win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Particle pearls...........  (Read 3438 times)

Jesse James

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3605
Particle pearls...........
« on: December 12, 2016, 03:35:22 PM »
How many of you guys still use particle pearls? I've been using them on a medium heavy shot lately and having a ton of success!
Logged
Some days you're the bug....some days you're the windshield...that's bowling!

 

WOWZERS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 599
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2016, 04:09:09 PM »
Visionary Raven in the current line up is a Particle Pearl. Rolls very nice and is a great addition to the VBP family.
Logged

CoorZero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2016, 04:56:47 PM »
Isn't the Scandal Pearl more or less a particle pearl? If so quite a few then.  ;D
Logged

ignitebowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2016, 07:13:33 PM »
Many particle balls out there not advertised as such....and never will be.
Logged
Ignite your game, and set the lanes on fire. www.facebook.com/ignitebowling  or @ignite_bowling

Dave81644

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1662
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2016, 09:21:12 PM »
The particle ball technology in the past was glass beads or balls poured on the outer shell. Once you took a pad to it or sandpaper back then, the glass beads wore off or wore down, causing the ball to lose its reaction

the Scandal pearl is infused with Carbon fiber poured into the outer shell, the carbon fiber is very strong and its like a stud on a snow tire, once you sand down the outer shell, more carbon fiber is in the outer shell to keep the ball reaction the same as new.

http://d1p268mz1b2hyf.cloudfront.net/res/uploads/products/files/HMR_Scandal_ss_WEB.pdf

Logged

CoorZero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2016, 09:30:47 PM »
Right, but the concept is the same. The "particle" facet of the coverstock just doesn't wear down like it used to. Like ignite said particle balls will never be advertised as such again because of the bad rap from years ago but they're out there... more or less. ;)
Logged

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2016, 10:17:27 PM »
I just drilled a particle ball. AMF Incinerate. Need to see how it rolls.
Logged

Rightycomplex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1250
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2016, 05:51:29 AM »
Almost every ball now has some form of additive to it making it "particle". Whats changed is the advertising. They are no longer marketed as such just key hints in the cover name. I guess long story short, don't get wrapped up in a name.
Logged
James C. Jones
Orbdrillers Pro Shop Holiday Bowl
Chester, Va.

Hammer Regional/Amateur Staff Member

www.facebook.com/orbdrillers
Orbdrillers.com
Hammerbowling.com

Gene J Kanak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3005
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2016, 03:14:41 PM »
Another element of this is that companies learned rather quickly that the early particle loads were way, way, way more than was ideal. The newer "particle" balls use much lower concentrations, which allows the balls to avoid the basketball on a carpet grab and die reactions many of the early particle balls exhibited.
Logged

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2016, 06:51:28 PM »
A lot of things have changed in covers over the years.  Some with lots of fanfare some more quietly along the evolutionary rather than revolutionary lines.  Remember the first resin balls. They werent just tacky but downright sticky.  The amounts and types of resins have changed as have the other attributes of shell construction.   Still a urethane base, but lots of other things have evolved
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2016, 07:38:10 PM »
Quote from: Gene J Kanak on December 13, 2016, 03:14:41 PM
Another element of this is that companies learned rather quickly that the early particle loads were way, way, way more than was ideal. The newer "particle" balls use much lower concentrations, which allows the balls to avoid the basketball on a carpet grab and die reactions many of the early particle balls exhibited.

Gene,

You seem to forget balls like the Brunswick Riot Zone and many Brunswick-based balls with the 2.0 version of their particle balls. (The Lane #1 Pro Purple used this same coverstock with equally great results.) These balls were meant for light to medium-light oil patterns. They were anything but early. They were MAGNIFICENT for slow speed bowlers like myself. I had one Riot Zone that had to have had over a 1,000 games on it and it never needed de-oiling. It never died. I rue the day I sold it; I wish I never had. There was never a ball like it.

http://www.bowlwithbrunswick.com/downloads/info-sheets/Riot_Zone_Purple_Pearl.pdf
« Last Edit: December 13, 2016, 07:46:48 PM by charlest »
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Walking E

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2101
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2016, 12:17:29 AM »
I just picked up my second Visionary Raven particle pearl. This ball rolls great - it has a very nice hook shape downlane and rarely misses the spot due the extra grip from the particles.
Logged

tloy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 950
  • Roto Grip-Own It and Bowl up a Storm
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2016, 05:57:22 AM »
Yes the Visionary is closer to the older Particle Pearls of old. I just wish the RG (around 2.48) was lower and Diff was Higher (.056 or Better)....  ;)
Logged

Gene J Kanak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3005
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2016, 07:08:59 AM »
Quote from: charlest on December 13, 2016, 07:38:10 PM
Quote from: Gene J Kanak on December 13, 2016, 03:14:41 PM
Another element of this is that companies learned rather quickly that the early particle loads were way, way, way more than was ideal. The newer "particle" balls use much lower concentrations, which allows the balls to avoid the basketball on a carpet grab and die reactions many of the early particle balls exhibited.

Gene,

You seem to forget balls like the Brunswick Riot Zone and many Brunswick-based balls with the 2.0 version of their particle balls. (The Lane #1 Pro Purple used this same coverstock with equally great results.) These balls were meant for light to medium-light oil patterns. They were anything but early. They were MAGNIFICENT for slow speed bowlers like myself. I had one Riot Zone that had to have had over a 1,000 games on it and it never needed de-oiling. It never died. I rue the day I sold it; I wish I never had. There was never a ball like it.

http://www.bowlwithbrunswick.com/downloads/info-sheets/Riot_Zone_Purple_Pearl.pdf

True enough, Charlest. I was speaking more in general terms. There were definitely a lot of very good particle balls out there (and I'm sure there still are!). Sadly, a lot of bowlers only focused upon and remembered the bad ones, and that's a big reason why you don't see/hear many companies openly talking about using particle anymore.
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Particle pearls...........
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2016, 09:38:24 AM »
Gene,

Agree 110%. I think ignorance is the main reason why particle balls got the bad reputation. They didn't know when to use them or how to take care of them. Their care is/was slightly the fault of the manufacturers; I think they either never pushed the kind of care those balls needed (actually no more than any ball needs today, but people are better educated now, 15-20 years later); or they didn't know themselves how much care (oil removal and surface maintenance) was required for particles.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: [1]
« previous next »