win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee Adopts New Specification  (Read 4108 times)

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Found this on the USBC Website...not sure if a topic was started on this website or not...


USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee Adopts New Specification
 
8/24/2009

USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee adopts new bowling ball specification as part of continuing effort to reestablish bowling's credibility.

The USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee has adopted a new specification for all bowling balls approved for competition on or after July 1, 2010. The new specification will raise the allowable lower-limit radius of gyration (RG) measurement to 2.460 inches up from 2.430 inches.

Raising the lower-limit RG specification will delay and weaken overall ball motion, thereby decreasing the amount of inherent aggressiveness bowling ball manufacturers can infuse into their bowling ball product lines.

This specification change, and others that have been recently adopted, which include Surface Roughness - Ra, lane surface hardness and lane conditioner viscosity, is aimed at reestablishing player skill as an equally if not more important factor than technology in determining bowling ball motion.

"Our sport incorporates a multitude of variables relating from the ball to the bowler to the lane and beyond. This new RG specification should be supported by league and tournament players alike because it is another step that USBC is taking to bring results back in line with player performance," USBC Technical Director Steve Kloempken said." We will continue addressing this issue and investigating possible specification changes until we get back to the point where player skill is as important as, if not more important than, technology in determining success on the lanes."

The realization that a new lower-limit RG specification was needed came about after USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications team members conducted exhaustive analysis of the Ball Motion Study, a two-year, joint research venture conducted by USBC in cooperation with bowling ball manufacturers.

The study, which can be read in its entirety on USBC's bowl.com Web site, examined and ranked how 18 different variables affect bowling ball motion. The study was completed in March 2008. Since that time, the USBC Equipment Specifications and Certifications Committee has evaluated the results and used the findings to establish and/or modify specifications limiting a bowling ball's Surface Roughness - Ra and, now, lower-limit RG standard.

All bowling balls approved before the deadline will be grandfathered in under the current RG specifications, making them legal for future USBC-certified competition. The specification change will only apply to balls approved on or after July 1, 2010.

"One of the important things to consider is how research and this new specification benefits our members," Kloempken said. "Between 2005 and 2008, we gathered critical knowledge and data from the Ball Motion Study. Using that data to modify current specifications like this is critical to educate our members and uphold the credibility of the sport. It is all done in an ongoing effort to balance player skill and technology, and you as a USBC member are a part of it."

For more information on this and other technical issues, visit the Equipment Specifications and Certifications area of bowl.com.

--------------------
Britton
Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com
Multi Media Consultant
Storm Products, Inc.
www.stormbowling.com
www.rotogrip.com

 

leftyinsnellville

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2345
What a bunch of horsesh!t...

Minor tweaking isn't going to do anything except increase the demand for balls approved and manufactured before July 2010, and encourage ball manufacturers to reproduce balls that were previously approved (see Roto-Grip's SD-73 Classic).

It really won't make a difference in the long run.  I'm confident that the slight change will be more than compensated for with new technology, probably before the changes even come into effect.

Maine Man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2116
Interesting read.  One of the MANY steps that need to be taken to bring integrity back to the game of bowling.
--------------------
James Goulding
Moores Pro Shop

Bowler 2 Bowler Blog: http://bowler2bowler.wordpress.com
State Site: http://www.msusbc-maine.org
Local Link: www.lausbca.org

Chat: www.bowlingchat.net
James Goulding
Bowler Builders Pro Shops
Radical Staff
F.D.D.S. Tournament Director

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
This is a step in the right dierection, steps need to be taken to bring the SPORT back to what it was in its heyday.

Lefty what if they stop allowing them to reproduce older gear? Also i beleive the SD-73 Classic came out just before the regs changed. The Original SD-73 was banned for not being compilent with the rules. The Classic has a Similiar to the VBP IMMORTALS, none can be produced anymore.
--------------------
''Don't you Forget their is a price
you can pay.
Cause I am the Game!
And I wanna Play!''

-MotorHead Song ''THE GAME''-


MainzerPower
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
quote:
This is a step in the right dierection, steps need to be taken to bring the SPORT back to what it was in its heyday.

Lefty what if they stop allowing them to reproduce older gear? Also i beleive the SD-73 Classic came out just before the regs changed. The Original SD-73 was banned for not being compilent with the rules. The Classic has a Similiar to the VBP IMMORTALS, none can be produced anymore.




The only reason the SD-73 was banned was it's coverstock was too soft according to the specs at the time.  I believe it was only banned at the PBA level as well.

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
I thought their was something with the Core also. But my source could also be flawed.
--------------------
''Don't you Forget their is a price
you can pay.
Cause I am the Game!
And I wanna Play!''

-MotorHead Song ''THE GAME''-


MainzerPower
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

AdrianS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1122
"Ok lets change the ball specs just a little so the ball companies dont get annoyed" Yup we all know how this game works
--------------------
Time for some REAL bowling!!!
Time for some REAL bowling!!!

leftyinsnellville

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2345
quote:
I thought their was something with the Core also. But my source could also be flawed.



The original SD-73's differential was legal at the time it was released, but the differential was greater than was allowed under the last equipment rules change.  Roto-Grip was allowed to reproduce the SD-73 as the SD-73 Classic under the grandfather clause.

Here's a link to the original SD-73:  http://www.rotogrip.com/products/balls/archive-ball.asp?ballid=55

Here's a link to the SD-73 Classic:
http://www.rotogrip.com/products/balls/archive-ball.asp?ballid=6
--------------------
A flute with no holes is not a flute, and a donut with no hole is a danish.

http://averagebolwersballreviews.com/

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Cool thanks!
--------------------
''Don't you Forget their is a price
you can pay.
Cause I am the Game!
And I wanna Play!''

-MotorHead Song ''THE GAME''-


MainzerPower
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

1MechEng

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Bowling Nerd Herd member
How many current (read: newer) bowling balls have an Rg of less than 2.46 right now in a standard 15# weight? I believe that most low Rg balls are in the 2.47-2.50 range.

The only balls that come to mind right now that would not be approved under the new spec. (without doing an exhaustive search) are the PlayMaker and PinSmasher from Ebonite, and the Hot Sauce from Hammer, which are 2.44 or 2.45.

It looks like this new spec. will not affect current equipment that much, and I'm not really sure that it will affect many pieces currently in R&D at the major companies, either.

Just my $0.02 worth.
--------------------
======================
Dan
======================
Engineering * Bowling = a fun and practical application of rotational kinematics.

Bowling Nerd Herd (TM) Member
Dan

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
quote:
How many current (read: newer) bowling balls have an Rg of less than 2.46 right now in a standard 15# weight? I believe that most low Rg balls are in the 2.47-2.50 range.

The only balls that come to mind right now that would not be approved under the new spec. (without doing an exhaustive search) are the PlayMaker and PinSmasher from Ebonite, and the Hot Sauce from Hammer, which are 2.44 or 2.45.

It looks like this new spec. will not affect current equipment that much, and I'm not really sure that it will affect many pieces currently in R&D at the major companies, either.

Just my $0.02 worth.
--------------------
======================
Dan
======================
Engineering * Bowling = a fun and practical application of rotational kinematics.

Bowling Nerd Herd (TM) Member
From what I understand after reading this article, it's the lower RG, not the average RG, that they're changing.  If so, that'll mean a lot more balls wouldn't fit the new criteria.  The Virtual Gravity, for example, has a 2.480 average RG, but an RG differential of .048 (on the 15 pound version of the ball), which would mean the lower RG would fall under the new 2.460 spect, for example.  Can anyone verify I'm understanding that right?

SleepOnIce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 704
Yay more skid/flip balls.
--------------------
BLARGH
Rob Stone Supporters of America!

No Revs00300

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 484
I don't realy agree with this, I think there are other things they could do instead of makeing limits on bowling balls. I don't know if I missed this, but do they like grandfater older equipment into this where as if you have an older ball that is outside the new rg. requirment will people still be able to use those balls? If not that is kinda discrimination in my opinion. Not everyone might have the extra money layin around to get new equipment.

No Revs00300

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 484
They should create patterns that don't play so ridiculously easy and go that route then change the restrictions on the balls.

icewall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 906
quote:
They should create patterns that don't play so ridiculously easy and go that route then change the restrictions on the balls.


yup many have said just that over and over again but they will never go after the people who put the shots out.

its the idea that recreational bowlers are where the money is (make the scores high so people are happy and return to bowl) but IMO it is whats killing the sport.
--------------------
tournament average: 219

tweener
medium revs
medium speed
specs and ball layouts in profile

currently throwing
Visionary (O.P. / O. SS. / Glad S.)
Rotogrip (rogue cell)
lanemasters (black pearl)