win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Which Company? What Tendencies?  (Read 468 times)

Mike E

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
Which Company? What Tendencies?
« on: August 03, 2005, 11:36:30 AM »
In your experiences are some ball companies known to have certain reactions? For example: Roto Grip-Backend
             Brunswick-Early Roll
What are your experiences with this? Does one company seem to go longer?

                               Thanks,
                               Mike E
--------------------
Did you know that you can't see pigs in a windstorm?

 

azus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1867
Re: Which Company? What Tendencies?
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2005, 07:38:13 PM »
Storms balls is more flippy than arcing

spanky

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
Re: Which Company? What Tendencies?
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2005, 07:47:13 PM »
yes and know. Storm tends to use weight blocks which favor a skid/flip reaction, but it's in the layout. As for Brunswick, early roll is in the layout. I don't know that I would say that of Big B's (or any manufacture's)equipment. Any equipment can be layed out for early roll, and Brunswick balls can be layed out for length and backend, too. Each ball across the spectrum has core and cover combinations that are designed to react a certain way on a given condition with an appropriate layout. Change the layout, tweak the cover, or play it on an "unintended" condition and you will get totally different reactionds.