win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Reax 2 video (V2)  (Read 4208 times)

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Reax 2 video (V2)
« on: November 15, 2013, 08:20:52 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tczcg883iA8&feature=youtu.be



This ball at box finish is super clean through the heads. SUPER clean. Had to adjust the surface to 1000 siaair to be able to use the ball and wow it is great. Still super clean, but much more usable for me.

Glad I got this ball.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2013, 06:19:21 AM by kidlost2000 »
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

 

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2013, 09:47:40 PM »
I like everything I have seen so far from this ball!
Logged
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???

batbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2013, 02:24:20 PM »
Is that at Millennium Bowl Maumelle, Arkansas? Nice video Kid!
Logged
Bruce Campbell
Coaches aren't born, they are made!
USBC Silver Certified Coach
          
www.rotogrip.com
www.stormbowling.com
www.radicalbowling.com
www.damngoodbowling.com

Changing bowling, one bowler at a time!

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2013, 03:08:06 PM »
yes, and thanks
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2013, 03:15:16 PM »
It's worth noting that the core you showed in the video is incorrect...  The Reax 2.0 uses a modified version of the core used in the Yetis... 
Logged

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2013, 03:40:40 PM »
Will change later
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Brandon Riley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1156
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2013, 04:09:08 PM »
Reax2 looks awesome in your hands kid!
I am really impressed at how clean it is for an asym!
Logged
Brandon Riley
Brunswick Regional Staff

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2013, 04:13:40 PM »
Thanks. Thats at 1000 sanded. I thought box finish was 2000 sanded and I couldn't figure out how I was missing everything 10 boards to the right lol. Super clean is an understatement. Even at 1000 its super clean
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Brandon Riley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1156
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2013, 04:48:56 PM »
I don't know if it was just an odd ball but the reax2 we got for the shop is definitely glossy looking. Maybe royal compound is smoother than rough buff?
Logged
Brandon Riley
Brunswick Regional Staff

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2013, 05:06:48 PM »
Its the color. The lighter blue especially after being drilled didn't look polished to me. Later on in better lighting, especially after throwing the ball, it was a duhhh moment on my part.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Reax 2 video (V2)
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2013, 05:38:08 PM »
Quote from: Brandon Riley on November 16, 2013, 04:48:56 PM
I don't know if it was just an odd ball but the reax2 we got for the shop is definitely glossy looking. Maybe royal compound is smoother than rough buff?

I wonder if it is similar to what they used on equipment when the Danger Zone was the ball to have... back when the finish was "double buffed"

Those weren't dull, but they weren't a high gloss polish either...
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »