Author Topic: Cell Solid vs. Virtual Gravity (Read 1389 times)

BruceKaratz · « **on:** March 16, 2011, 02:37:19 AM »

What is the difference between these balls? I apologize for such a vague question, but I'm looking for a heavy oil ball. I'm currently throwing a Second Dimension (1000 abralon), Hyroad (oob), and Reign (2000 abralon).

vkowalski1970 · « **Reply #1 on:** March 16, 2011, 01:41:32 PM »

I had both balls....they were both drilled identical. Had the cell first and then replaced with VG. IMHO, I thought the VG was a better ball. It was harder off the break and and was more versatile for me. They both were great balls, dont get me wrong....The VG was just better.

I replaced my VG with a Track 715T and I am very happy with it. Not quite as hard off the break as the VG, but harder than the Cell. I feel the 715T takes surface changes better than both the Cell and VG....

Depends on what kind of motion you are looking for....

My Current Arsenal:

715T................... 65x4.4x30 1000AB

505T................... 65x4.5x30 2000AB

Bank Pearl...........60x5x40 1500 polished

Dark Star.............70x3.5x40 1500 polished

Red Backlash.......80x3x40 2000 polished

LuckyLefty · « **Reply #2 on:** March 17, 2011, 03:35:24 AM »

Interesting...in part I agree.

My son a power two hander who liked his VG when new just picked up a 715T. So far we are impressed.

It looks just as described here by the last poster....smoother and more readable than the VG but almost as angular and more angular than the Cell.

A wonderful combination.

No knock on storm as I could see myself with a Nano.

I'm going to wait and bit and hear about durability first.

Regards,

Luckylefty

It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

Author Topic: Cell Solid vs. Virtual Gravity (Read 1389 times)

BruceKaratz

Cell Solid vs. Virtual Gravity

vkowalski1970

Re: Cell Solid vs. Virtual Gravity

LuckyLefty

Re: Cell Solid vs. Virtual Gravity