win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Xception Drilling  (Read 1930 times)

O-Zone

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Xception Drilling
« on: December 14, 2004, 03:17:41 PM »
A little background first-

I'm looking for a ball to use on the longer PBA patterns.  I have no intention of using this during my leagues or on the shorter patterns.  If I threw the Xception once a month and had success with it, I'd be totally happy.

I don't have a million revs, so when I play farther left on the longer PBA patterns (C and B in particular), I have a tough time matching up well.  I have had some success on A and D, and I generally bowl well on E.

When bowling on the longer patterns, I've found that particle pearls or sanded reactive pearls work the best for me.  Solid reactives and particles tend to hook too early and don't hit hard (Rock-On, V2 Strong were failures...the original Danger Zone has been decent, but not great).  I drilled a Depth Charge but the carry with that wasn't great (Storm stuff in particular, I think...they just seem "soft")....tried a Crunch Time (Pin next to ring, CG right of center on midline about 2", extra hole near my PAP), but that works much better on broken-down conditions for me.  The best results I've had is with a sanded V2 Pearl (Pin under ring 1", CG out 3" and 1/2" above midline, large hole near my PAP, maybe 1" left...I can't remember at the moment), but that only works well for a couple of games.

So-  I'd like to try an Xception, probably dulled down to 1000 or so.  I have a ball in our pro shop with a 3" pin, CG 1" right of a line drawn from Pin to MB.  Do you guys have any advice on how I should drill this up?

Thanks in advance!

--------------------
Jeff Voght
PBA Eastern Region Member

 

The great one

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2004, 12:01:19 AM »
if you're thinking of dulling an xecption, why not just drill a rule? However, if you are intent on drilling an xcetpion, i would put the pin next to the ring finger, and the mass bias by the thumb..if you were looking at a track drillsheet, it would be pin between #2 and 3, and mass bias #2. I have 2 xceptions, and one drilled like this starts up alot sooner, with alot more overall hook than the other (pin on bridge, mass bias out farther, between positions 2 and 3. That one gets down the lane easier, farther, with a snapper move on the backend. hope this helps.
--------------------
www.bowlersedgeproshop.com

tenpinspro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4161
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2004, 06:22:43 AM »
Hey Jeff,

If you get decent reaction from your DZ, then the Xception or maybe even a FAZ will fit what you're looking for.

On the Xception which is stronger than the DZ, I'd suggest a 4.5-5 pin and 4.25-4.5 mass bias with the pin about 3-3.25 above midline.  This layout should give you pretty good length with a strong backend to help turn the corner where the DZ can't.

On the FAZ which I'd say is similar to your DZ but has a stronger backend by nature, you can keep the same layout as your DZ and the ball should do the rest.  (Layouts are based on your layout and reaction from your CT)

I personally would go with the Xception just to have a little more strength as you mentioned that you don't have a ton of revs.  If you can get back to us with your pap info, I can be a little more accurate plus I'm sure our "Crew" here will be glad to help out.  Thanks...
--------------------
Rick Leong
Ten Pins Pro Shop
Track Intl. - Amateur/Pro Shop Staff  
Vise Inserts Staff
Rick Leong - Ten Pins Pro Shop
Co-Founder - Tag Team Coaching
"El" Presidente of the Legion

O-Zone

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2004, 05:53:16 PM »
The great one-

I'm hesitant to drill a Rule because of the strength of the coverstock.  I'm guessing that the Xception's pearlized GOO-LS slightly dulled will be more controllable and a little less early hook than the Rule's solid GOO polished.

I like the sounds of your first suggested drilling.  The second one would probably be too flippy and/or have too much length for the longer patterns.

Rick-

I was hoping you would be one of the ones to reply!  I've been reading the forums on this site for several months and you, along with several others, ("The Crew"), seem very knowledgeable...certainly moreso than myself!

My PAP is nearly 6", very little up (maybe 1/8").  I ordered another Xception for our pro shop today, asking for a longer pin-CG distance.  I'll let you know if I receive anything longer than the 3" Xception we have right now.  My span is  4.75" to my middle finger, 4.87" to my ring finger.  It sounds like you're suggesting I put the pin right of the center of my ring finger...where would you put the MB?

In regards to the FAZ/DZ.....my DZ has a 3.25" pin, pin under ring, CG .5" right of midline and about .5" under midline.  It gets through the heads well on the longer patterns, nice strong arc at the breakpoint, but doesn't carry well...lots of 10's.  It doesn't really roll out....probably just not enough angle and continuation.

