win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Crunch vs Revmaster  (Read 1281 times)

cooksey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Crunch vs Revmaster
« on: October 30, 2003, 12:33:36 AM »
Hello All, I have a crunch already and was considering a revmaster. How do these two balls compare. Does anyone own both? If so what are the major differences in them that you see. Thanks for the help.

Thanks, cooksey
--------------------
" Focus the next shot is critical"
Logged
" Focus the next shot is critical"

AIM:johncooksey24

 

Airplay

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93
Re: Crunch vs Revmaster
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2003, 04:45:42 PM »
My 2 cents.
I disagree with Leftside. It may suck to him, but it works very well for me. It is a ball with a strong core. The ball has a strong arcing reaction on the lanes. I drilled mine with the pin under ring finger and cg directly below. Very tame drilling. Still a strong ball, good for medium conditions. Revs up strong like the name suggests. Has no trouble getting through the heads. I love the ball. Not every ball suits every owner. If you need a strong arcing ball for medium conditions this is a good choice. Good bang for the buck. I got mine for a good price on ebay.
--------------------
Bowl to win Baby
Logged

Mr Track

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
Re: Crunch vs Revmaster
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2003, 11:46:53 AM »
revmaster is not the ball for me!

i would truely recommend this ball for strokers and down&in shooters....

when i had this ball, i was a stroker...then i became a tweener with more angle/revs/and boards....the ball died out on me in the backends but went through the heads great with awesome midlane roll....then the ball just flattened out in the backends...then again, it could've been the drilling, but i drilled my crunch almost similar with a lower pin placement...not even close! my crunch just keeps going and going and going!

the revmaster has a great hit, but if your gonna drill it for mid-lane roll, then you better be a stroker ready for a good reaction!

that's my opinion.....i sold my revmaster to a stroker
--------------------
Tweeners do it best!
Logged

tenpinspro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4161
Re: Crunch vs Revmaster
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2003, 07:08:14 AM »
There is quite a difference between the Crunch and RevMaster.  The Crunch should typically get down the lane quite a bit before ir finishes while the RevMaster stands up pretty quick in the midlane(very low RG).  This is why you're getting feedback on burnout or being flat in the backend on the RevMaster.  If you like the Crunch but want something just a little more, I'd recommend the new Crunch Time.  It does exactly as promised, clears the heads smoothly and then picks up to create a strong arcing backend.  If you want something stronger then that, I'd look to the Thrash or Triple Threat for a little more particle reaction in oil vs resin.  Hope this was helpful...

Rick Leong
Track Pro Shop Staff
Logged
Rick Leong - Ten Pins Pro Shop
Co-Founder - Tag Team Coaching
"El" Presidente of the Legion

Porkchop

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
Re: Crunch vs Revmaster
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2003, 04:19:13 PM »
Not too sure about the Crunch, but I kinda like my Revmaster.  It goes plenty long and turns left sharp.  It will be a great ball for me once I drill a deeper hole in the side!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »