win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Ever start laying out a ball . .  (Read 10620 times)

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Ever start laying out a ball . .
« on: December 10, 2013, 01:31:34 PM »
 . . and don't like where the layout puts the fingers, so you keep adjusting the numbers a bit at a time until it looks right, which completely negates picking out a layout in the first place?  Laying out a Primal Rage, started at 65x4x35, but I really like where 60x4.5x40 puts the fingers a lot better, but lol that's not the reaction I want . .  what a damn princess . . 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

 

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #31 on: December 11, 2013, 02:48:17 PM »
Think about the things mentioned and how much focus some put on them and how little they truly matter with bowling balls and THS conditions.

People refer to the dual angle method like it does something different then just eyeballing a drilling. The D.A.M. and 4x4x4 and anything else are all different ways of saying the same thing. The D.A.M. method is a precise way that says the these drill angles give you this kind of reaction, this pin to pap difference effect it this way, then the VAL angle gives you these characteristics. You can do the same thing by eyeballing it, the ball doesn't know the difference. Duplicating it, the DAM would be the exact way, where as the eyeball method gets you in the ball park.

Now I have played with the BP software and tried using different pin to pap distances on the same layout, different MB positions, different side weights ect and it shows on a THS that the differences are minimal. Surface was always the bigger factor.



…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #32 on: December 11, 2013, 02:51:42 PM »
 Pic #1

Here is a Taboo with two different layouts (pin up vs pin down)

 75x5x30 vs 75x5x70 chart

pic #2

Same  Taboo with two different layouts (mb by val vs mb by thumb)

40x5x30 vs 80x5x30
« Last Edit: December 11, 2013, 04:17:59 PM by kidlost2000 »
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #33 on: December 11, 2013, 02:55:40 PM »
First pic is a ball with 1oz positive side weight, no side weight, then 1oz negative side weight graphed in that order.



Second pic is a outburst drilled 30 X  3" 4" 5" 6" X 75 in that order
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #34 on: December 11, 2013, 02:56:55 PM »
The biggest difference in reaction always came with surface adjustments.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #35 on: December 11, 2013, 03:03:20 PM »
Yeap, that's pretty much what the ball motion study said.  And one of my points about the dual angle (as said in one of my articles) was the same as what you said, it's not some radical wild way to lay stuff out, it's just adding a bit of precision or maybe more accurate repeatability . .
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #36 on: December 11, 2013, 03:04:47 PM »
And I might have to spring for that Blueprint software, that's really cool.  Good teaching tool too. 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2002
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #37 on: December 11, 2013, 03:12:22 PM »
Or to sell Pro Sects


dR3w

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #38 on: December 11, 2013, 03:44:02 PM »
Thanks for posting that.  Two question:

1. For pic #1 you have pin up vs pin down.  Why keep the angles the same and move the pin to pap distance?  When I think pin up vs pin down, I think the same pin to pap distance, but changing the drill and val angles.

2.  What shot did you use .. if it is a house shot, is that what is reducing some of the effects of the drilling changes, or will you sill these small differences on any shot?


Pic #1

Here is a Taboo with two different layouts (pin up vs pin down)

30x3x50 vs 30x6x50 chart

pic #2

Same  Taboo with two different layouts (mb by val vs mb by thumb)

30x5x40 vs 30x5x80

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #39 on: December 11, 2013, 04:20:47 PM »
Thanks for posting that.  Two question:

1. For pic #1 you have pin up vs pin down.  Why keep the angles the same and move the pin to pap distance?  When I think pin up vs pin down, I think the same pin to pap distance, but changing the drill and val angles.

2.  What shot did you use .. if it is a house shot, is that what is reducing some of the effects of the drilling changes, or will you sill these small differences on any shot?


Pic #1

Here is a Taboo with two different layouts (pin up vs pin down)

30x3x50 vs 30x6x50 chart

pic #2

Same  Taboo with two different layouts (mb by val vs mb by thumb)

30x5x40 vs 30x5x80



Used the wrong pic. That was a 3" pin vs a 6" pin on the same layout. They get to be very similar if you don't pay attention lol.

Made the correct update to the pictures and the angles.

The shot used was a house shot pattern. Didn't really try many of the others during the free trial like I had wished. THS blend the looks of a lot of different layouts and bowling balls.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #40 on: December 11, 2013, 04:40:17 PM »
Everything I thought was a lie. A LIE!

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #41 on: December 14, 2013, 12:05:22 PM »
 For those who were curious about a video, I remembered this from a while back.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipSCwh-E8Fw
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Ever start laying out a ball . .
« Reply #42 on: December 14, 2013, 05:40:46 PM »
It is a great video. Too many want to argue it, and the Brunswick video with the throwbots actual results.

It is a shame but too many people want to believe that a little weight here or there will make all of the difference.

If it is within USBC guidelines of 1 oz it will not matter. If you get in the 2.5 ozs or greater of side weight, top weight ect then it does have an affect on ball reaction. Since that is illegal for obvious reason I would guess then it still shows that "CG NO MATTA".
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.