Author Topic: Magic Touch vs. Virtual Energy (Read 799 times)

thumper · « **on:** September 18, 2009, 02:31:53 AM »

Are there any differences in reaction between these two? Is it worth it to have one of each? Just curious.

icewall · « **Reply #1 on:** September 18, 2009, 11:01:37 AM »

I think they could compliment each other.

the virtual energy being the stronger ball would cover medium to medium heavy
and the magic touch is a bit weaker and would cover a little less oil medium to medium light.

virtual energy and magic touch both have a pronounced backend but the difference is in how soon they grab the lane. the virtual energy will grab the lane much sooner then the magic touch.

this makes sense as the magic touch was made to compliment the magic which is around the strength of the virtual energy only it comes dull/matte
--------------------
tournament average: 219

tweener
medium revs
medium speed
specs and ball layouts in profile

currently throwing
Visionary (O.P. / O. SS. / Glad S.)
Rotogrip (rogue cell)
lanemasters (black pearl)

themachine300 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 18, 2009, 11:17:42 AM »

I agree, the magic touch is basically ebonite's version of the hyroad. It might have a touch more midlane than the hyroad but reacts very similar. Both are weaker than the energy
--------------------
www.bowlingsolutions.com

Bowl to win!!!

Move left, hook it more.....

Tommy Jones and Kenny Simard are Gamecock fans...are you???

Edited on 9/18/2009 11:18 AM

Author Topic: Magic Touch vs. Virtual Energy (Read 799 times)

thumper

Magic Touch vs. Virtual Energy

icewall

Re: Magic Touch vs. Virtual Energy

themachine300

Re: Magic Touch vs. Virtual Energy