30, 2008, 03:33:27 PM »
No contest there.  If your winning money in pots,  Performance is what counts.
If your a donor, Lifespan is more important.

Had a customer in Monday who bought another Cell. His last one lasted about 45 games.  Does he care,  no,  cause he says he won boo koo bucks with the ball.

If your going to get in the pots,  you need "performance"

If you just want to feed the pots,  Lifespan it is!!!
--------------------
jls, proud watcher of womens golf