win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Surface change/effects of balls in the 90's vs today  (Read 1867 times)

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Surface change/effects of balls in the 90's vs today
« on: November 29, 2015, 07:04:26 PM »
I was wondering to the bowling Guru's on here about this question : obviously the balls of at least 15 years has a drastic effect on ball reaction/motion, but with some of my older balls from the 90's that were designed for mostly durability, that when I have changes the surface on them, they give such UNUSUAL BALL MOTIONS AND REACTIONS: And I wonder why that is.

To me it acts like nib balls of today that once you adjust the surface, it's gone, only difference is that again it appeared that balls back then had very similar finishes,  not focused on a particular finish,

To make a long story short, I have just picked up a few oldies,  and they react good, but are obviously worn out (the coverstocks)  and was open to changing the surface, but afraid to lose the initial reaction, what did I do?  And why is this?  Thanks for any feedback.

 

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Surface change/effects of balls in the 90's vs today
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2015, 07:25:48 PM »
No matter the finish, every ball surface starts changing when it is thrown down the lane. Imagine the lane as a piece of sand paper. Some lanes are smoother, some are a bit rougher.

As you throw the ball down the lane over the series of just a few games the surface of the ball will begin to change and get closer to the surface of the lane. There are a few vids available that show this change. 


no matter what era the ball is from this will happen. Any ball from then or now can handle surface changes just fine. You may need to play with the, to see what works best for you.

http://www.ballreviews.com/coverstock-preparation/awesome-video-showing-how-much-a-ball-changes-in-three-games-t289256.0.html
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

JJKinGA

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Surface change/effects of balls in the 90's vs today
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2015, 10:09:33 AM »
It is not just the lane - it is the ball return also.  All the belts, rollers and fabrics that collect, move, accelerate and then slow the ball do the sanding/polishing.  Otherwise the change would only be in the track of the ball.  The measurements show changes everywhere.  I suspect that the ball return is the major actor in changing the surface of the ball.

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: Surface change/effects of balls in the 90's vs today
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2015, 02:32:32 PM »
By the mid 90's most urethane balls were being enhanced with resins.  Typically the surface prep is less extreme on resin equipment.  For example many people used urethane balls at 400 grit.  Today you don't see people going that low too much because the resins create enough friction off the dry that such aggressive surface prep is not necessary.  On the down side, oil saturation impacts resins more extremely than it did on pure urethane making it harder to regain box condition reaction 

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: Surface change/effects of balls in the 90's vs today
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2015, 02:46:25 PM »
Thanks avabob, this is exactly what I thought it was the way you explained it, much appreciated.