win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Sahara or H2O?  (Read 994 times)

adman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Sahara or H2O?
« on: July 19, 2005, 04:07:23 AM »
I'm not sure if anyone has any experience with both of these balls, but I currently have a Lane#1 H20 and was wondering if the Sahara has a weaker or stronger coverstock than the H20. I normally stick with throwing Lane#1, Morich and Track balls but just wanted to know if I was missing out on anything in the Sahara.
I know they are both pretty much for drier lane conditions or atleast drier backends, but I just wanted to know which one could handle a little oil or carrydown better.

Thanks for your input.
Logged

 

Traumatize

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 810
Re: Sahara or H2O?
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2005, 12:37:33 PM »
Yes the Sahara would be weaker.  It has the N'Control powerboost cover found on the Punisher, and the H2O has a pk18 and activator hybrid cover.
--------------------
*Erie Community College bowling*

Buffalo bowlers are the best all around in the country.

MoRich 4ever!!!!  If you don't have one, try one.  You won't be disappointed!!!
Logged

adman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Sahara or H2O?
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2005, 12:42:02 PM »
Ahh, thanks. Your right. PK18 is stronger, but which core do you prefer?

Just curious. I love both Lane#1 and Morich cores, just wondering what everyone else thought.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »