win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee Adopts New Specification  (Read 4109 times)

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Found this on the USBC Website...not sure if a topic was started on this website or not...


USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee Adopts New Specification
 
8/24/2009

USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee adopts new bowling ball specification as part of continuing effort to reestablish bowling's credibility.

The USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee has adopted a new specification for all bowling balls approved for competition on or after July 1, 2010. The new specification will raise the allowable lower-limit radius of gyration (RG) measurement to 2.460 inches up from 2.430 inches.

Raising the lower-limit RG specification will delay and weaken overall ball motion, thereby decreasing the amount of inherent aggressiveness bowling ball manufacturers can infuse into their bowling ball product lines.

This specification change, and others that have been recently adopted, which include Surface Roughness - Ra, lane surface hardness and lane conditioner viscosity, is aimed at reestablishing player skill as an equally if not more important factor than technology in determining bowling ball motion.

"Our sport incorporates a multitude of variables relating from the ball to the bowler to the lane and beyond. This new RG specification should be supported by league and tournament players alike because it is another step that USBC is taking to bring results back in line with player performance," USBC Technical Director Steve Kloempken said." We will continue addressing this issue and investigating possible specification changes until we get back to the point where player skill is as important as, if not more important than, technology in determining success on the lanes."

The realization that a new lower-limit RG specification was needed came about after USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications team members conducted exhaustive analysis of the Ball Motion Study, a two-year, joint research venture conducted by USBC in cooperation with bowling ball manufacturers.

The study, which can be read in its entirety on USBC's bowl.com Web site, examined and ranked how 18 different variables affect bowling ball motion. The study was completed in March 2008. Since that time, the USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee has evaluated the results and used the findings to establish and/or modify specifications limiting a bowling ball's Surface Roughness - Ra and, now, lower-limit RG standard.

All bowling balls approved before the deadline will be grandfathered in under the current RG specifications, making them legal for future USBC-certified competition. The specification change will only apply to balls approved on or after July 1, 2010.

"One of the important things to consider is how research and this new specification benefits our members," Kloempken said. "Between 2005 and 2008, we gathered critical knowledge and data from the Ball Motion Study. Using that data to modify current specifications like this is critical to educate our members and uphold the credibility of the sport. It is all done in an ongoing effort to balance player skill and technology, and you as a USBC member are a part of it."

For more information on this and other technical issues, visit the Equipment Specifications and Certifications area of bowl.com.

--------------------
Britton
Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com
Multi Media Consultant
Storm Products, Inc.
www.stormbowling.com
www.rotogrip.com

 

VIXIV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
The Playmaker and Pin Slasher are the only 2 I can think of with minimum RG's lower than 2.46

RyanRPS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 862
quote:
quote:
I thought their was something with the Core also. But my source could also be flawed.



The original SD-73's differential was legal at the time it was released, but the differential was greater than was allowed under the last equipment rules change.  Roto-Grip was allowed to reproduce the SD-73 as the SD-73 Classic under the grandfather clause.


I may be wrong, but I dont think thats quite correct..

The grandfather clause allows you to use old balls that wouldnt be legal if produced today..

I believe the SD73 Classic was just approved by USBC before the rule about 0.06 diff came in, then RG released the ball a little after the rule had changed..

Ryan

BrianCRX90

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
quote:
quote:
They should create patterns that don't play so ridiculously easy and go that route then change the restrictions on the balls.


yup many have said just that over and over again but they will never go after the people who put the shots out.

its the idea that recreational bowlers are where the money is (make the scores high so people are happy and return to bowl) but IMO it is whats killing the sport.





How about considering changing the pins themselves? Start changing the RG on the pins insted of bowling balls.

leftyinsnellville

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2345
quote:
quote:
quote:
I thought their was something with the Core also. But my source could also be flawed.



The original SD-73's differential was legal at the time it was released, but the differential was greater than was allowed under the last equipment rules change.  Roto-Grip was allowed to reproduce the SD-73 as the SD-73 Classic under the grandfather clause.


I may be wrong, but I dont think thats quite correct..

The grandfather clause allows you to use old balls that wouldnt be legal if produced today..

I believe the SD73 Classic was just approved by USBC before the rule about 0.06 diff came in, then RG released the ball a little after the rule had changed..

Ryan


Maybe.  This is what the web site said.  

The Low RG (2.50), High Differential (.073) weight block is illegal by today's USBC standards, but since it was approved prior to the rule change it is perfectly legal for all USBC and PBA Regional competition.

Because they said "today's USBC standards", I assumed the ball was manufactured after the rule was put into place.  As the core is the same as the SD-73 core, I also assumed that the core approval they spoke of was the prior core...my mistake (if I'm wrong.)


Edited on 8/27/2009 5:10 PM