I had the Fantasy X reactive. That ball went real long on fresh with clean backends and then snapped late when it hit dry. I left some very powerful looking ten pins. On drier it hooked too early. On carrydown, plastic hooked more. That ball was really oil sensitive. I had a lot of over under problems with it. I played with the cover. I drilled out the side weight. I never could get really good breakpoint control with it. It was a frustrating experience because on those rare occasions I could line up with a proper breakpoint, the Fantasy X Reactive put all ten pins in the pit as a unit. Fun to watch! It was also a Christmas gift, so I really wanted it to work. Maybe the solid particle version would roll more even. I wish now I had gotten that one and polished it.
Oh well.
--------------------

Why does everyone laugh when I bowl?

louie

King Pin, you might want to look into the older AZO equipment and not this stuff Lanemasters goes by.  I heard the Answer left a lot of questions as to whether or not it was truly a ball or a mere 16 pound paper weight.

I know AZO manufactures their equipment but I prefer AZO's own stuff against what Lanemaster's coming up with.

You can't go wrong with the Drastic series, or even the Fires if you can find them.  I owned all four of them and they worked well on a wide variety of conditions.  All are very hard hitting and nice carrying equipment.
--------------------
Always Aggie Dun

Pin_Krusher IS a serious threat to modern day bowling wood as we know it today.