Author Topic: which ball is better for medium to dry lanes (Read 734 times)

BrunswickBowler123 · « **on:** April 05, 2007, 12:18:33 PM »

the toxic or the vapor zone

Strider · « **Reply #1 on:** April 05, 2007, 09:06:18 PM »

Both are very much medium oil balls. I wouldn't use either on anything less unless you drilled them very weakly and polished the daylights out of them. Based on what I've seen, if I had to flip a coin, the Toxic is a tad weaker.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Special thanks to Dynothane, Visionary, and Lane#1 for donations to the Ballreviews Get Together.

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive

c-hop · « **Reply #2 on:** April 05, 2007, 09:40:02 PM »

i would not use either on med dry unless u have a lower rev rate. If you like hammer Blue Vibe or Raw Hammer Doom is good for med dry. If you want to go with Brunswick i would say a Red Zone or Smokin Inferno
--------------------
Chris

« **Reply #3 on:** April 05, 2007, 11:31:10 PM »

Smokin' Inferno gets my vote, too. It's a "monster" on drier lanes.
--------------------
notclay

Edited on 4/5/2007 11:31 PM

DerHornen · « **Reply #4 on:** April 06, 2007, 08:20:28 AM »

quote:
i would not use either on med dry unless u have a lower rev rate. If you like hammer Blue Vibe or Raw Hammer Doom is good for med dry. If you want to go with Brunswick i would say a Red Zone or Smokin Inferno
--------------------
Chris

I think the Red Zone is too strong for anything less than medium, but I'm mainly basing that off my experience with the Strike Zone. I think anytime the word "dry" enters into it a pearl ball comes to mind for most people.

Author Topic: which ball is better for medium to dry lanes (Read 734 times)

BrunswickBowler123

which ball is better for medium to dry lanes

Strider

Re: which ball is better for medium to dry lanes

c-hop

Re: which ball is better for medium to dry lanes

Re: which ball is better for medium to dry lanes

DerHornen

Re: which ball is better for medium to dry lanes