I've heard good things about the FAZ.  I really like my CT on drier backends; the carry is excellent.  The place I bowl my leagues at usually has a ton of carrydown, so I don't use it there.  I might try the FAZ down the road.

Once again, thanks for your replies and any further input I receive will be appreciated!
--------------------
Jeff Voght
PBA Eastern Region Member

C-G ProShop-Carl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5825
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2004, 09:17:58 PM »
Jeff,

I agree that the Xception is probably the way to go. Even dulled up and drilled for early roll it tends to get down the lane decently and retain a strong backend reaction. This should help give you the extra carry you are looking for when you are leaving 10s with some other equipment.

What I get out of my Xception (pin leverage and MB on VAL) is a ball that gets down the lane further with more of an angular breakpoint than what I get out of of Rule drilled for length. This is a control ball for me, but with a little kick in the backend. When dull equipment is rolling too soon and polished equipment is moving too hard on the backend this is the ball I go to.
--------------------
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Advisory Staff

Carl Hurd

Austintown Ohio (Wedgewood Lanes)

900 Global, AMF Staff Bowler

Tag Team Member #1

<b><i>TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!</i></b>/

O-Zone

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2004, 10:21:25 PM »
EXCALIBER-

I've looked over the posts you've made on the Xception, along with your reply on this topic...I'm assuming this is Ball #2 that you're referring to in your reply?  If so, does this have a weight hole, or was the CG kicked left of the Pin-MB line on your ball?  We have one in our pro shop with the CG kicked right between 1.5 and 2", so if it was drilled for a left-hander, you could put the pin alongside your ring finger with the MB out towards your VAL and probably not need an extra hole.

By the way...I don't drill my own equipment and I'm not totally sure of all of the "technical terms" associated with drilling, so if I've said something that doesn't make any sense, don't be afraid to correct me!

--------------------
Jeff Voght
PBA Eastern Region Member

clintdaley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4246
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2004, 06:43:28 AM »
Would have to agree the X-Ception is probably what you are looking for. It has a cover that fits what you are trying to accomplish and it fits into a category you like (reactive pearl). I did not dull either of my current X-Ceptions, but I plan in getting another one to dull it down and see the difference between an out of box Rule and a dulled down X-Ception.

Clint
--------------------
Clint Daley-Owner
Lets Go Bowling Daley
Salem, Ohio 44460
TRACK ADVISORY PRO SHOP STAFF










Mitch Beasley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2004, 12:01:36 PM »
O-Zone, I would recommend the FAZ for the longer patterns. I like the exception but I have more success with the FAZ on B and D patterns. I have two, one drilled 5 1/4" by 2 1/2 pin above bridge with hole at 4 1/2 inches and one drilled 5 1/2 by 3 1/2 with small hole at 4" pin below middle finger.

The one below middle finger is very smooth and works early with a light scuff. I used this a lot in the early games last week at the RPI in Reno and on the A pattern on the weekend. The one above the bridge is stronger and works exceptionally well when you have to get inside of 20. It still reads the midlane well but has more hit and carries extremely well. I used this the last 5 games every day and led the tournament. The first time I used it on B I shot 300 my third game and I have been VERY impressed with it.

My rev rate it around 470 so if yours is less you may want to move the pin a little right to under you ring finger and above your ring finger with the CG to the right an inch and a half on under and 2 1/2 for the one over to make sure they read the middles real well.

I hope this helps.


--------------------
Beasley pro shop

Track Pro Staff

tenpinspro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4161
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2004, 05:19:13 AM »
Hey Jeff,

Sorry for the delay but this is the first time I've been able to get back on BR.  Based on your info, I'd personally choose the Xception with a layout of 5x4.5-4.75 mb with the pin about 3.5 above mid line.  Based on your pap, you're not showing a lot of tilt so your stuff should get into a roll pretty quick and if you try to open up a shot, it becomes a little hard to hook sharply on the back.

This should still help give you pretty decent length with the ability to turn the corner some since you say the DZ (drilled basically label lev) can get there but sounds like it lacks the finish.  The Xception is a stronger ball by nature and should offer you more than the balls you've mentioned.  

I'd even consider a Rule to help open up the backends more if necessary on the heavier shots.  Mitch's 470 rev rate is pretty high, the rest of us mere mortals need to buy surface to hook.  Hope this helps some and feel free to bounce around some thoughts or ideas if you like, the Crew is here to help.
--------------------
Rick Leong
Ten Pins Pro Shop
Track Intl. - Amateur/Pro Shop Staff  
Vise Inserts Staff
Rick Leong - Ten Pins Pro Shop
Co-Founder - Tag Team Coaching
"El" Presidente of the Legion

Lane Bed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2004, 11:48:57 PM »
Hi Jeff
I really don't agree with the choices here. I ran a PBA league last season and we did the strip /oil to PBA specs. We bowled in 3 different houses. One with brand new AMF synthetics, one on Guardian (Sunset in Albany) you have probably been there, and older wood (Bowlers Club)(Empire State Open). I do not have a lot of rev's either and my choice of ball for Pattern "B" was a 600 sanded Freak Out. Worked very well. Good length and read. The ball has to get back hard and you can't hit the OOB. The Phenom Unleashed, I believe, would be an even better choice. We can't just look to new equipment every time as an answer. The Unleashed is probably the best choice because of its great length and great recovery. B is for boomers and I do not believe that an X-ception would be a good ball of choice for 'B' or 'C' especially here in the Northeast with so many older wooden lanes. Lots of quick transitions.

Pattern C puts you throwing around 13 or 14 and you still need a controlled recovery and I thing the X-ception would be to weak for this. An Animal Untamed with a little polish drilled with the pin above the fingers or a Sheer Havoc would be much better choices for pattern 'C'. However, for patterns 'A', 'D', and 'E' the X-ception would be a good choice. For pattern 'E' though you would have to drill one to do very long. I have a Mojo that I keep just for pattern 'A'. I hope this helps.

------------------------------

EvEryOne rOlls OvEr thE lane bEd

Edited on 12/21/2004 0:49 AM

O-Zone

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2004, 11:52:03 PM »
First, guys...sorry I didn't get back to you sooner!  This is the first I've been able to get onto the site in the last couple of days, though I saw in my e-mail that I was getting responses.  Thanks to all who offered their help!!

Clint-  I'll be checking your posts to see what you felt the difference was between a dull Xception and a Rule.  

Mitch-  My rev rate is under yours...I'll get back to you guys with a number when I get a good measurement.  I'm pretty average...probably close to Walter Ray's normal rate.  I'm probably going to drill a FAZ in the near future.  I'll keep your suggestions in mind if and when I do...I'll get back to you on that!

Rick-
When I first measured for my PAP, I used a dull Columbia Roll that I had under my bed, tried to trace the first oil ring, and spun it on my kitchen table...I wanted to get the information to you guys ASAP.  When I checked my PAP with my spare ball (and a ball spinner ) this weekend, I found it to be 5.5" by .5", which I believe should be a more accurate representation of my PAP.  Still, that's not a lot of tilt.

I think I'll be going with a drilling very close to what you've suggested.  I'll see how that looks on the Xception we have in the shop...the second one we got in has the pin-CG-MB in more of a line, still about a 3" pin.
I've heard a lot of good things about the Rule; I might give one a try if I like the way the Xception looks.  I'm with you on the "mere mortals" comment...nobody will ever mistake me for Robert Smith!


Thanks for your support guys!
--------------------
Jeff Voght
PBA Eastern Region Member

tenpinspro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4161
Re: Xception Drilling
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2004, 09:08:48 AM »
Hey Jeff,

I'd take a good look at what Lanebed wrote.  I also like his recommendation of the Unleashed for a little more ball strength as my Unleashed has always offered me that as well.  I think the main difference I'd say between the Xception and the Unleashed is your choice of what you want off the dry backs.  If you need a little more finish, the Xception should provide that (being resin) and the Unleashed should read the lane just a little earlier for a smoother backend reaction in comparison but still strong.

I'm suggesting the Xception because I know it's stronger then the balls you currently have and it was a ball of interest to you.  Since Lanebed is there and has seen those shots on those surfaces, his evaluation should be taken to heart.  Feel free to give your thoughts and bounce around more ideas/questions as necessary, this is what we're here for.

Thanks for the great input Chuck.
--------------------
Rick Leong
Ten Pins Pro Shop
Track Intl. - Amateur/Pro Shop Staff  
Vise Inserts Staff
Rick Leong - Ten Pins Pro Shop
Co-Founder - Tag Team Coaching
"El" Presidente of the Legion